Re: af_packet: tone down the Tx-ring unsupported spew.
From: Dave JonesDate: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:11:50 -0400 > Trinity and other fuzzers can hit this WARN on far too easily, > resulting in a tainted kernel that hinders automated fuzzing. > > Replace it with a rate-limited printk. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones Looks good, thanks Dave.
Re: af_packet: tone down the Tx-ring unsupported spew.
On 04/04/2016 09:11 PM, Dave Jones wrote: Trinity and other fuzzers can hit this WARN on far too easily, resulting in a tainted kernel that hinders automated fuzzing. Replace it with a rate-limited printk. Signed-off-by: Dave JonesAcked-by: Daniel Borkmann
af_packet: tone down the Tx-ring unsupported spew.
Trinity and other fuzzers can hit this WARN on far too easily, resulting in a tainted kernel that hinders automated fuzzing. Replace it with a rate-limited printk. Signed-off-by: Dave Jonesdiff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c index 1ecfa710ca98..f12c17f355d9 100644 --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c @@ -4151,7 +4151,7 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk, union tpacket_req_u *req_u, /* Opening a Tx-ring is NOT supported in TPACKET_V3 */ if (!closing && tx_ring && (po->tp_version > TPACKET_V2)) { - WARN(1, "Tx-ring is not supported.\n"); + net_warn_ratelimited("Tx-ring is not supported.\n"); goto out; }