Re: [PATCH 3/5] net: dsa: ksz: Factor out common tag code

2018-12-12 Thread Marek Vasut
On 12/08/2018 12:34 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 07:18:43PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> From: Tristram Ha 
>>
>> Factor out common code from the tag_ksz , so that the code can be used
>> with other KSZ family switches which use differenly sized tags.
> 
> I prefer this implementation over what Tristram recently submitted. It
> is also what we suggested a while back. However, since then we have
> had Spectra/meltdown, and we now know a function call through a
> pointer is expensive. This is the hot path, every frame comes through
> here, so it is worth taking the time to optimize this. Could you try
> to remove the ksz_tag_ops structure. xmit looks simple, since it is a
> tail call, so you can do that in ksz9477_xmit. Receive looks a bit
> more complex.

They're both simple in the end, I'll send V2 once I test it a bit.

> I also think for the moment we need it ignore PTP until we have the
> big picture sorted out. If need be, the code can be refactored yet
> again. But i don't want PTP holding up getting more switches
> supported.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Tristram Ha 
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut 
>> Cc: Vivien Didelot 
>> Cc: Woojung Huh 
>> Cc: David S. Miller 
>> ---
>>  net/dsa/tag_ksz.c | 125 +-
>>  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_ksz.c b/net/dsa/tag_ksz.c
>> index 036bc62198f28..d94bad1ab7e53 100644
>> --- a/net/dsa/tag_ksz.c
>> +++ b/net/dsa/tag_ksz.c
>> @@ -14,34 +14,30 @@
>>  #include 
>>  #include "dsa_priv.h"
>>  
>> -/* For Ingress (Host -> KSZ), 2 bytes are added before FCS.
>> - * 
>> ---
>> - * 
>> DA(6bytes)|SA(6bytes)||Data(nbytes)|tag0(1byte)|tag1(1byte)|FCS(4bytes)
>> - * 
>> ---
>> - * tag0 : Prioritization (not used now)
>> - * tag1 : each bit represents port (eg, 0x01=port1, 0x02=port2, 0x10=port5)
>> - *
>> - * For Egress (KSZ -> Host), 1 byte is added before FCS.
>> - * 
>> ---
>> - * DA(6bytes)|SA(6bytes)||Data(nbytes)|tag0(1byte)|FCS(4bytes)
>> - * 
>> ---
>> - * tag0 : zero-based value represents port
>> - *(eg, 0x00=port1, 0x02=port3, 0x06=port7)
>> - */
>> +struct ksz_tag_ops {
>> +void(*get_tag)(u8 *tag, unsigned int *port, unsigned int *len);
>> +void(*set_tag)(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev);
>> +};
>>  
>> -#define KSZ_INGRESS_TAG_LEN 2
>> -#define KSZ_EGRESS_TAG_LEN  1
>> +/* Typically only one byte is used for tail tag. */
>> +#define KSZ_EGRESS_TAG_LEN  1
>>  
>> -static struct sk_buff *ksz_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>> +/* Frames with following addresse may need to be sent even when the port is
>> + * closed.
>> + */
>> +static const u8 special_mult_addr[] = {
>> +0x01, 0x80, 0xC2, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
>> +};
>> +
> 
> This is new functionality, not part of the refactoring the
> code. Please add that as a new patch. Also, you can probably make use
> of is_link_local_ether_addr().

Sounds good, will do in V2.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut


Re: [PATCH 3/5] net: dsa: ksz: Factor out common tag code

2018-12-10 Thread Andrew Lunn
> So this ksz_tag_ops is still not acceptable?  As I understand the kernel is
> using this mechanism all over the places.

Hi Tristram

It is used all other the place, but generally, not in the hot path,
just the control plain.

> What is left is a direct copying of the transmit and receive functions for 
> each
> new switch tail tag format.

As i said, one of these looks easy to achieve, the other i did not
look at too closely, but needs more work.

 Andrew


Re: [PATCH 3/5] net: dsa: ksz: Factor out common tag code

2018-12-10 Thread Marek Vasut
On 12/10/2018 09:32 PM, tristram...@microchip.com wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 07:18:43PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> From: Tristram Ha 
>>>
>>> Factor out common code from the tag_ksz , so that the code can be used
>>> with other KSZ family switches which use differenly sized tags.
>>
>> I prefer this implementation over what Tristram recently submitted. It
>> is also what we suggested a while back. However, since then we have
>> had Spectra/meltdown, and we now know a function call through a
>> pointer is expensive. This is the hot path, every frame comes through
>> here, so it is worth taking the time to optimize this. Could you try
>> to remove the ksz_tag_ops structure. xmit looks simple, since it is a
>> tail call, so you can do that in ksz9477_xmit. Receive looks a bit
>> more complex.
>>
>> I also think for the moment we need it ignore PTP until we have the
>> big picture sorted out. If need be, the code can be refactored yet
>> again. But i don't want PTP holding up getting more switches
>> supported.
> 
> Yes, as you may already know, what Marek submitted was my previous
> attempt to support different switches in tag_ksz.c.

I adjusted the code quite a bit, please look again.

> So this ksz_tag_ops is still not acceptable?  As I understand the kernel is
> using this mechanism all over the places.
> 
> What is left is a direct copying of the transmit and receive functions for 
> each
> new switch tail tag format.

Maybe a macro would work ? Or some code runtime-patching ?

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut


RE: [PATCH 3/5] net: dsa: ksz: Factor out common tag code

2018-12-10 Thread Tristram.Ha
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 07:18:43PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > From: Tristram Ha 
> >
> > Factor out common code from the tag_ksz , so that the code can be used
> > with other KSZ family switches which use differenly sized tags.
> 
> I prefer this implementation over what Tristram recently submitted. It
> is also what we suggested a while back. However, since then we have
> had Spectra/meltdown, and we now know a function call through a
> pointer is expensive. This is the hot path, every frame comes through
> here, so it is worth taking the time to optimize this. Could you try
> to remove the ksz_tag_ops structure. xmit looks simple, since it is a
> tail call, so you can do that in ksz9477_xmit. Receive looks a bit
> more complex.
> 
> I also think for the moment we need it ignore PTP until we have the
> big picture sorted out. If need be, the code can be refactored yet
> again. But i don't want PTP holding up getting more switches
> supported.

Yes, as you may already know, what Marek submitted was my previous
attempt to support different switches in tag_ksz.c.

So this ksz_tag_ops is still not acceptable?  As I understand the kernel is
using this mechanism all over the places.

What is left is a direct copying of the transmit and receive functions for each
new switch tail tag format.



Re: [PATCH 3/5] net: dsa: ksz: Factor out common tag code

2018-12-08 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 07:18:43PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> From: Tristram Ha 
> 
> Factor out common code from the tag_ksz , so that the code can be used
> with other KSZ family switches which use differenly sized tags.

I prefer this implementation over what Tristram recently submitted. It
is also what we suggested a while back. However, since then we have
had Spectra/meltdown, and we now know a function call through a
pointer is expensive. This is the hot path, every frame comes through
here, so it is worth taking the time to optimize this. Could you try
to remove the ksz_tag_ops structure. xmit looks simple, since it is a
tail call, so you can do that in ksz9477_xmit. Receive looks a bit
more complex.

I also think for the moment we need it ignore PTP until we have the
big picture sorted out. If need be, the code can be refactored yet
again. But i don't want PTP holding up getting more switches
supported.

> Signed-off-by: Tristram Ha 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut 
> Cc: Vivien Didelot 
> Cc: Woojung Huh 
> Cc: David S. Miller 
> ---
>  net/dsa/tag_ksz.c | 125 +-
>  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_ksz.c b/net/dsa/tag_ksz.c
> index 036bc62198f28..d94bad1ab7e53 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/tag_ksz.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/tag_ksz.c
> @@ -14,34 +14,30 @@
>  #include 
>  #include "dsa_priv.h"
>  
> -/* For Ingress (Host -> KSZ), 2 bytes are added before FCS.
> - * 
> ---
> - * 
> DA(6bytes)|SA(6bytes)||Data(nbytes)|tag0(1byte)|tag1(1byte)|FCS(4bytes)
> - * 
> ---
> - * tag0 : Prioritization (not used now)
> - * tag1 : each bit represents port (eg, 0x01=port1, 0x02=port2, 0x10=port5)
> - *
> - * For Egress (KSZ -> Host), 1 byte is added before FCS.
> - * 
> ---
> - * DA(6bytes)|SA(6bytes)||Data(nbytes)|tag0(1byte)|FCS(4bytes)
> - * 
> ---
> - * tag0 : zero-based value represents port
> - * (eg, 0x00=port1, 0x02=port3, 0x06=port7)
> - */
> +struct ksz_tag_ops {
> + void(*get_tag)(u8 *tag, unsigned int *port, unsigned int *len);
> + void(*set_tag)(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev);
> +};
>  
> -#define  KSZ_INGRESS_TAG_LEN 2
> -#define  KSZ_EGRESS_TAG_LEN  1
> +/* Typically only one byte is used for tail tag. */
> +#define KSZ_EGRESS_TAG_LEN   1
>  
> -static struct sk_buff *ksz_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> +/* Frames with following addresse may need to be sent even when the port is
> + * closed.
> + */
> +static const u8 special_mult_addr[] = {
> + 0x01, 0x80, 0xC2, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
> +};
> +

This is new functionality, not part of the refactoring the
code. Please add that as a new patch. Also, you can probably make use
of is_link_local_ether_addr().

   Andrew


[PATCH 3/5] net: dsa: ksz: Factor out common tag code

2018-12-07 Thread Marek Vasut
From: Tristram Ha 

Factor out common code from the tag_ksz , so that the code can be used
with other KSZ family switches which use differenly sized tags.

