[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8753) Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction selection'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16586679#comment-16586679
]
Patric Bechtel commented on GROOVY-8753:
Strike :)
That did the trick. Checking the docs, this cache even survives a clean... wtf?
Isn't there a trick to make clean drop the build cache, too?
Thanks a lot, though. Am I the only one ever stumbled over that?
> Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction selection'
> -
>
> Key: GROOVY-8753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8753
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.5.2
> Environment: Java 8u181, Ubuntu 18.04
>Reporter: Patric Bechtel
>Assignee: Paul King
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-4, 2.5.3
>
>
> Following source compiles under 2.5.1 and 3.0alpha3, but not 2.5.2:
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class A {
> private List fooNames = []
> public A(Collection names) {
> names.each { fooNames << it }
> }
> public List getFooNames() { fooNames }
> }
> {code}
> error message is:
> {noformat}
> >>> a serious error occurred: BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection'
> >>> in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried to overwrite existing meta data
> >>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
> >>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
> >>> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
> >>> stacktrace:
> BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection' in source unit 'A.groovy'
> Tried to overwrite existing meta data
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
> at org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ASTNode.setNodeMetaData(ASTNode.java:154)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.checkOrMarkPrivateAccess(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:501)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.storeField(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1711)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1473)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.sc.StaticCompilationVisitor.existsProperty(StaticCompilationVisitor.java:522)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1381)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitPropertyExpressionSilent(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:726)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.tryVariableExpressionAsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:711)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitVariableExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:630)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression.visit(VariableExpression.java:72)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitBinaryExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:785)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.BinaryExpression.visit(BinaryExpression.java:51)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitExpressionStatement(CodeVisitorSupport.java:122)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassCodeVisitorSupport.visitExpressionStatement(ClassCodeVisitorSupport.java:197)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.stmt.ExpressionStatement.visit(ExpressionStatement.java:42)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitBlockStatement(CodeVisitorSupport.java:88)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassCodeVisitorSupport.visitBlockStatement(ClassCodeVisitorSupport.java:106)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitBlockStatement(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:3628)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.stmt.BlockStatement.visit(BlockStatement.java:71)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitClosureExpression(CodeVisitorSupport.java:227)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitClosureExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:2286)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.ClosureExpression.visit(ClosureExpression.java:49)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitMethodCallArguments(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:2596)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitMethodCallExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:3286)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.sc.StaticCompilationVisitor.visitMethodCallExpression(StaticCompilationVisitor.java:397)
> at
>
[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-8753) Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction selection'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16586631#comment-16586631
]
Patric Bechtel edited comment on GROOVY-8753 at 8/20/18 11:01 PM:
--
Just tried:
{noformat}
LANG=C git status{noformat}
{noformat}
On branch GROOVY_2_5_X
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/GROOVY_2_5_X'.
Untracked files:
(use "git add ..." to include in what will be committed)
A.groovy
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
{noformat}
{noformat}
git pull; ./gradlew clean; ./gradlew installGroovy;
{noformat}
{noformat}
java -cp target/install/lib/groovy-2.5.3-SNAPSHOT.jar
org.codehaus.groovy.tools.FileSystemCompiler A.groovy{noformat}
results in
{noformat}
>>> a serious error occurred: BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection'
>>> in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried to overwrite existing meta data
>>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
>>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
>>> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
>>> stacktrace:
BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection' in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried
to overwrite existing meta data
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this] property:
ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
at org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ASTNode.setNodeMetaData(ASTNode.java:154)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.checkOrMarkPrivateAccess(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:501)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.storeField(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1711)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1473)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.sc.StaticCompilationVisitor.existsProperty(StaticCompilationVisitor.java:522)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1381)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitPropertyExpressionSilent(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:726)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.tryVariableExpressionAsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:711)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitVariableExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:630)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression.visit(VariableExpression.java:72)
{noformat}
Oracle Java 8u181, Ubuntu 18.04.
*sigh*... wtf?
was (Author: patric42):
Just tried:
{noformat}
LANG=C git status{noformat}
{noformat}
On branch GROOVY_2_5_X
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/GROOVY_2_5_X'.
