Re: netsurf-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 6

2012-03-29 Thread Tricia Garner
On 26 Mar, in article
8f18b3c749ca5517d1f25a4db079e5d1-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBeX15ZVF0WXVloCVQ6XFxcQ0IDWFhdQg==-webmailer2@s,
  m0n0 o...@monochrom.net wrote:
  Am Montag, den 26.03.2012, 00:37 +0200 schrieb Tim Hill 
  t...@timil.com:

  Why's it there? Are there still people on dialup who need it?

  Generally this feature is offered by the Mail list managers to
  provide users an option limit the amount of mails they get. This
  has nothing to do with dialup. It's just less annoying to get 1
  mail once a day, instead of getting 40 mails...

  I'm subscribed to several mail lists and I like the digest feature.

  Greets,
  m

How can one lng email with all the replies in all the threads
which people haven't snipped repeated again and again possibly be
less annoying than 40 emails? Just curious. 

I know subscribers on this list are good at trimming quotes, but
there are plenty of others where it just doesn't happen.

-- 

Tricia


These taglines aren't always all that interesting...



Re: netsurf-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 6

2012-03-29 Thread evanallen
In article 5277f53bddtri...@orchid-squad.org.uk,
   Tricia Garner tri...@orchid-squad.org.uk wrote:
 On 26 Mar, in article
 8f18b3c749ca5517d1f25a4db079e5d1-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBeX15ZVF0WXVloCVQ6XFxcQ0IDWFhdQg==-webmailer2@s,
   m0n0 o...@monochrom.net wrote:
   Am Montag, den 26.03.2012, 00:37 +0200 schrieb Tim Hill 
   t...@timil.com:

   Why's it there? Are there still people on dialup who need it?

   Generally this feature is offered by the Mail list managers to
   provide users an option limit the amount of mails they get. This
   has nothing to do with dialup. It's just less annoying to get 1
   mail once a day, instead of getting 40 mails...

   I'm subscribed to several mail lists and I like the digest feature.

   Greets,
   m

 How can one lng email with all the replies in all the threads
 which people haven't snipped repeated again and again possibly be
 less annoying than 40 emails? Just curious. 

It is a matter of personal preference. For me I prefer the one long
digest rather than many emails. Obviously others prefer all the single
emails.




Re: netsurf-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 6

2012-03-29 Thread Richard Porter
On 29 Mar 2012 Tricia Garner  wrote:

 How can one lng email with all the replies in all the threads
 which people haven't snipped repeated again and again possibly be
 less annoying than 40 emails? Just curious.

I quite agree. With 40 messages properly threaded it's easy just to 
ignore topics that you're not interested in. With digests you have to 
plough through everything, and then of course you have the problem of 
how to post a reply.

-- 
Richard Porterhttp://www.minijem.plus.com/
  mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com
I don't want a user experience - I just want stuff that works.



Digest mode

2012-03-29 Thread m0n0
Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2012, 11:21 +0200 schrieb Richard Porter 
r...@minijem.plus.com:



With digests you have to
plough through everything, and then of course you have the problem of
how to post a reply.


You can't talk for everyone. It depends on several things:  for example 
personal taste

and the application that you use.

For me it is more easy to look at the digest summary and see if there 
is something that is interesting.
If there is something interesting, I'm going to take a further look at 
the message.


Greets,
m





Digest mode

2012-03-29 Thread m0n0
Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2012, 11:55 +0200 schrieb george greenfield 
george.greenfi...@tiscali.co.uk:



I too prefer individual messages, for same reasons as Richard states.
I tend to ignore the digest, TBH.



Sorry, I don't understand.
Digest mode can be selected by the user, right? So if you don't enable 
it, you won't get

it. How can you ignore something which isn't there?

Greets,
m



Re: Digest mode

2012-03-29 Thread george greenfield
In message 8d001425ead6b919cdaeed0ce55f3f6b-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFdd 
qzlvf5dqunbajbbxkngv10mqv13b0ttwzbeqkybx1tcrlfv-webmail...@server02.webmailer.ho
 
steurope.de
  m0n0 o...@monochrom.net wrote:

  Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2012, 11:55 +0200 schrieb george greenfield
  george.greenfi...@tiscali.co.uk:
 
 I too prefer individual messages, for same reasons as Richard states.
 I tend to ignore the digest, TBH.
 
 
  Sorry, I don't understand.
  Digest mode can be selected by the user, right? So if you don't enable
  it, you won't get
  it. How can you ignore something which isn't there?
 
  Greets,
  m
 
I did enable it; it arrives; I tend to ignore it.

George

-- 
george greenfield



Re: Digest mode

2012-03-29 Thread Dave Symes
In article
8d001425ead6b919cdaeed0ce55f3f6b-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBbXkNGV10MQV13B0tTWzBeQkYBX1tcRlFV-webmailer2@s,
   m0n0 o...@monochrom.net wrote:
  Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2012, 11:55 +0200 schrieb george greenfield 
  george.greenfi...@tiscali.co.uk:

  I too prefer individual messages, for same reasons as Richard states.
  I tend to ignore the digest, TBH.


  Sorry, I don't understand.
  Digest mode can be selected by the user, right? So if you don't enable 
  it, you won't get
  it. How can you ignore something which isn't there?

  Greets,
  m

Trouble is, a lot of folks are very bad at snipping, so when they reply to
a digest version, we none digest receivers can a get a bucket load of sh
one tee as well.

Dave

-- 

Dave Triffid



Re: Digest mode

2012-03-29 Thread george greenfield
In message 52782a9951evanal...@talktalk.net
  evanal...@talktalk.net wrote:

 In article a730017852.geo...@tiscali..co.uk, george greenfield
 george.greenfi...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
 I did enable it; it arrives; I tend to ignore it.
 
 Perhaps you ought to disable it?
 
You mean I ought to take control of my life? Steady on...

-- 
george greenfield