Re: Bonding wifi and wired
Hi. 2016-03-08 15:55 GMT-05:00 José Queiroz : > > > 2016-03-08 14:30 GMT-03:00 Dan Williams : >> >> >> I know it's been done before, but one caveat is that the wifi driver >> and the supplicant have to correctly support setting the WiFi device's >> MAC address since bonding requires they have the same one. That's been >> a problem in the past and required fixes to the supplicant and drivers. >> But yeah, I'm sure we'd take patches fixing anything on the NM side. >> > > Hi Dan, > > And what about if NM assume this to be done based on the WiFi's MAC? This > way we could use this feature despite the drive in use... Yeah, that's exactly what I do currently. Just to clarify: this whole idea works on 'stock' ubuntu's NM since at least 14.04, and probably before that. I've setup my eth interface to clone MAC from my wifi. This way bond interface gets MAC that is equal to wifi's MAC. Without this wifi (at least one that I have) refuses properly authenticate on AP. On router side I had to enable wifi clients isolation and LAN bridge hairpin so two bonded clients can properly talk to each other and other AP clients. Things work in a sense that I can pull the plug out of laptop during hangout call and not notice anything, and I can put it back in and see traffic flowing on wire. But NM's clearly gets confused by this setu. But since it sounds like NM's team would welcome patches I hope I will be able to address some of those problems. -- Martynov Nikolay. Email: mar.ko...@gmail.com ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: Bonding wifi and wired
2016-03-08 14:30 GMT-03:00 Dan Williams : > > I know it's been done before, but one caveat is that the wifi driver > and the supplicant have to correctly support setting the WiFi device's > MAC address since bonding requires they have the same one. That's been > a problem in the past and required fixes to the supplicant and drivers. > But yeah, I'm sure we'd take patches fixing anything on the NM side. > > Hi Dan, And what about if NM assume this to be done based on the WiFi's MAC? This way we could use this feature despite the drive in use... ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: Bonding wifi and wired
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 10:50 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 23:34 -0500, Nikolay Martynov wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > I just wanted to reach out to ask what's NetworkManager team's > > position on allowing bonding of wifi and wired interface? Are there > > any plans to support this? If not - it is due to no one being > > interested implementing it or because this feature would go against > > some large plans/ideology? > > > > I was able to make it work with NM on client side and OpenWRT on > > router side. Router side is easy. On NM side there is some manual > > config editing (which is fine) and some kinds that make day-to-day > > life less enjoyable than it should (like inability to manually > > connect > > to bonded wifi). SO I was curious - would patches fixing those > > smaller > > kinks be acceptable at all or is it something that NM team is just > > not > > interested in? > > > I'm not familiar with the quirks of bonding of Wi-Fi and ethernet. > > Anyway, we are definitely interested in supporting all kind of use- > cases and patches are always welcome :) I know it's been done before, but one caveat is that the wifi driver and the supplicant have to correctly support setting the WiFi device's MAC address since bonding requires they have the same one. That's been a problem in the past and required fixes to the supplicant and drivers. But yeah, I'm sure we'd take patches fixing anything on the NM side. Dan ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: Bonding wifi and wired
On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 23:34 -0500, Nikolay Martynov wrote: > Hi. > > I just wanted to reach out to ask what's NetworkManager team's > position on allowing bonding of wifi and wired interface? Are there > any plans to support this? If not - it is due to no one being > interested implementing it or because this feature would go against > some large plans/ideology? > > I was able to make it work with NM on client side and OpenWRT on > router side. Router side is easy. On NM side there is some manual > config editing (which is fine) and some kinds that make day-to-day > life less enjoyable than it should (like inability to manually > connect > to bonded wifi). SO I was curious - would patches fixing those > smaller > kinks be acceptable at all or is it something that NM team is just > not > interested in? > I'm not familiar with the quirks of bonding of Wi-Fi and ethernet. Anyway, we are definitely interested in supporting all kind of use- cases and patches are always welcome :) Thomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Bonding wifi and wired
Hi. I just wanted to reach out to ask what's NetworkManager team's position on allowing bonding of wifi and wired interface? Are there any plans to support this? If not - it is due to no one being interested implementing it or because this feature would go against some large plans/ideology? I was able to make it work with NM on client side and OpenWRT on router side. Router side is easy. On NM side there is some manual config editing (which is fine) and some kinds that make day-to-day life less enjoyable than it should (like inability to manually connect to bonded wifi). SO I was curious - would patches fixing those smaller kinks be acceptable at all or is it something that NM team is just not interested in? Thanks! -- Martynov Nikolay. Email: mar.ko...@gmail.com ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list