Untracked files:
(use "git add ..." to include in what will be committed)
A.groovy
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
{noformat}
{noformat}
git pull; ./gradlew clean; gradlew installGroovy;
{noformat}
{noformat}
java -cp target/install/lib/groovy-2.5.3-SNAPSHOT.jar
org.codehaus.groovy.tools.FileSystemCompiler A.groovy{noformat}
results in
{noformat}
>>> a serious error occurred: BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection'
>>> in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried to overwrite existing meta data
>>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
>>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
>>> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
>>> stacktrace:
BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection' in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried
to overwrite existing meta data
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this] property:
ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
at org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ASTNode.setNodeMetaData(ASTNode.java:154)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.checkOrMarkPrivateAccess(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:501)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.storeField(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1711)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1473)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.sc.StaticCompilationVisitor.existsProperty(StaticCompilationVisitor.java:522)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1381)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitPropertyExpressionSilent(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:726)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.tryVariableExpressionAsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:711)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitVariableExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:630)
at
[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-8753) Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction selection'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16586631#comment-16586631
]
Patric Bechtel edited comment on GROOVY-8753 at 8/20/18 11:00 PM:
--
Just tried:
{noformat}
LANG=C git status{noformat}
{noformat}
On branch GROOVY_2_5_X
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/GROOVY_2_5_X'.
Untracked files:
(use "git add ..." to include in what will be committed)
A.groovy
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
{noformat}
{noformat}
git pull; ./gradlew clean; gradlew installGroovy;
{noformat}
{noformat}
java -cp target/install/lib/groovy-2.5.3-SNAPSHOT.jar
org.codehaus.groovy.tools.FileSystemCompiler A.groovy{noformat}
results in
{noformat}
>>> a serious error occurred: BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection'
>>> in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried to overwrite existing meta data
>>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
>>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
>>> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
>>> stacktrace:
BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection' in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried
to overwrite existing meta data
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this] property:
ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
at org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ASTNode.setNodeMetaData(ASTNode.java:154)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.checkOrMarkPrivateAccess(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:501)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.storeField(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1711)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1473)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.sc.StaticCompilationVisitor.existsProperty(StaticCompilationVisitor.java:522)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1381)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitPropertyExpressionSilent(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:726)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.tryVariableExpressionAsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:711)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitVariableExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:630)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression.visit(VariableExpression.java:72)
{noformat}
Oracle Java 8u181, Ubuntu 18.04.
*sigh*... wtf?
was (Author: patric42):
Just tried:
{noformat}
git pull; ./gradlew clean; gradlew installGroovy;
java -cp target/install/lib/groovy-2.5.3-SNAPSHOT.jar
org.codehaus.groovy.tools.FileSystemCompiler A.groov{noformat}
results in
{noformat}
>>> a serious error occurred: BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection'
>>> in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried to overwrite existing meta data
>>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
>>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
>>> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
>>> stacktrace:
BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection' in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried
to overwrite existing meta data
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this] property:
ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
at org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ASTNode.setNodeMetaData(ASTNode.java:154)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.checkOrMarkPrivateAccess(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:501)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.storeField(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1711)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1473)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.sc.StaticCompilationVisitor.existsProperty(StaticCompilationVisitor.java:522)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1381)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitPropertyExpressionSilent(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:726)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.tryVariableExpressionAsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:711)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitVariableExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:630)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression.visit(VariableExpression.java:72)
{noformat}
Oracle Java 8u181, Ubuntu 18.04.
*sigh*... wtf?
> Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction selection'
> -
>
> Key: GROOVY-8753
>
[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8753) Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction selection'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16586631#comment-16586631
]
Patric Bechtel commented on GROOVY-8753:
Just tried:
{noformat}
git pull; ./gradlew clean; gradlew installGroovy;
java -cp target/install/lib/groovy-2.5.3-SNAPSHOT.jar
org.codehaus.groovy.tools.FileSystemCompiler A.groov{noformat}
results in
{noformat}
>>> a serious error occurred: BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection'
>>> in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried to overwrite existing meta data
>>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
>>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
>>> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
>>> stacktrace:
BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection' in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried
to overwrite existing meta data
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this] property:
ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
at org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ASTNode.setNodeMetaData(ASTNode.java:154)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.checkOrMarkPrivateAccess(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:501)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.storeField(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1711)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1473)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.sc.StaticCompilationVisitor.existsProperty(StaticCompilationVisitor.java:522)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1381)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitPropertyExpressionSilent(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:726)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.tryVariableExpressionAsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:711)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitVariableExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:630)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression.visit(VariableExpression.java:72)
{noformat}
Oracle Java 8u181, Ubuntu 18.04.
