Re: [PATCH net-next3/5] ibmvnic: Free and re-allocate scrqs when tx/rx scrqs change
Hi Nathan, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on net-next/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.16-rc2 next-20180216] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nathan-Fontenot/ibmvnic-Free-and-re-allocate-scrqs-when-tx-rx-scrqs-change/20180218-203503 config: powerpc-allmodconfig (attached as .config) compiler: powerpc64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0 reproduce: wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # save the attached .config to linux build tree make.cross ARCH=powerpc All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/net//ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c: In function 'release_sub_crqs': >> drivers/net//ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:2340:28: error: 'struct ibmvnic_adapter' >> has no member named 'num_active_tx_scrqs'; did you mean >> 'num_active_tx_pools'? for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_active_tx_scrqs; i++) { ^~~ num_active_tx_pools >> drivers/net//ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:2362:28: error: 'struct ibmvnic_adapter' >> has no member named 'num_active_rx_scrqs'; did you mean >> 'num_active_rx_pools'? for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_active_rx_scrqs; i++) { ^~~ num_active_rx_pools vim +2340 drivers/net//ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c 2334 2335 static void release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter, int do_h_free) 2336 { 2337 int i; 2338 2339 if (adapter->tx_scrq) { > 2340 for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_active_tx_scrqs; i++) { 2341 if (!adapter->tx_scrq[i]) 2342 continue; 2343 2344 netdev_dbg(adapter->netdev, "Releasing tx_scrq[%d]\n", 2345 i); 2346 if (adapter->tx_scrq[i]->irq) { 2347 free_irq(adapter->tx_scrq[i]->irq, 2348 adapter->tx_scrq[i]); 2349 irq_dispose_mapping(adapter->tx_scrq[i]->irq); 2350 adapter->tx_scrq[i]->irq = 0; 2351 } 2352 2353 release_sub_crq_queue(adapter, adapter->tx_scrq[i], 2354do_h_free); 2355 } 2356 2357 kfree(adapter->tx_scrq); 2358 adapter->tx_scrq = NULL; 2359 } 2360 2361 if (adapter->rx_scrq) { > 2362 for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_active_rx_scrqs; i++) { 2363 if (!adapter->rx_scrq[i]) 2364 continue; 2365 2366 netdev_dbg(adapter->netdev, "Releasing rx_scrq[%d]\n", 2367 i); 2368 if (adapter->rx_scrq[i]->irq) { 2369 free_irq(adapter->rx_scrq[i]->irq, 2370 adapter->rx_scrq[i]); 2371 irq_dispose_mapping(adapter->rx_scrq[i]->irq); 2372 adapter->rx_scrq[i]->irq = 0; 2373 } 2374 2375 release_sub_crq_queue(adapter, adapter->rx_scrq[i], 2376do_h_free); 2377 } 2378 2379 kfree(adapter->rx_scrq); 2380 adapter->rx_scrq = NULL; 2381 } 2382 } 2383 --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructureOpen Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation .config.gz Description: application/gzip
Re: [PATCH net-next3/5] ibmvnic: Free and re-allocate scrqs when tx/rx scrqs change
On 02/17/2018 05:32 PM, Nathan Fontenot wrote: > When the driver resets it is possible that the number of tx/rx > sub-crqs can change. This patch handles this so that the driver does > not try to access non-existent sub-crqs. > > Additionally, a parameter is added to release_sub_crqs() so that > we know if the h_call to free the sub-crq needs to be made. In > the reset path we have to do a reset of the main crq, which is > a free followed by a register of the main crq. The free of main > crq results in all of the sub crq's being free'ed. When updating > sub-crq count in the reset path we do not want to h_free the > sub-crqs, they are already free'ed. This patch has a bug in that it does not use the correct queue count when releasing the sub crqs when the driver is in the probed state. A version 2 of the patch set will be sent. -Nathan > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot> --- > drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 69 > ++-- > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c > b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c > index 9cfbb20b5ac1..a3079d5c072c 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c > @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ MODULE_VERSION(IBMVNIC_DRIVER_VERSION); > > static int ibmvnic_version = IBMVNIC_INITIAL_VERSION; > static int ibmvnic_remove(struct vio_dev *); > -static void release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvnic_adapter *); > +static void release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvnic_adapter *, int); > static int ibmvnic_reset_crq(struct ibmvnic_adapter *); > static int ibmvnic_send_crq_init(struct ibmvnic_adapter *); > static int ibmvnic_reenable_crq_queue(struct ibmvnic_adapter *); > @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ static int ibmvnic_login(struct net_device *netdev) > do { > if (adapter->renegotiate) { > adapter->renegotiate = false; > - release_sub_crqs(adapter); > + release_sub_crqs(adapter, 1); > > reinit_completion(>init_done); > send_cap_queries(adapter); > @@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@ static int do_reset(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter, > if (adapter->reset_reason == VNIC_RESET_CHANGE_PARAM || > adapter->wait_for_reset) { > release_resources(adapter); > - release_sub_crqs(adapter); > + release_sub_crqs(adapter, 1); > release_crq_queue(adapter); > } > > @@ -2241,24 +2241,27 @@ static int reset_sub_crq_queues(struct > ibmvnic_adapter *adapter) > } > > static void release_sub_crq_queue(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter, > - struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue *scrq) > + struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue *scrq, > + int do_h_free) > { > struct device *dev = >vdev->dev; > long rc; > > netdev_dbg(adapter->netdev, "Releasing sub-CRQ\n"); > > - /* Close the sub-crqs */ > - do { > - rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, > - adapter->vdev->unit_address, > - scrq->crq_num); > - } while (rc == H_BUSY || H_IS_LONG_BUSY(rc)); > + if (do_h_free) { > + /* Close the sub-crqs */ > + do { > + rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, > + adapter->vdev->unit_address, > + scrq->crq_num); > + } while (rc == H_BUSY || H_IS_LONG_BUSY(rc)); > > - if (rc) { > - netdev_err(adapter->netdev, > -"Failed to release sub-CRQ %16lx, rc = %ld\n", > -scrq->crq_num, rc); > + if (rc) { > + netdev_err(adapter->netdev, > +"Failed to release sub-CRQ %16lx, rc = > %ld\n", > +scrq->crq_num, rc); > + } > } > > dma_unmap_single(dev, scrq->msg_token, 4 * PAGE_SIZE, > @@ -2326,12 +2329,12 @@ static struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue > *init_sub_crq_queue(struct ibmvnic_adapter > return NULL; > } > > -static void release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter) > +static void release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter, int do_h_free) > { > int i; > > if (adapter->tx_scrq) { > - for (i = 0; i < adapter->req_tx_queues; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_active_tx_scrqs; i++) { > if (!adapter->tx_scrq[i]) > continue; > > @@ -2344,7 +2347,8 @@ static void release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvnic_adapter > *adapter) > adapter->tx_scrq[i]->irq = 0; > } > > - release_sub_crq_queue(adapter, adapter->tx_scrq[i]); > +
[PATCH net-next3/5] ibmvnic: Free and re-allocate scrqs when tx/rx scrqs change
When the driver resets it is possible that the number of tx/rx sub-crqs can change. This patch handles this so that the driver does not try to access non-existent sub-crqs. Additionally, a parameter is added to release_sub_crqs() so that we know if the h_call to free the sub-crq needs to be made. In the reset path we have to do a reset of the main crq, which is a free followed by a register of the main crq. The free of main crq results in all of the sub crq's being free'ed. When updating sub-crq count in the reset path we do not want to h_free the sub-crqs, they are already free'ed. Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot--- drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 69 ++-- 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c index 9cfbb20b5ac1..a3079d5c072c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ MODULE_VERSION(IBMVNIC_DRIVER_VERSION); static int ibmvnic_version = IBMVNIC_INITIAL_VERSION; static int ibmvnic_remove(struct vio_dev *); -static void release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvnic_adapter *); +static void release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvnic_adapter *, int); static int ibmvnic_reset_crq(struct ibmvnic_adapter *); static int ibmvnic_send_crq_init(struct ibmvnic_adapter *); static int ibmvnic_reenable_crq_queue(struct ibmvnic_adapter *); @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ static int ibmvnic_login(struct net_device *netdev) do { if (adapter->renegotiate) { adapter->renegotiate = false; - release_sub_crqs(adapter); + release_sub_crqs(adapter, 1); reinit_completion(>init_done); send_cap_queries(adapter); @@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@ static int do_reset(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter, if (adapter->reset_reason == VNIC_RESET_CHANGE_PARAM || adapter->wait_for_reset) { release_resources(adapter); - release_sub_crqs(adapter); + release_sub_crqs(adapter, 1); release_crq_queue(adapter); } @@ -2241,24 +2241,27 @@ static int reset_sub_crq_queues(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter) } static void release_sub_crq_queue(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter, - struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue *scrq) + struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue *scrq, + int do_h_free) { struct device *dev = >vdev->dev; long rc; netdev_dbg(adapter->netdev, "Releasing sub-CRQ\n"); - /* Close the sub-crqs */ - do { - rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, - adapter->vdev->unit_address, - scrq->crq_num); - } while (rc == H_BUSY || H_IS_LONG_BUSY(rc)); + if (do_h_free) { + /* Close the sub-crqs */ + do { + rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, + adapter->vdev->unit_address, + scrq->crq_num); + } while (rc == H_BUSY || H_IS_LONG_BUSY(rc)); - if (rc) { - netdev_err(adapter->netdev, - "Failed to release sub-CRQ %16lx, rc = %ld\n", - scrq->crq_num, rc); + if (rc) { + netdev_err(adapter->netdev, + "Failed to release sub-CRQ %16lx, rc = %ld\n", + scrq->crq_num, rc); + } } dma_unmap_single(dev, scrq->msg_token, 4 * PAGE_SIZE, @@ -2326,12 +2329,12 @@ static struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue *init_sub_crq_queue(struct ibmvnic_adapter return NULL; } -static void release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter) +static void release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter, int do_h_free) { int i; if (adapter->tx_scrq) { - for (i = 0; i < adapter->req_tx_queues; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_active_tx_scrqs; i++) { if (!adapter->tx_scrq[i]) continue; @@ -2344,7 +2347,8 @@ static void release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter) adapter->tx_scrq[i]->irq = 0; } - release_sub_crq_queue(adapter, adapter->tx_scrq[i]); + release_sub_crq_queue(adapter, adapter->tx_scrq[i], + do_h_free); } kfree(adapter->tx_scrq); @@ -2352,7 +2356,7 @@ static void release_sub_crqs(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter) } if (adapter->rx_scrq) { - for (i = 0; i <