2 sites that don't!

2016-01-26 Thread Richard Torrens (lists) 
http://www.catbehaviourist.com/sure-feed-microchip-pet-feeder-review/

http://www.zooplus.co.uk/shop/cats/cat_bowls_feeders/feeders/programmable/479534?gclid=CImfsqu3x8oCFUORGwodHCUFYQ

Both display very badly. First site all text is hidden. The source is very
over-complicated, so I can't see why.

-- 
Richard Torrens.
http://www.Torrens.org.uk for genealogy, natural history, wild food, walks, cats
and more!

Re: 2 sites that don't!

2016-01-26 Thread Richard Torrens (lists) 
In article ,
   Grahame Parish  wrote:
> Not related to the problem with the sites, but I confirm that the 
> feeders work very well.  We have several cats with different dietary  
> requirements.

Thanks - but any other discussion, off-list I think!

-- 
Richard Torrens.
http://www.Torrens.org.uk for genealogy, natural history, wild food, walks, cats
and more!

Re: 2 sites that don't!

2016-01-26 Thread Richard Torrens (lists) 
In article <145dff4755.ga...@wra1th.plus.com>,
   Gavin Wraith  wrote:
> I have a useful little Lua script, called noscript, for use with
> StrongED that strips out all the stuff between matching 
> and  tags. Here it is:

Useful: I have on occasion loked for the tags and deleted everything
between - it can be done with a StrongED search and replace. But the
script is easier.

-- 
Richard Torrens.
http://www.Torrens.org.uk for genealogy, natural history, wild food, walks, cats
and more!

Re: 2 sites that don't!

2016-01-26 Thread Jim Nagel 
Gavin Wraith  wrote on 26 Jan:

> Using it on the text of the first webpage produces source for a leaner
> webpage that reveals the hidden text. Here is the procedure:
> 1. Page->View Source in NetSurf
> 2. Save to some scrap directory.
> 3. Shift-click to load into StrongED
> 4. Shift-Drag noscript to apply icon.
> 5. Save the result and change its type to HTML.

Did that on the first web page.  Got a security warning from StrongEd 
about "process"; I said "allow always".
Then "File name '.in' not recognised".

Maybe my version of Lua is too old?  !BOOT.Resources.!Lua.version says 
5.70 (2013-08-16).

Potentially sounds like a very welcome utility.

Have often wished for a similar thing to override bothersome CSS, 
particularly CSS that specifies tiny grey text (which seems to be a 
current fashion among some designers with younger eyes than mine).

-- 
Jim Nagelwww.archivemag.co.uk

Re: 2 sites that don't!

2016-01-26 Thread cj 
In article <09d3064855@abbeypress.net>,
   Jim Nagel  wrote:
> Have often wished for a similar thing to override bothersome CSS, 
> particularly CSS that specifies tiny grey text (which seems to be a 
> current fashion among some designers with younger eyes than mine).

... and what about the latest issue of Archive  where, on page 3 you
have white text on a light ngrey background???

-- 
Chris Johnson

Re: 2 sites that don't!

2016-01-26 Thread Gavin Wraith 
In message <09d3064855@abbeypress.net>
  Jim Nagel  wrote:

>Did that on the first web page.  Got a security warning from StrongEd
>about "process"; I said "allow always".
>Then "File name '.in' not recognised".

Sounds like !StrongED$ScrapDir has not been set. See the line

Set StrongED$Script_Outfile .in

in !StrongED.Defaults.Tools.!ScriptSED.Tools.Despatch  .

--
Gavin Wraith (ga...@wra1th.plus.com)
Home page: http://www.wra1th.plus.com/

Re: 2 sites that don't!

2016-01-26 Thread Grahame Parish 
In message <5547fb845eli...@torrens.org.uk>
  "Richard Torrens (lists)"  wrote:

> http://www.catbehaviourist.com/sure-feed-microchip-pet-feeder-review/

> http://www.zooplus.co.uk/shop/cats/cat_bowls_feeders/feeders/programma
> ble/479534?gclid=CImfsqu3x8oCFUORGwodHCUFYQ

> Both display very badly. First site all text is hidden. The source is very
> over-complicated, so I can't see why.

Not related to the problem with the sites, but I confirm that the 
feeders work very well.  We have several cats with different dietary  
requirements.

-- 
Grahame Parish

Re: 2 sites that don't!

2016-01-26 Thread Gavin Wraith 
In message <5547fb845eli...@torrens.org.uk>
  "Richard Torrens (lists)"  wrote:

>http://www.catbehaviourist.com/sure-feed-microchip-pet-feeder-review/
>
>http://www.zooplus.co.uk/shop/cats/cat_bowls_feeders/feeders/programmable/479534?gclid=CImfsqu3x8oCFUORGwodHCUFYQ
>
>Both display very badly. First site all text is hidden. The source is very
>over-complicated, so I can't see why.

I have a useful little Lua script, called noscript, for use with StrongED that 
strips out all the
stuff between matching  and  tags. Here it is:

#! lua
io.input (arg[1])
local text = io.read "*all"
io.input ( )
local pat = "