Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 3/3] rdma: Add an option to rename IB device interface

2018-10-29 Thread Leon Romanovsky
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 11:07:06AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 10/29/18 4:30 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for being slow in response, I was on vacation.
> > --
> >
> > This print is intended to warn about missing "new name" and it is not
> > checked by rd_exec_require_dev()
> >
> > To emphasize it:
> >
> > diff --git a/rdma/dev.c b/rdma/dev.c
> > index 760b7fb3..468ae686 100644
> > --- a/rdma/dev.c
> > +++ b/rdma/dev.c
> > @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ static int dev_set_name(struct rd *rd)
> > uint32_t seq;
> >
> > if (rd_no_arg(rd)) {
> > +   pr_err("hello world\n");
> > pr_err("Please provide device new  name.\n");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > Produces the following output:
> > [leonro@server iproute2]$ ./rdma/rdma dev set mlx5_0 name
> > hello world
> > Please provide device new name.
> >
> > So how will we progress from here? Should I respin?
>
> ok, thanks for the explanation.
>
> Steve mentioned an update to the man page is needed as well. Please do
> that in the respin.

No problem, will do, thanks

>
> Thanks,


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 3/3] rdma: Add an option to rename IB device interface

2018-10-29 Thread David Ahern
On 10/29/18 4:30 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> 
> Sorry for being slow in response, I was on vacation.
> --
> 
> This print is intended to warn about missing "new name" and it is not
> checked by rd_exec_require_dev()
> 
> To emphasize it:
> 
> diff --git a/rdma/dev.c b/rdma/dev.c
> index 760b7fb3..468ae686 100644
> --- a/rdma/dev.c
> +++ b/rdma/dev.c
> @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ static int dev_set_name(struct rd *rd)
> uint32_t seq;
> 
>   if (rd_no_arg(rd)) {
> +   pr_err("hello world\n");
> pr_err("Please provide device new  name.\n");
>   return -EINVAL;
>   }
> 
> Produces the following output:
> [leonro@server iproute2]$ ./rdma/rdma dev set mlx5_0 name
> hello world
> Please provide device new name.
> 
> So how will we progress from here? Should I respin?

ok, thanks for the explanation.

Steve mentioned an update to the man page is needed as well. Please do
that in the respin.

Thanks,


Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 3/3] rdma: Add an option to rename IB device interface

2018-10-29 Thread Leon Romanovsky
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 10:02:43AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 10/18/18 5:51 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky 
> >
> > Enrich rdmatool with an option to rename IB devices,
> > the command interface follows Iproute2 convention:
> > "rdma dev set [OLD-DEVNAME] name NEW-DEVNAME"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky 
> > ---
> >  rdma/dev.c | 35 +++
> >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/rdma/dev.c b/rdma/dev.c
> > index e2eafe47..760b7fb3 100644
> > --- a/rdma/dev.c
> > +++ b/rdma/dev.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> >  static int dev_help(struct rd *rd)
> >  {
> > pr_out("Usage: %s dev show [DEV]\n", rd->filename);
> > +   pr_out("   %s dev set [DEV] name DEVNAME\n", rd->filename);
> > return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -240,17 +241,51 @@ static int dev_one_show(struct rd *rd)
> > return rd_exec_cmd(rd, cmds, "parameter");
> >  }
> >
> > +static int dev_set_name(struct rd *rd)
> > +{
> > +   uint32_t seq;
> > +
> > +   if (rd_no_arg(rd)) {
> > +   pr_err("Please provide device new name.\n");
> > +   return -EINVAL;
> > +   }
>
> This is redundant with rd_exec_require_dev which is the required path to
> get to this point.

Sorry for being slow in response, I was on vacation.
--

This print is intended to warn about missing "new name" and it is not
checked by rd_exec_require_dev()

To emphasize it:

diff --git a/rdma/dev.c b/rdma/dev.c
index 760b7fb3..468ae686 100644
--- a/rdma/dev.c
+++ b/rdma/dev.c
@@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ static int dev_set_name(struct rd *rd)
uint32_t seq;

if (rd_no_arg(rd)) {
+   pr_err("hello world\n");
pr_err("Please provide device new  name.\n");
return -EINVAL;
}

Produces the following output:
[leonro@server iproute2]$ ./rdma/rdma dev set mlx5_0 name
hello world
Please provide device new name.

So how will we progress from here? Should I respin?

Thanks


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 3/3] rdma: Add an option to rename IB device interface

2018-10-21 Thread David Ahern
On 10/18/18 5:51 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky 
> 
> Enrich rdmatool with an option to rename IB devices,
> the command interface follows Iproute2 convention:
> "rdma dev set [OLD-DEVNAME] name NEW-DEVNAME"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky 
> ---
>  rdma/dev.c | 35 +++
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/rdma/dev.c b/rdma/dev.c
> index e2eafe47..760b7fb3 100644
> --- a/rdma/dev.c
> +++ b/rdma/dev.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  static int dev_help(struct rd *rd)
>  {
>   pr_out("Usage: %s dev show [DEV]\n", rd->filename);
> + pr_out("   %s dev set [DEV] name DEVNAME\n", rd->filename);
>   return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -240,17 +241,51 @@ static int dev_one_show(struct rd *rd)
>   return rd_exec_cmd(rd, cmds, "parameter");
>  }
>  
> +static int dev_set_name(struct rd *rd)
> +{
> + uint32_t seq;
> +
> + if (rd_no_arg(rd)) {
> + pr_err("Please provide device new name.\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }

This is redundant with rd_exec_require_dev which is the required path to
get to this point.