Hi, Emil
Thanks for your reply.
I made simple tests. And maybe this patch should work. Because you can
reproduce this problem, would you like to make tests with this patch?
If this patch can fix this problem, it can prove that the root cause is
correct.
We can find another solution to fix this problem.
If this patch can not fix this problem, maybe we should make further
investigations
to find the root cause.
Thanks a lot.
Zhu Yanjun
On 02/01/2016 11:53 PM, Tantilov, Emil S wrote:
-Original Message-
From: zyjzyj2...@gmail.com [mailto:zyjzyj2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2016 11:28 PM
To: zyjzyj2...@gmail.com; Tantilov, Emil S; Schmitt, Phillip J; Kirsher,
Jeffrey T; netdev@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net;
Shteinbock, Boris (Wind River)
Subject: ixgbe: get link speed as a slave nic unrelated with link
Hi, Emil
Thanks for your patch.
After I applied your patch, the following are the feedback from my users.
"
Users had tested the latest patch that you provided and it is much improved
now. However it’s still not good enough as the users are planning field
deployment. Here are their findings:
So close, but not quite 100%. I did run over 2500 re-negotiations on one
interface of a bonded pair and got the 0 MBps status total of three times.
The longest run without single error was something like 1800 re-
negotiations or so. So, this version seems to improve the situation
immensely (the unpatched driver fails like 25% of the time), but there
still seems to remain some tiny race somewhere.
Yes at the time of the bonding interface coming up there can be a message about
0 Mbps in dmesg,
however the actual bond once fully up will have the correct speeds as seen by:
#cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
Thanks,
Emil
