Re: [PATCH net-next] dsa: mv88e6xxx: Timeout based on iterations

[Andrew Lunn]

> >  static int mv88e6xxx_wait(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int addr, int reg,
> >   u16 mask)
> >  {
> > -   unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ / 10;
> > +   int i;
> >  
> > -   while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> > +   for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> > u16 val;
> > int err;
> >  
> 
> Since we remove the elapsed time here, can we use mv88e6xxx_wait in
> mv88e6xxx_update? It'd be good to have a consistent wait routine
> everywhere.

Hi Vivien

Yes, it looks like that should work. I will add a second patch to do
this.

Andrew

Re: [PATCH net-next] dsa: mv88e6xxx: Timeout based on iterations

[Vivien Didelot]

Hi Andrew,

Andrew Lunn  writes:

> The mv88e6xxx driver times out operations on the switch based on
> looping until an elapsed wall clock time is reached. However, if
> usleep_range() sleeps much longer than expected, it could timeout with
> an error without actually checking to see if the devices has completed
> the operation. So replace the elapsed time with a fixed upper bound on
> the number of loops.
>
> Testing on various switches has shown that switches takes either 0 or
> 1 iteration, so a maximum of 16 iterations is a safe limit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn 
> ---
>  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 15 ++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c 
> b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> index a230fcba5b64..ac8e9af4879f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> @@ -309,9 +309,9 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_serdes_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip 
> *chip, int reg, u16 val)
>  static int mv88e6xxx_wait(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int addr, int reg,
> u16 mask)
>  {
> - unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ / 10;
> + int i;
>  
> - while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> + for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
>   u16 val;
>   int err;
>  

Since we remove the elapsed time here, can we use mv88e6xxx_wait in
mv88e6xxx_update? It'd be good to have a consistent wait routine
everywhere.

Thanks,

Vivien

[PATCH net-next] dsa: mv88e6xxx: Timeout based on iterations

[Andrew Lunn]

The mv88e6xxx driver times out operations on the switch based on
looping until an elapsed wall clock time is reached. However, if
usleep_range() sleeps much longer than expected, it could timeout with
an error without actually checking to see if the devices has completed
the operation. So replace the elapsed time with a fixed upper bound on
the number of loops.

Testing on various switches has shown that switches takes either 0 or
1 iteration, so a maximum of 16 iterations is a safe limit.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn 
---
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 15 ++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index a230fcba5b64..ac8e9af4879f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
@@ -309,9 +309,9 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_serdes_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip 
*chip, int reg, u16 val)
 static int mv88e6xxx_wait(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int addr, int reg,
  u16 mask)
 {
-   unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ / 10;
+   int i;
 
-   while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
+   for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
u16 val;
int err;
 
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static int _mv88e6xxx_reg_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip 
*chip, int addr,
 static int mv88e6xxx_ppu_disable(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
 {
int ret;
-   unsigned long timeout;
+   int i;
 
ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(chip, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_CONTROL);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -386,8 +386,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_ppu_disable(struct mv88e6xxx_chip 
*chip)
if (ret)
return ret;
 
-   timeout = jiffies + 1 * HZ;
-   while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
+   for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(chip, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_STATUS);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
@@ -403,8 +402,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_ppu_disable(struct mv88e6xxx_chip 
*chip)
 
 static int mv88e6xxx_ppu_enable(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
 {
-   int ret, err;
-   unsigned long timeout;
+   int ret, err, i;
 
ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(chip, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_CONTROL);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -415,8 +413,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_ppu_enable(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
if (err)
return err;
 
-   timeout = jiffies + 1 * HZ;
-   while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
+   for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(chip, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_STATUS);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
-- 
2.8.1