After the commit 802bfb19152c ("net/sched: user-space can't set
unknown tcfa_action values"), unknown tcfa_action values are
converted to TC_ACT_UNSPEC, but the common agreement is instead
rejecting such configurations.
This change also introduces a helper to simplify the destruction
of a single action, avoiding code duplication.
v1 -> v2:
- helper is now static and renamed according to act_* convention
- updated extack message, according to the new behavior
Fixes: 802bfb19152c ("net/sched: user-space can't set unknown tcfa_action
values")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni
---
net/sched/act_api.c | 16 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
index db83dac1e7f4..316c98bb87e4 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
@@ -662,6 +662,13 @@ int tcf_action_destroy(struct tc_action *actions[], int
bind)
return ret;
}
+static int tcf_action_destroy_1(struct tc_action *a, int bind)
+{
+ struct tc_action *actions[] = { a, NULL };
+
+ return tcf_action_destroy(actions, bind);
+}
+
static int tcf_action_put(struct tc_action *p)
{
return __tcf_action_put(p, false);
@@ -881,17 +888,16 @@ struct tc_action *tcf_action_init_1(struct net *net,
struct tcf_proto *tp,
if (TC_ACT_EXT_CMP(a->tcfa_action, TC_ACT_GOTO_CHAIN)) {
err = tcf_action_goto_chain_init(a, tp);
if (err) {
- struct tc_action *actions[] = { a, NULL };
-
- tcf_action_destroy(actions, bind);
+ tcf_action_destroy_1(a, bind);
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Failed to init TC action
chain");
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
}
if (!tcf_action_valid(a->tcfa_action)) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "invalid action value, using
TC_ACT_UNSPEC instead");
- a->tcfa_action = TC_ACT_UNSPEC;
+ tcf_action_destroy_1(a, bind);
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid control action value");
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
return a;
--
2.17.1
