Re: format and output all received: lines in an e-mail message
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 20:51:52 +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso said: > I prefer people using Mail-Followup-To: instead of some ML > software modifying the address lists, they could as well just > avoid resending the mail!?! Yes, i mean, well. > I really like looking into old archives and i hope what i see is > the real original thing, which i think is a value by itself. > But the world does not seem to cherish this. A bigger issue is GMail's handling of Message-Id: If you post to a mailing list, it notes the Message-Id: on the way out, and when the list sends its copy to you, it gets silently munched by the duplicate suppressor. So unless you are careful with Fcc: and have nmh save a copy in the appropriate folder, your comments in a thread go poof. pgpGvEg27G0Er.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: format and output all received: lines in an e-mail message
>Curiously, the email you sent me appears to have never arrived via the >MLM that nmh-workers uses---I suspect it has one of those fancy features >that thinks an email that was sent to one address shouldn't be also sent >to another address (i.e. if the address of the To/Cc recipient is also a >member of the MLM exclude one of them). As far as I know our mailing list software (hosted by savannah) does not have such a feature; I see double-replies of messages and my own messages sent to me on the mailing list. --Ken
Re: format and output all received: lines in an e-mail message
Andy Bradford wrote in <20191122084003.18170.qmail@angmar.bradfordfamily\ .org>: |Thus said Steffen Nurpmeso on Thu, 21 Nov 2019 23:14:29 +0100: |> I have heared someone revived qmail and wants to include some patches |> for builtin TLS etc. That sounded very much interesting, especially if |> its mailing-list manager would be maintained again! | |There has been some momentum around creating a newer version that has a |forward path. I imagine there are still some diehards out there like me |who just continue to use the original software (mine is minimally |patched for example) because it "just works." It was notqmail.. Not touched in a few months. Well. |I still use unpatched ezmlm for my own personal uses for the same |reasons, though I have added an extra binary; but the rest of the |additional things that were added to it I haven't needed. I was thinking about that when i practically had to move away from Sourceforge, since Unicode.org used it for many years, and i had no rememberance of any issue (except seeing never seen From_ quoting via space not >). (Not that i remember any issues after their switch to Mailman.) I did not dare to go that route by then. |Curiously, the email you sent me appears to have never arrived via the |MLM that nmh-workers uses---I suspect it has one of those fancy features |that thinks an email that was sent to one address shouldn't be also sent |to another address (i.e. if the address of the To/Cc recipient is also a |member of the MLM exclude one of them). Personally, I prefer to |distinguish between direct replies and replies via MLM so I don't mind |the extra because my filters funnel things appropriately. That must be your very personal Mailman config then, or? Well, hmmm .. I prefer people using Mail-Followup-To: instead of some ML software modifying the address lists, they could as well just avoid resending the mail!?! Yes, i mean, well. I really like looking into old archives and i hope what i see is the real original thing, which i think is a value by itself. But the world does not seem to cherish this. A nice weekend! --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)
Re: format and output all received: lines in an e-mail message
Thus said Steffen Nurpmeso on Thu, 21 Nov 2019 23:14:29 +0100: > I have heared someone revived qmail and wants to include some patches > for builtin TLS etc. That sounded very much interesting, especially if > its mailing-list manager would be maintained again! There has been some momentum around creating a newer version that has a forward path. I imagine there are still some diehards out there like me who just continue to use the original software (mine is minimally patched for example) because it "just works." I still use unpatched ezmlm for my own personal uses for the same reasons, though I have added an extra binary; but the rest of the additional things that were added to it I haven't needed. Curiously, the email you sent me appears to have never arrived via the MLM that nmh-workers uses---I suspect it has one of those fancy features that thinks an email that was sent to one address shouldn't be also sent to another address (i.e. if the address of the To/Cc recipient is also a member of the MLM exclude one of them). Personally, I prefer to distinguish between direct replies and replies via MLM so I don't mind the extra because my filters funnel things appropriately. Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 40005dd80178
