Re: nettime The (Letter-) Post Office's last stand ... in Florida(WSJ)

2012-04-02 Thread Heiko Recktenwald

Erich M. wrote:


On 03/30/2012 01:57 PM, John Young wrote:
  

The postal system remains the most secure public communication
system for all its faults and invasive letter opening and craven
cooperation with official spies and their corporate cohorts.


Servus John et al,

Ack to all you wrote with a single exception, squire John. The first
paragraph ought to be in past tense. 


But this shows only how unrealistic you are:


I just started digging into that
topic, what I already know is: Address scanning/reading in, applying 2-D
Codes and timestamps at every stage of transportation. 


Amen!

In most cases they dont read your mail. Yes, traffic data is important, 
but it is not everything, it could be much worse.


H.


#  distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission
#  nettime  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org


Re: nettime The (Letter-) Post Office's last stand ... in Florida(WSJ)

2012-04-01 Thread Erich M.
On 03/30/2012 01:57 PM, John Young wrote:

 The postal system remains the most secure public communication
 system for all its faults and invasive letter opening and craven
 cooperation with official spies and their corporate cohorts.

Servus John et al,

Ack to all you wrote with a single exception, squire John. The first
paragraph ought to be in past tense. I just started digging into that
topic, what I already know is: Address scanning/reading in, applying 2-D
Codes and timestamps at every stage of transportation. When post office
cars or private delivery services stop in front of my house here in .AT
my signature is performed on an electronic pad.

At first sight I'd say massive datasets generated by snail mail and
packet sorting and processing systems are generously inviting companies
to spy on each other and combat competitors abroad. Analysis of delivery
cycles, timely detection of hostile marketing campaigns, tracking and
blocking delivery of goods under patent/copyright claims or whatever the
clone offsprings of ancient DMCA ACTA/TPP/SOPA/PIPA require.

What a nice topic to dig - ahem - to dive into, methinks. Not forgetting
my nose clamp I remain
humbly yours
Erich M.

 All digital comsec is faulty -- by design so its designers say to
 aid sysadministration and security/privacy updates. No official
 agency has ever had such intimate sustained access to those 
 willing to barter digital hawking-gawking for instant full-body
 cat-scan diagnosis.
 ...

-- 
http://fm4.ORF.at/erichmoechel
http://moechel.com/kontakt.htmlPGP KEY 0xEA7DC174
fingerprint 02AA B2E7 C609 307D 34FE 4B5C ACC6 A796 EA7D C174
--... ...--   -.. .   . .-. .. -.-.    --- . ...-- . -- -...


#  distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission
#  nettime  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org


nettime The (Letter-) Post Office's last stand ... in Florida (WSJ)

2012-03-30 Thread Patrice Riemens

Back in the late 90s I wrote a piece praising the then almost defunct (and
by now dead and burried?) telegraph system (*). Looks like the letter post
is headed the same way, as the digital empire is conquering the whole
communication realm. The whole communication realm? No, in Florida a small
village is resisting! ...

Cheers, p+4D!

(*) http://www.ljudmila.org/nettime/zkp4/07.htm


Original to:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304636404577297673148816412.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

(March 28, 2012)
In Florida, These Retirees Deliver a First-Class Protest
Town of Former Letter Carriers Strives to Aid Post Office; Shunning Email,
Dogs
By JENNIFER LEVITZ

NALCREST, Fla.—Lots of folks are fretting over how to save the U.S. Postal
Service, but retirees here in central Florida's citrus country are really
pushing the envelope.

A retirement community in Florida caters to retired mail carriers with the
U.S. Postal Service. WSJ's Jennifer Levitz finds many prefer mail to
email, and no dogs are allowed.

There is heavy pressure in Nalcrest, a rambling retirement community that
is its own little town, to use the U.S. mail, rather than email or
competing shipping companies, to pay bills and mail parcels to the
grandkids. We say…it's got to come through the U.S. mail or we don't want
it here, said Matty Rose, 67 years old, manager of Nalcrest.

One can't blame the town. Seventy miles east of Tampa, it's the nation's
only haven solely for retired postal service mail carriers.

The attachment to mail runs deep. Residents joke that Nalcrest, which
stands for the National Association of Letter Carriers Retirement,
Education, Security and Training, is actually short for National
Association of Letter Carriers at Rest. It has its own mailing address and
post office. A mailman statue graces the village square. There is a stamp
club, and a minigolf course, where the obstacle on the first hole isn't a
windmill but a blue mail collection box.

Carriers who spent years pounding the pavement relax under palm trees in a
kind of mail carrier bliss: no ice to tumble on, no snow to slosh through,
and best of all, no furry foes.

This is a no-dog community, said Mr. Rose, a retired mailman from
Hollywood, Fla. That's because if you're a letter carrier, you've had
experience with dogs. In my career, I was bit twice and chased about 100
times.

Now the 700 residents are fighting a new menace: the crisis enveloping the
236-year-old postal service, which is bleeding cash as technology erodes
volumes of first-class mail—and raising questions about whether
traditional mail is going the way of the buggy whip.

It stinks, said Robert Riley, 89, a former mailman from Wrentham, Mass.,
resting in a golf cart parked in Nalcrest's sun-drenched village square.

Congress is debating multiple proposals to revamp the agency, including
dropping Saturday delivery and closing thousands of post offices that are
unprofitable. A perceived assault on their beloved profession has Nalcrest
in a tizzy.

Why? Why? Then they got to make some 80- or 90-year-old woman go two or
three miles to the next post office, said Frank Wright, 70, who carried
mail in Poughkeepsie, N.Y. The post office was originally meant to be a
service to the people, not a profit-making operation.

Posted on the community bulletin board, by bingo announcements, are alerts
about the postal service's recent proposal to pull out of federal health
plans and run its own less-costly one—an idea that has retirees anxious
about their benefits. March's Nalcrest Monthly Bulletin touted softball,
horseshoes, a coming party—our past winner of musical chairs just had a
hip replaced so everyone has a chance this year—and invited everyone to
the auditorium to discuss the postal service and get on board to save
it.

They sent a 600-signature petition to Washington, by first-class mail,
against dropping Saturday delivery, and raised $350 to send to their
national union's lobbying arm. That's the money we buy off the
Congressmen with, cracked John Alversa, 72, a retired mailman from
Flushing, N.Y.

Bill LaFrana, 69, and retired from carrying mail in Lexington, Ky., has
written to Congress and his local paper back home against the postal
service's proposal to slow delivery of some mail to save money. That just
wasn't acceptable when I had to work, he said.

His girlfriend, Ellen Hollon, 72, said all the talk about the postal
service is no fun.

Every time a news blip comes up, it occupies even a barbecue…the wives
and girlfriends will finally say, 'hey,' she said, making a timeout
gesture with her hands. We don't want to hear this mailman stuff.

The retirees acknowledge the postal service must make changes to stay
afloat. They—and the postmaster general, and some members of Congress—say
one solution would be to ease an unusual requirement imposed by Congress
in 2006 that the agency aggressively fund retiree benefits decades ahead.

Supporters of the pre-funding, including U.S. Rep. Dennis Ross,