On Mittwoch, 8. November 2017 21:29:57 CET Tim Rühsen wrote: > On Mittwoch, 8. November 2017 12:44:28 CET Niels Möller wrote: > > Tim Rühsen <tim.rueh...@gmx.de> writes: > > > And of course you might be right and this is a bug in the sanitizer. > > > I leave that discussion to the experts and open a bug at oss-fuzz as > > > soon > > > as I find the time. > > > > Ok. Please add me to cc me on any related bugs, my personal address if > > that works, otherwise my work address ni...@google.com. > > Just opened an issue on Github. So i put a link here, if someone else is > interested. > > https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues/971
I just closed that bug since they agree with you that negating an unsigned type is defined. And the funny part is, those bug/issue reports (there were more on the oss- fuzz report) are gone now. Thanks for your investigation ! Regards, Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ nettle-bugs mailing list nettle-bugs@lists.lysator.liu.se http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/nettle-bugs
