DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45902] Up-to-date checks for JARs broken due to comparison of dir timestamps
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902 --- Comment #8 from Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org 2009-07-15 03:32:57 PST --- svn revision 794215 ( https://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?view=revrev=794215 ) should fix the dir timestamp issue for all except for the same directory comes from multiple sources case - which we have in our AntUnit test so it still fails. The problem with directories from multiple sources is that Ant only adds the first directory encountered - and now preserves that timestamp - but may later find there are more recent directories in other places. The way I intend to work on this is to perform some global sort on all directory resources making sure they get added in the right order and only the most recent timestamps get recorded - this is going to take some additional plumbing. The same issue could come up with file timestamps but is less likely o happen since archives with multiple entries for the same file are less common (and you get a warning message in verbose mode anyway). -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45902] Up-to-date checks for JARs broken due to comparison of dir timestamps
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #9 from Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org 2009-07-15 06:11:36 PST --- After coding the logic described in comment #8 I realized it was complicating the task even more, so I settled with a more humble goal. svn revision 794255 ( https://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?view=revrev=794255 ) (which will be followed by an extract method refactoring) will compare file timestamps and recreate the archive if new directories have been added. It will record a directories timestamp but not compare it with the dir timestamps when updating an archive. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45902] Up-to-date checks for JARs broken due to comparison of dir timestamps
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902 Jay Berkenbilt e...@ql.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||e...@ql.org --- Comment #6 from Jay Berkenbilt e...@ql.org 2009-05-25 13:52:27 PST --- For what it's worth, I think I have a simpler way to reproduce this. Create a/dir/1 and b/dir/2 Then run ant twice with this build.xml: project default=default target name=default jar destfile=a.jar fileset dir=a/ fileset dir=b/ /jar /target /project With 1.7.0, the second ant does correctly does nothing. Verbose output: [jar] dir omitted as /home/jberkenb/tmp/z/a.jar:dir/ is up to date. [jar] dir/1 omitted as /home/jberkenb/tmp/z/a.jar:dir/1 is up to date. [jar] dir omitted as /home/jberkenb/tmp/z/a.jar:dir/ is up to date. [jar] dir/2 omitted as /home/jberkenb/tmp/z/a.jar:dir/2 is up to date. With 1.7.1, the second ant rebuilds: [jar] dir omitted as /home/jberkenb/tmp/z/a.jar:dir/ is up to date. [jar] dir/1 omitted as /home/jberkenb/tmp/z/a.jar:dir/1 is up to date. [jar] dir added as dir/ is outdated. [jar] dir/2 omitted as /home/jberkenb/tmp/z/a.jar:dir/2 is up to date. [jar] Building jar: /home/jberkenb/tmp/z/a.jar [jar] adding directory META-INF/ [jar] adding entry META-INF/MANIFEST.MF [jar] adding directory dir/ [jar] adding entry dir/1 [jar] adding entry dir/2 Notice that the second time dir is checked, ant 1.7.1 just says that dir/ is outdated, while ant 1.7.0 reports that /home/jberkenb/tmp/z/a.jar:dir/ is up to date. My current directory is /home/jberkenb/tmp/z as I run this I'm not sure whether this is a manifestation of the same bug, but it would be great to see if it works with the fix applied to correct this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45902] Up-to-date checks for JARs broken due to comparison of dir timestamps
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902 --- Comment #7 from Jay Berkenbilt e...@ql.org 2009-05-25 13:56:11 PST --- Most likely you can just disregard my comment. I see the posted test case is doing the same thing with the multiple jar tasks and creation of files/directories called from the test case. My observation is that the problem happens when the same directory is added from two different filesets. I'm not sure that explicit observation is of any use or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45902] Up-to-date checks for JARs broken due to comparison of dir timestamps
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902 Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebo...@apache.org -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45902] Up-to-date checks for JARs broken due to comparison of dir timestamps
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ken.cor...@hp.com --- Comment #5 from Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org 2009-01-29 07:03:22 PST --- *** Bug 29683 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45902] Up-to-date checks for JARs broken due to comparison of dir timestamps
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #3 from Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org 2009-01-28 01:23:06 PST --- I have a few issues that I'm going to raise on the dev list. I've created an AntUnit test from your testcase: svn revision 738412 ( https://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?view=revrev=738412 ) -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45902] Up-to-date checks for JARs broken due to comparison of dir timestamps
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902 Jesse Glick jgl...@netbeans.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |1.8.0 --- Comment #2 from Jesse Glick jgl...@netbeans.org 2009-01-27 17:17:41 PST --- I think fixed in SVN rev 738330. Reviews welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45902] Up-to-date checks for JARs broken due to comparison of dir timestamps
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902 Michel Graciano [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
