Re: [PATCH net] sctp: fix pr_warn max_data argument type mismatch
On 2018-12-06 09:03, David Miller wrote: > From: Jakub Audykowicz > Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 08:58:37 +0100 > >> My previous patch introduced a compilation warning regarding a type >> mismatch (int vs size_t). This is a one-letter fix for good housekeeping. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jakub Audykowicz > Still wrong and I fixed it when I applied your patch. > > You need to use the 'Z' prefix for size_t, so %Zu in this case. Right, I just realized that as well, thanks!
Re: [PATCH net] sctp: fix pr_warn max_data argument type mismatch
From: Jakub Audykowicz Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 08:58:37 +0100 > My previous patch introduced a compilation warning regarding a type > mismatch (int vs size_t). This is a one-letter fix for good housekeeping. > > Signed-off-by: Jakub Audykowicz Still wrong and I fixed it when I applied your patch. You need to use the 'Z' prefix for size_t, so %Zu in this case.
[PATCH net] sctp: fix pr_warn max_data argument type mismatch
My previous patch introduced a compilation warning regarding a type mismatch (int vs size_t). This is a one-letter fix for good housekeeping. Signed-off-by: Jakub Audykowicz --- net/sctp/chunk.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/sctp/chunk.c b/net/sctp/chunk.c index d5b91bc8a377..ee5638358ad5 100644 --- a/net/sctp/chunk.c +++ b/net/sctp/chunk.c @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ struct sctp_datamsg *sctp_datamsg_from_user(struct sctp_association *asoc, if (unlikely(!max_data)) { max_data = sctp_min_frag_point(sctp_sk(asoc->base.sk), sctp_datachk_len(&asoc->stream)); - pr_warn_ratelimited("%s: asoc:%p frag_point is zero, forcing max_data to default minimum (%d)", + pr_warn_ratelimited("%s: asoc:%p frag_point is zero, forcing max_data to default minimum (%ld)", __func__, asoc, max_data); } -- 2.17.1