Signed-off-by: Tristram Ha 
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut 
Cc: Vivien Didelot 
Cc: Woojung Huh 
Cc: David S. Miller 
---
 net/dsa/tag_ksz.c | 125 +-
 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_ksz.c b/net/dsa/tag_ksz.c
index 036bc62198f28..d94bad1ab7e53 100644
--- a/net/dsa/tag_ksz.c
+++ b/net/dsa/tag_ksz.c
@@ -14,34 +14,30 @@
 #include 
 #include "dsa_priv.h"
 
-/* For Ingress (Host -> KSZ), 2 bytes are added before FCS.
- * ---
- * DA(6bytes)|SA(6bytes)||Data(nbytes)|tag0(1byte)|tag1(1byte)|FCS(4bytes)
- * ---
- * tag0 : Prioritization (not used now)
- * tag1 : each bit represents port (eg, 0x01=port1, 0x02=port2, 0x10=port5)
- *
- * For Egress (KSZ -> Host), 1 byte is added before FCS.
- * ---
- * DA(6bytes)|SA(6bytes)||Data(nbytes)|tag0(1byte)|FCS(4bytes)
- * ---
- * tag0 : zero-based value represents port
- *   (eg, 0x00=port1, 0x02=port3, 0x06=port7)
- */
+struct ksz_tag_ops {
+   void(*get_tag)(u8 *tag, unsigned int *port, unsigned int *len);
+   void(*set_tag)(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev);
+};
 
-#defineKSZ_INGRESS_TAG_LEN 2
-#defineKSZ_EGRESS_TAG_LEN  1
+/* Typically only one byte is used for tail tag. */
+#define KSZ_EGRESS_TAG_LEN 1
 
-static struct sk_buff *ksz_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
+/* Frames with following addresse may need to be sent even when the port is
+ * closed.
+ */
+static const u8 special_mult_addr[] = {
+   0x01, 0x80, 0xC2, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
+};
+
+static struct sk_buff *ksz_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
+   struct ksz_tag_ops *ops, int len)
 {
-   struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev);
struct sk_buff *nskb;
int padlen;
-   u8 *tag;
 
padlen = (skb->len >= VLAN_ETH_ZLEN) ? 0 : VLAN_ETH_ZLEN - skb->len;
 
-   if (skb_tailroom(skb) >= padlen + KSZ_INGRESS_TAG_LEN) {
+   if (skb_tailroom(skb) >= padlen + len) {
/* Let dsa_slave_xmit() free skb */
if (__skb_put_padto(skb, skb->len + padlen, false))
return NULL;
@@ -49,7 +45,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *ksz_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
net_device *dev)
nskb = skb;
} else {
nskb = alloc_skb(NET_IP_ALIGN + skb->len +
-padlen + KSZ_INGRESS_TAG_LEN, GFP_ATOMIC);
+padlen + len, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!nskb)
return NULL;
skb_reserve(nskb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
@@ -70,34 +66,93 @@ static struct sk_buff *ksz_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
net_device *dev)
consume_skb(skb);
}
 
-   tag = skb_put(nskb, KSZ_INGRESS_TAG_LEN);
-   tag[0] = 0;
-   tag[1] = 1 << dp->index; /* destination port */
+   ops->set_tag(nskb, dev);
 
return nskb;
 }
 
 static struct sk_buff *ksz_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
-  struct packet_type *pt)
+  struct packet_type *pt, struct ksz_tag_ops *ops)
 {
-   u8 *tag;
-   int source_port;
+   int sp, len;
+   u8 *tag = skb_tail_pointer(skb) - KSZ_EGRESS_TAG_LEN;
 
-   tag = skb_tail_pointer(skb) - KSZ_EGRESS_TAG_LEN;
+   ops->get_tag(tag, &sp, &len);
 
-   source_port = tag[0] & 7;
-
-   skb->dev = dsa_master_find_slave(dev, 0, source_port);
+   skb->dev = dsa_master_find_slave(dev, 0, sp);
if (!skb->dev)
return NULL;
 
-   pskb_trim_rcsum(skb, skb->len - KSZ_EGRESS_TAG_LEN);
+   pskb_trim_rcsum(skb, skb->len - len);
 
return skb;
 }
 
+/*
+ * For Ingress (Host -> KSZ9477), 2 bytes are added before FCS.
+ * ---
+ * DA(6bytes)|SA(6bytes)||Data(nbytes)|tag0(1byte)|tag1(1byte)|FCS(4bytes)
+ * ---
+ * tag0 : Prioritization (not used now)
+ * tag1 : each bit represents port (eg, 0x01=port1, 0x02=port2, 0x10=port5)
+ *
+ * For Egress (KSZ9477 -> Host), 1 byte is added before FCS.
+ * ---
+ * DA(6bytes)|SA(6bytes)||Data(nbytes)|tag0(1byte)|FCS(4bytes)
+ * ---
+ * tag0 : zero-based value represents port
+ *   (eg, 0x00=port1, 0x