Re: Orpheus Home page
On 1 May 2013, Chris Young chris.yo...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk wrote: [snip] I think it is highly likely that NetSurf 3.0 has been built without JavaScript support. At present, both http://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/1/topics/1847 and the ChangeLog assert that NetSurf 3.0 offers 'early and primitive JavaScript support'. However, it would appear that this is untrue. Is it intended to rebuild NetSurf 3.0 and/or alter the ChangeLog so that they are mutually consistent? Tony
Re: Orpheus Home page
In message 3c58a64753.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk on 6 May 2013 Tony Moore old_coas...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: On 1 May 2013, Chris Young chris.yo...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk wrote: [snip] I think it is highly likely that NetSurf 3.0 has been built without JavaScript support. At present, both http://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/1/topics/1847 and the ChangeLog assert that NetSurf 3.0 offers 'early and primitive JavaScript support'. However, it would appear that this is untrue. Is it intended to rebuild NetSurf 3.0 and/or alter the ChangeLog so that they are mutually consistent? If you go to http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/ you will find that the first half of the listed builds are -jsoff- and the second half are -json- Scroll right down to the bottom to find the most recent json build. Regards Andrew -- Andrew Pinder
Re: Orpheus Home page
On 6 May 2013, Andrew Pinder andrew.pin...@tiscali.co.uk wrote: In message 3c58a64753.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk on 6 May 2013 Tony Moore old_coas...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: On 1 May 2013, Chris Young chris.yo...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk wrote: [snip] I think it is highly likely that NetSurf 3.0 has been built without JavaScript support. At present, both http://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/1/topics/1847 and the ChangeLog assert that NetSurf 3.0 offers 'early and primitive JavaScript support'. However, it would appear that this is untrue. Is it intended to rebuild NetSurf 3.0 and/or alter the ChangeLog so that they are mutually consistent? If you go to http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/ you will find that the first half of the listed builds are -jsoff- and the second half are -json- I'm aware of that - thank you. The point is that some people choose to use the stable releases, instead of the development builds. This discussion had its origin in a post to csa.apps by someone who had downloaded NetSurf 3.0 and was 'having some difficulty with its JS'. Tony
Re: Orpheus Home Page
The misunderstanding seems to persist: NS 3.0 does have JS built in. As I understand things and, as already stated before, JS is disabled when you load NS. MenuChoicesContent takes you to the selection where you can enable JS. With 3.0 you will always have to set what you want each time NS is loaded, unlike the developemnt versions which will retain the choice once selected whenever NS is subsequently reloaded. Gerald
Re: Orpheus Home Page
On 6 May 2013, Gerald Dodson gerald.dod...@argonet.co.uk wrote: The misunderstanding seems to persist: NS 3.0 does have JS built in. Chris Young, a NetSurf Developer, thinks that it is 'highly likely' that NetSurf 3.0 was compiled without JS support. Please see message 51815842.10...@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk The !RunImage size in NetSurf 3.0 is 3MB, which is the same as that of a jsoff build. The !RunImage size in a json build is 5MB. Tony
Re: Orpheus Home Page
On Mon, 6 May, 2013 7:09 pm, Gerald Dodson wrote: The misunderstanding seems to persist: NS 3.0 does have JS built in. As I understand things and, as already stated before, JS is disabled when you load NS. MenuChoicesContent takes you to the selection where you can enable JS. With 3.0 you will always have to set what you want each time NS is loaded, unlike the developemnt versions which will retain the choice once selected whenever NS is subsequently reloaded. Gerald Yes and having set that and taking into account that this is an early implementation has anyone *actually* got JS working on 3.0 - the consensus seems to be that this is (accidentally?) a JS off version despite what the documentation says and the inclusion of the on/off button. I am told 3.1 is sufficiently stable to use - any comment? John
Re: Orpheus Home Page
In message 62523.62.172.88.224.1367871663.squir...@email.orpheusnet.co.uk Learning Partners lp.bo...@argonet.co.uk wrote: I am told 3.1 is sufficiently stable to use - any comment? The development versions are almost always sufficiently stable to use, despite the dire warnings. Keep a history of a few versions, and you'll definitely be OK. Dave FREE 3D MARINE AQUARIUM SCREENSAVER - Watch dolphins, sharks orcas on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/marineaquarium
Dev Cl #1123
Site http://www.currys.co.uk/gbuk/gaming/pc-gaming-accessories/pc-gaming-accessories/gaming-mice/logitech-g400-optical-gaming-mouse-11358327-pdt.html significant differences in NetSurf rendering page from Firefox page rendering but, in particular, jpeg obscures text.
