Rendering in 2.0

2009-03-01 Thread Mark Williams
As you can see from this screenshot, 2.0 isn't rendering this site properly 
(though 1.2 does)

http://xs537.xs.to/xs537/09090/2009-03-01-104438_1003x907_scrot239.png

-- 
Mark Williams mark.willi...@ntlworld.com



Re: Rendering in 2.0

2009-03-01 Thread Mark Williams
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 11:26:34 +
Rob Kendrick rjek-dgxf7japlxvbejmqvebnxkb+6bgkl...@public.gmane.org wrote:

 On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:58:52 +
 Mark Williams mark.williams-XZoyATsUNX5Wk0Htik3J/w...@public.gmane.org 
 wrote:
 
  As you can see from this screenshot, 2.0 isn't rendering this site
  properly (though 1.2 does)
  
  http://xs537.xs.to/xs537/09090/2009-03-01-104438_1003x907_scrot239.png
 
 A screen shot of how 1.2 rendered this would be helpful.
 
 B.
 
 


-- 
Mark Williams mark.willi...@ntlworld.com

Okay

http://xs137.xs.to/xs137/09090/2009-03-01-113308_1003x907_scrot587.png



CSS: a:hover and z-index

2009-03-01 Thread Gary Jones
Hi

Does anyone know when/if the CSS pseudo class a:hover  and z-index 
property is planned. I see they're listed as 'not started' at the 
moment.

Thanks

-- 
Gary Jones
Get free cashback for your online purchases
http://www.topcashback.co.uk/percap



Re: Rendering in 2.0

2009-03-01 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:58:52 +
Mark Williams mark.willi...@ntlworld.com wrote:

 As you can see from this screenshot, 2.0 isn't rendering this site
 properly (though 1.2 does)
 
 http://xs537.xs.to/xs537/09090/2009-03-01-104438_1003x907_scrot239.png

A screen shot of how 1.2 rendered this would be helpful.

B.



Re: CSS: a:hover and z-index

2009-03-01 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:35:08 GMT
Gary Jones localn...@ntlworld.com wrote:

 Does anyone know when/if the CSS pseudo class a:hover  and z-index 
 property is planned. I see they're listed as 'not started' at the 
 moment.

There is no plan.  Please note that this does not mean we do not intend
to implement it.  Currently, we are working on other things and our
free time short.

B.



Mysterious hex C2 AD

2009-03-01 Thread Bernard Boase
Just looked at the site www.world-science.net

Netsurf renders much of its text with inter-syllable sequences ­ 
which, in the original HTML, are all hex C2 AD.

Is this legitimate HTML perhaps for automatic hyphenation or 
something? Should Netsurf edit it out? Firefox does.

Whilst HTML entity #xC2AD; seems to be valid,
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/c2ad/index.htm
tell us that U+C2AD is not a valid unicode character.

Any idea what's going on?

-- 
Bernard



Re: Mysterious hex C2 AD

2009-03-01 Thread Keith Hopper
In article bdf1473550.bo...@boase.demon.co.uk,
   Bernard Boase b.bo...@bcs.org wrote:
 Just looked at the site www.world-science.net

 Netsurf renders much of its text with inter-syllable sequences ­
 which, in the original HTML, are all hex C2 AD.

 This is utf-8 for soft hyphen. Netsurf isn't handling this encoding
it seems - which is intended to give a hint to a browser as to how a word
could be split across a line boundary as in printing hyphenation. If there
is no need to break across a line boundary then the hyphen should be
silently ignored - as does Firefox.

 Is this legitimate HTML perhaps for automatic hyphenation or
 something? Should Netsurf edit it out? Firefox does.

 Whilst HTML entity #xC2AD; seems to be valid,
 http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/c2ad/index.htm
 tell us that U+C2AD is not a valid unicode character.

 I'm sorry to say that all of the different 'encodings' on that web
document are generated on the fly as the document is being served -
auto-magically - but blindly. If the code is not valid as a Unicode then
that is it - allbets are off!  The utf-8 is the correct encoding for the
Unicode code point U+00AD - try looking at

http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/00ad/index.htm

 Keith

-- 
Inspired!



Netsurf failing on APOD

2009-03-01 Thread Steve Clark
Can anyone confirm that recent versions of Netsurf are failing to display
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/.

It works on 1.2 but fails with r6586-r6659, but it may have failed earlier
as I don't update that often.

-- 
Steve Clark
   
{sjcl...@ormail.co.uk using a 129Mb SA 6.14 RiscPC}



Re: Netsurf failing on APOD

2009-03-01 Thread Dave Higton
In message 50356818e4sjcl...@ormail.co.uk
  Steve Clark sjcl...@ormail.co.uk wrote:

 Can anyone confirm that recent versions of Netsurf are failing to display
 http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/.

Blank white window here, r6658, Iyonix, RO5.11, 512 MB.

Dave



Re: Netsurf failing on APOD

2009-03-01 Thread Brian Howlett
On 1 Mar, Dave Higton  wrote:

 In message 50356818e4sjcl...@ormail.co.uk
   Steve Clark sjcl...@ormail.co.uk wrote:

 Can anyone confirm that recent versions of Netsurf are failing to display
 http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/.

 Blank white window here, r6658, Iyonix, RO5.11, 512 MB.

Works fine here - r6658 on RO 5.13
-- 
Brian Howlett
--
Last year I went fishing with Salvador Dali. He was using a dotted
line. He caught every other fish.



Re: Mysterious hex C2 AD

2009-03-01 Thread James Bursa
On Sunday 01 March 2009, Bernard Boase wrote:
 Just looked at the site www.world-science.net

 Netsurf renders much of its text with inter-syllable sequences ­
 which, in the original HTML, are all hex C2 AD.

What version of NetSurf? In Page - Info, what does Encoding say?

NetSurf doesn't support soft hyphens but it should be displaying these as 
regular hyphens. What you're seeing seems to show that it isn't interpreting 
that page as UTF-8 correctly.

James

-- 
James Bursa, NetSurf developerhttp://www.netsurf-browser.org/