Re: nmh 1.8-RC3?

2023-02-17 Thread Ken Hornstein 
>> Has anyone tried 1.8-RC3 on a BSD platform?  If good, any objection to
>> releasing 1.8 soon?
>
>Unless there's an objection or discovery of a problem, I'd like to
>release 1.8 this weekend.

Just a minor note: I tested nmh 1.8-RC3 on MacOS X (which I know was
already tested) but I also tested GSSAPI/TLS support for sending/receiving
(TLS was tested with OpenSSL 3).  Works fine!  I see no reason to not
release 1.8.

--Ken

Re: nmh 1.8-RC3?

2023-02-17 Thread David Levine 
Simon wrote:

> I did some really basic testing (scan, show, repl) on NetBSD x86
> as well as a "make check" and got:
>
> ==
> All 112 tests passed
> (7 tests were not run)
> ==

Thank you!  It really helps to have the NetBSD coverage.

David

Re: nmh 1.8-RC3?

2023-02-16 Thread Simon Burge 
Hi David,

David Levine wrote:

> I wrote:
>
> > Has anyone tried 1.8-RC3 on a BSD platform?  If good, any objection to
> > releasing 1.8 soon?
>
> Unless there's an objection or discovery of a problem, I'd like to
> release 1.8 this weekend.

I did some really basic testing (scan, show, repl) on NetBSD x86
as well as a "make check" and got:

==
All 112 tests passed
(7 tests were not run)
==

Cheers,
Simon.

Re: nmh 1.8-RC3?

2023-02-16 Thread David Levine 
I wrote:

> Has anyone tried 1.8-RC3 on a BSD platform?  If good, any objection to
> releasing 1.8 soon?

Unless there's an objection or discovery of a problem, I'd like to
release 1.8 this weekend.

David


> https://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/nmh/nmh-1.8-RC3.tar.gz

nmh 1.8-RC3?

2023-02-11 Thread David Levine 
Has anyone tried 1.8-RC3 on a BSD platform?  If good, any objection to
releasing 1.8 soon?

It looks good on Red Hat and Debian Linux, MacOS, Solaris 11, and Cygwin.

https://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/nmh/nmh-1.8-RC3.tar.gz

Thanks!

David