Re: Minneapolis notebook: The terribly complex environment of 2020

2020-06-05 Thread Keith Sanborn

Dear Max,

You might want to direct your call for non-violence to the police, who on live 
tv tossed tear gas into a peaceful protest, attacked journalists and 
protesters. Or to the police agents provocateurs or to the out of town Bugaloo 
crowd responsible for a lot of the  destruction. Or to organized criminal gangs 
taking advantage of the chaos. Or even to the tiny Black Block before implying 
the protesters were somehow responsible for violence and damage to property. 
Before deploring violence in blanket fashion, you might want to sort out its 
precise origins and agents.

Keith 

> On Jun 5, 2020, at 10:35 AM, Max Herman  wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Recently I made a reference to a Native American historical archive that was 
> lost in the fires last week; some context and details are here:
> 
> https://www.migizi.org/
> 
> https://www.migizi.org/post/loss-of-home
> 
> https://www.nativebusinessmag.com/migizi-set-on-fire-during-minneapolis-protests-despite-flames-we-as-a-community-burn-brighter/
> 



#  distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

Minneapolis notebook: The terribly complex environment of 2020

2020-06-05 Thread Max Herman


Hi all,

Recently I made a reference to a Native American historical archive that was 
lost in the fires last week; some context and details are here:

https://www.migizi.org/

https://www.migizi.org/post/loss-of-home

https://www.nativebusinessmag.com/migizi-set-on-fire-during-minneapolis-protests-despite-flames-we-as-a-community-burn-brighter/

I don't know how this microcosm can or should influence the debate around 
peaceful v. non-peaceful means for change.  Some say peaceful hasn't worked and 
must be jettisoned; some say non-peaceful causes too much pointless damage and 
empowers the forces of reaction.  I don't think anyone knows exactly what will 
cause what in the course of human events, much less in the present highly 
uncertain environment.

Admittedly, my own right to call for peaceful change may be zero due to my 
lifelong white privilege.  However, whatever right I do have to call for peace 
I'd like to use.  We sometimes underestimate the power of peaceful means and 
overestimate the power of non-peaceful.  But everyone will decide these 
questions for themselves, possibly in communication with others and possibly 
not.

Maybe the symbolism of fire, the most terrifying of recent events here (because 
aside from the horrific murder of George Floyd, further loss of life and injury 
to persons does not appear to have been great), has relevance.  Migizi was 
burned by accident so to speak.  Yet still, the archives were lost.  My 
perspective on this loss is worth zero or virtually zero compared to the 
statement by the organization itself.  Nevertheless, does not the very 
existence of such an organization suggest that the community that built it does 
support to some extent peaceful change?  Who knows what the right balance of 
peaceful vs. non-peaceful is.  We each have to reckon with our own value system 
and conscience on such questions.

By peace I do not mean status quo or acquiescence to injustice, nor do the many 
communities calling for peaceful change.  The murder of Mr. Floyd was extreme 
violence on all levels, and was only one visible example of such violence.  The 
institutional violence against people of color and against the economically 
disadvantaged must also end.

All this is happening, of course, within a fabric of other global collapses 
relating to Covid-19, economic production, and climate change.  Some are asking 
how peaceful change can possibly make any headway at all on these seemingly 
unavoidable catastrophes when each multiplies the other so drastically.  
Perhaps it can, perhaps it cannot.

Some characteristics of a possible path of peaceful change that can work 
effectively may be as follows:

  *   A different tone of political rhetoric from the current US 
administration.  Four years of incendiary rhetoric does add up.
  *   Work by civil society to produce the kind of healing communication not 
provided by the administration.
  *   Concrete actions related to legal reform, policing reform, and economic 
inequality supported by all citizens.
  *   Policy and legislative change to support legal and economic reforms.
  *   Stimulus funds for green infrastructure to help address both economic 
inequality and climate change.
  *   Commitment from all to slow the spread of Covid-19 so that medical 
facilities are not overwhelmed.
  *   Peaceful political change through the electoral system, specifically in 
the 2020 US elections.
  *   Dedication from every person to re-examine how they think and live, and 
to make personal changes to support the above.
  *   New approaches to art, literature, and cultural expression in light of 
the above priorities.
  *   International cooperation on all of the above, where they apply 
internationally.

Clearly, anything that can be done can also not be done; anything that can 
happen can also not happen.  Some of the above may occur, or all, or none.  
From my perspective I think they are all worth a try, and a concerted one.

Be safe and well,

Max





#  distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: