Re: Zach Blas: Metric Mysticism

2018-01-30 Thread John Hopkins
Glass *is* silicon, as is what we've been staring into, all of us, in the form 
of mediated and virtual life for quite some time now in a variety of forms that 
tend to lead us astray in our perception of the nature of reality. But this 
misperception is wider than the particular valley of silicon we've been gazing 
into recently. Consider that we've been gazing through glass for 170 years in 
the form of photography: what has that done to our perception of and interaction 
with reality?


Yet what if one were to gaze not into a crystal ball but rather a chunk of 
silicon? Not transparent glass but rather an opaque, geologic material at the 
very core of digital technology.


*Window Weather* http://neoscenes.net/blog/archives/75283 for a brief history of 
silicon dioxide, glass:


All organisms, humans included, evolve ways of modulating and attenuating the 
changing flows that are potentially harmful to them. Humans are exceptionally 
well-adapted to utilize and re-configure available flows to secure incrementally 
increased viability. In one instance they discovered that they could manipulate 
the most common forms of energized matter at the surface of the earth — silicon 
and oxygen, with bits of carbon, sodium, and calcium — to create a substance 
that was, at human scales, relatively impervious and that could constrict extant 
or generated flows in a variety of ways.


Subsequent to its discovery, glass performed a set of functions that would 
fundamentally alter the energetic relationship of humans with their environment. 
It also significantly altered social relation and the flows of energy within the 
burgeoning techno-social system (TSS). Even before human fabrication of glass, 
the sourcing of flint, chert, obsidian, and other forms of knappable lithics [1] 
was a primary influence on population location and clan/tribal viability. 
Without the enormous advantage conferred via the tools and weapons produced from 
these substances, life in the Paleolithic was severely compromised.


The precise origin of the initial human fabrication of glass is unknown, but was 
likely an accidental occurrence somewhere in Mesopotamia around 3500 BCE. Its 
utility as a robust and immutable container was eventually established and the 
technology for its production was widely spread during Roman times. Its use was 
largely restricted to a decorative substitute for precious stones outside of 
western Eurasia until the mid-18th century. Between the 14th and 18th centuries, 
the Venetians created a sophisticated production regime that raised the 
technological level substantially to include reflective (silvered) mirrors, 
complex vessels, and lenses.


The use of glass in windows -— existing in Roman times but stagnating like many 
technologies after the collapse of the Empire -— developed substantially between 
1100 and 1600. It is this particular use that surfaced when I was living in 
Reykjavik, Iceland in the 1990s:


There is a word in Icelandic “gluggaveðri” that translates literally as “window 
weather.” This suggests a kind of weather where it is much more comfortable 
sitting on the inside of the window than on the outside. Windows came to Iceland 
early, but glass was a premium commodity, so the half-underground sod huts of 
early Iceland might have only one 15 x 15 cm window set in a wooden door at one 
end of the hut. Better to be watching out this window than experiencing the 
full-bodied wrath of a winter storm, a rök [2], a storm with the power to remove 
life from the body. By putting the sheet of silicon dioxide between the body and 
the storm, a sort of virtual world appeared -― one that could be seen but not 
felt. Toasty, steamy warm inside with the sheep and ponies, death-dealing 
blizzard outside.


Anthropologist, Alan MacFarlane, tracing the history of glass forward beyond 
decorative and limited household uses, suggests that without glass there would 
never have been a scientific revolution in the Western world. The use of glass 
in a wide variety of (transparent) containers made possible a range of 
fundamental experimental situations in evolving scientific endeavor. The results 
of those experiments over time increased the precision by which humans then 
controlled flows around themselves. This control liberated even more energy for 
innovation. This, by definition, led to more optimized living, leading to more 
efficient use of available energy flows, subsequently ‘liberating’ extra energy 
to drive a cycle of knowledge propagation and further innovation.


However, the spread of the use of glass was contingent on the stable 
availability of fuels for the very energy-intensive manufacturing process. That 
proceess needs sustained temperatures above 600°C — almost as high as some 
worked metals. It also depends on a clean and controlled production environment 
and on sourcing the relatively pure silicon dioxide (usually in the form of 
clean sand) and the other chemical ingredients. 

Zach Blas: Metric Mysticism

2018-01-30 Thread Patrice Riemens

bwo Barbara Strebel, with thanks.

Full story:  
http://www.e-flux.com/program/170578/lecture-performance-zach-blas-nbsp-metric-mysticism/


In this lecture-performance, artist Zach Blas gazes into the crystal 
balls of Silicon Valley and charts the transmutation of big data into a 
magical substance that predicts—and polices—our future.


Focusing on the appropriation of mysticism and magic by Silicon Valley 
start-ups and governmental surveillance agencies alike, Blas suggests 
that the crystal ball, a transparent device that permits one to see into 
the future, has come to stand in as a paradigm for how tech 
entrepreneurs prefer to imagine the algorithmic processing of 
information.


Palantir Technologies, it is suggested, is at the forefront of such 
metric mysticism. Co-founded by Peter Thiel—and described by some as the 
most powerful machine for spying ever devised—the controversial data 
analytics company appropriates the palantir, a fictional all-seeing 
crystal ball used by wizards in The Lord of the Rings. Here, in the 
palantir, data becomes the new absolute, determining what the future is 
and how it should be controlled.


Yet what if one were to gaze not into a crystal ball but rather a chunk 
of silicon? Not transparent glass but rather an opaque, geologic 
material at the very core of digital technology. Blas asks, against the 
prediction of the future, if redirecting our gaze can offer a way to 
better comprehend the crisis of the present?


Zach Blas is an artist and writer whose practice confronts technologies 
of capture, security, and control. He is currently a Lecturer in Visual 
Cultures at Goldsmiths, University of London and has lectured and 
exhibited internationally, recently at IMA Brisbane, the Van Abbemuseum, 
Eindhoven and ICA Singapore.

#  distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: