RFC: removing the dgrs net driver

2006-12-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
Based on the information in the email forwarded below I'd remove the 
dgrs net driver (this wasn't the first driver shipped with the kernel 
without any hardware ever produced...).

Is this OK or is there any doubt whether this information is true?

cu
Adrian


- Forwarded message from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Date:   Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:00:12 -0400
From: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Please remove useless dgrs driver

An official email from digi.com to Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
explained:

 Dear Andres:

 After further research, we found that this product was killed in place
 and never reached the market.  We would like to request that this not be
 included.

Copy at http://wiki.debian.org/KernelFirmwareLicensing (this was discovered
during research into firmware licensing).

The drgs driver is useless (no hardware to drive) and should be removed.
The files which should be deleted from the tree are:
drivers/net/dgrs.c
drivers/net/dgrs.h
drivers/net/dgrs_es4h.h
drivers/net/dgrs_plx9060.h
drivers/net/dgrs_i82596.h
drivers/net/dgrs_ether.h
drivers/net/dgrs_asstruct.h
drivers/net/dgrs_bcomm.h
drivers/net/dgrs_firmware.c

It will probably also be necessary to delete some stuff from drivers/net/Kconfig
and drivers/net/Makefile, but I assume that this will be trivial for any
net maintainer.

Thanks in advance for doing this.

-- 
Nathanael Nerode  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

(Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in
the interest of efficiency.) --Steve Lanagasek,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01056.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

- End forwarded message -

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: RFC: removing the dgrs net driver

2006-12-02 Thread Alan
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 18:19:32 +0100
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Based on the information in the email forwarded below I'd remove the 
 dgrs net driver (this wasn't the first driver shipped with the kernel 
 without any hardware ever produced...).
 
 Is this OK or is there any doubt whether this information is true?

As I understand it a small number of such devices were produced, but I
have no objection to it going away. Even if someone had such a card it
would not actually be useful any more.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: RFC: removing the dgrs net driver

2006-12-02 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 06:19:32PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 Based on the information in the email forwarded below I'd remove the 
 dgrs net driver (this wasn't the first driver shipped with the kernel 
 without any hardware ever produced...).
 
 Is this OK or is there any doubt whether this information is true?
 
 cu
 Adrian

ok thanks for doing this,
as the reporter was to lazy to cook up a proper patch for that.

there is zero bug report for dgrs on the debian bts nor did i find
one in bugzilla.kernel.org. redhat guys might want to verify on their
side.

 
 - Forwarded message from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
 
 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:00:12 -0400
 From: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
 Subject: Please remove useless dgrs driver
 
 An official email from digi.com to Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 explained:
 
  Dear Andres:
 
  After further research, we found that this product was killed in place
  and never reached the market.  We would like to request that this not be
  included.
 
 Copy at http://wiki.debian.org/KernelFirmwareLicensing (this was discovered
 during research into firmware licensing).
 
 The drgs driver is useless (no hardware to drive) and should be removed.
 The files which should be deleted from the tree are:
 drivers/net/dgrs.c
 drivers/net/dgrs.h
 drivers/net/dgrs_es4h.h
 drivers/net/dgrs_plx9060.h
 drivers/net/dgrs_i82596.h
 drivers/net/dgrs_ether.h
 drivers/net/dgrs_asstruct.h
 drivers/net/dgrs_bcomm.h
 drivers/net/dgrs_firmware.c
 
 It will probably also be necessary to delete some stuff from 
 drivers/net/Kconfig
 and drivers/net/Makefile, but I assume that this will be trivial for any
 net maintainer.
 
 Thanks in advance for doing this.
 
 -- 
 Nathanael Nerode  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 (Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in
 the interest of efficiency.) --Steve Lanagasek,
 http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01056.html
 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 
 - End forwarded message -
--
maks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html