Re: [PATCH nf-next v4 1/2] netfilter: Fix potential null pointer dereference

2016-09-30 Thread Pablo Neira Ayuso
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:35:14AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> It's possible for nf_hook_entry_head to return NULL.  If two
> nf_unregister_net_hook calls happen simultaneously with a single hook
> entry in the list, both will enter the nf_hook_mutex critical section.
> The first will successfully delete the head, but the second will see
> this NULL pointer and attempt to dereference.
> 
> This fix ensures that no null pointer dereference could occur when such
> a condition happens.

Applied, thanks Aaron.


[PATCH nf-next v4 1/2] netfilter: Fix potential null pointer dereference

2016-09-28 Thread Aaron Conole
It's possible for nf_hook_entry_head to return NULL.  If two
nf_unregister_net_hook calls happen simultaneously with a single hook
entry in the list, both will enter the nf_hook_mutex critical section.
The first will successfully delete the head, but the second will see
this NULL pointer and attempt to dereference.

This fix ensures that no null pointer dereference could occur when such
a condition happens.

Fixes: e3b37f11e6e4 ("netfilter: replace list_head with single linked list")
Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole 
---
 net/netfilter/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c
index 360c63d..e58e420 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/core.c
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ void nf_unregister_net_hook(struct net *net, const struct 
nf_hook_ops *reg)
 
mutex_lock(&nf_hook_mutex);
hooks_entry = nf_hook_entry_head(net, reg);
-   if (hooks_entry->orig_ops == reg) {
+   if (hooks_entry && hooks_entry->orig_ops == reg) {
nf_set_hooks_head(net, reg,
  nf_entry_dereference(hooks_entry->next));
goto unlock;
-- 
2.7.4