nettime TRIPS was a mistake

2006-04-03 Thread Felix Stalder
[It's amazing to see that the treaty which many identify as the corner stone 
of information feudalism (Peter Drahos) is judged as a failure by one of 
it's main designers. From Ian Brown's blog, via the always excellent EDRI 
newsletter [2]. Felix]


Lehman: TRIPS was a mistake
http://dooom.blogspot.com/2006/03/lehman-trips-was-mistake.html

I'm attending a great meeting in Brussels on The Politics and Ideology of 
Intellectual Property [1]. We just had quite a newsflash from Bruce Lehman, 
President Clinton's head of intellectual property policy who was largely 
responsible for the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual 
Property Rights (TRIPS).

Lehman now believes TRIPS has been a failure for the United States, because 
the WTO agreement in which it is included opened US markets to overseas 
manufactured goods and destroyed the US manufacturing industry. He feels that 
the US has kept its part of the TRIPS bargain, but that with 90% piracy in 
China, higher-end developing nations have not. In retrospect, he feels the US 
should instead have introduced labour and environmental standards into the 
WTO agreement so that jobs would not be lost in the US manufacturing sector 
to countries with few environmental standards and weak unions.

How exhilirating that Mr Lehman agrees with civil society IP experts across 
the developed and developing world!


[1] http://www.tacd.org/docs/?id=286
[2] http://www.edri.org/






http://felix.openflows.org-- out now:
*|Manuel Castells and the Theory of the Network Society. Polity, 2006 
*|Open Cultures and the Nature of Networks. Ed. Futura/Revolver, 2005 



#  distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission
#  nettime is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and info nettime-l in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net


nettime Response to article on citizen journalism by Samuel Freedman

2006-04-03 Thread Ronda Hauben

Citizen Journalists and the New 'News'
A response to Samuel Freedman's column on CBS TV's 'Public Eye'

http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?article_class=8no=283357rel_no=1

Each week we invite someone from outside... to weigh in with their
thoughts about CBS News and the media at large, explains the introduction
on the CBS TV Web site feature Public Eye. The March 29 article featured
on Public Eye was on the subject of citizen journalism. It was written by
Samuel Freedman, a professor at the Columbia University School of
Journalism and a New York Times columnist. (1) In his article, Freedman
presents not only a superficial view of citizen journalism, but also a
rosy colored view of the mainstream professional press in the U.S.

The thrust of Freedman's argument is that citizen journalism is part of a
larger attempt to degrade, even to disenfranchise journalism as practiced
by trained professionals. Citizen journalism, according to Freedman, is
in essence the presentation of raw material generated by amateurs,
unlike the journalism of the trained, skilled journalist (who) should
know how to weigh, analyze, describe and explain.

Considering that Freedman is a professional journalist and also a
professor who is responsible for the training of professional journalists,
one might expect that he would do some investigation about the origins and
thrust of the phenomena of citizen journalism before writing an article
which not only mischaracterizes the phenomena, but also the practice of
most of the professional journalists in the U.S.




#  distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission
#  nettime is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and info nettime-l in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net