*sigh*... wtf?
> Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction selection'
> -
>
> Key: GROOVY-8753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8753
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.5.2
> Environment: Java 8u181, Ubuntu 18.04
>Reporter: Patric Bechtel
>Assignee: Paul King
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-4, 2.5.3
>
>
> Following source compiles under 2.5.1 and 3.0alpha3, but not 2.5.2:
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class A {
> private List fooNames = []
> public A(Collection names) {
> names.each { fooNames << it }
> }
> public List getFooNames() { fooNames }
> }
> {code}
> error message is:
> {noformat}
> >>> a serious error occurred: BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection'
> >>> in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried to overwrite existing meta data
> >>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
> >>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
> >>> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
> >>> stacktrace:
> BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection' in source unit 'A.groovy'
> Tried to overwrite existing meta data
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
> at org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ASTNode.setNodeMetaData(ASTNode.java:154)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.checkOrMarkPrivateAccess(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:501)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.storeField(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1711)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1473)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.sc.StaticCompilationVisitor.existsProperty(StaticCompilationVisitor.java:522)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1381)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitPropertyExpressionSilent(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:726)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.tryVariableExpressionAsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:711)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitVariableExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:630)
>
[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8753) Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction selection'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16585743#comment-16585743
]
Patric Bechtel commented on GROOVY-8753:
Ack - the test in the pull request works.
The test on from the shell, via
{noformat}
java -cp groovy/target/libs/groovy-2.5.3-SNAPSHOT.jar
org.codehaus.groovy.tools.FileSystemCompiler A.groovy{noformat}
doesn't.
> Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction selection'
> -
>
> Key: GROOVY-8753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8753
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.5.2
> Environment: Java 8u181, Ubuntu 18.04
>Reporter: Patric Bechtel
>Assignee: Paul King
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-4, 2.5.3
>
>
> Following source compiles under 2.5.1 and 3.0alpha3, but not 2.5.2:
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class A {
> private List fooNames = []
> public A(Collection names) {
> names.each { fooNames << it }
> }
> public List getFooNames() { fooNames }
> }
> {code}
> error message is:
> {noformat}
> >>> a serious error occurred: BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection'
> >>> in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried to overwrite existing meta data
> >>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
> >>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
> >>> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
> >>> stacktrace:
> BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection' in source unit 'A.groovy'
> Tried to overwrite existing meta data
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
> at org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ASTNode.setNodeMetaData(ASTNode.java:154)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.checkOrMarkPrivateAccess(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:501)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.storeField(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1711)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1473)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.sc.StaticCompilationVisitor.existsProperty(StaticCompilationVisitor.java:522)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1381)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitPropertyExpressionSilent(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:726)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.tryVariableExpressionAsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:711)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitVariableExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:630)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression.visit(VariableExpression.java:72)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitBinaryExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:785)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.BinaryExpression.visit(BinaryExpression.java:51)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitExpressionStatement(CodeVisitorSupport.java:122)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassCodeVisitorSupport.visitExpressionStatement(ClassCodeVisitorSupport.java:197)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.stmt.ExpressionStatement.visit(ExpressionStatement.java:42)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitBlockStatement(CodeVisitorSupport.java:88)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassCodeVisitorSupport.visitBlockStatement(ClassCodeVisitorSupport.java:106)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitBlockStatement(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:3628)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.stmt.BlockStatement.visit(BlockStatement.java:71)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitClosureExpression(CodeVisitorSupport.java:227)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitClosureExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:2286)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.ClosureExpression.visit(ClosureExpression.java:49)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitMethodCallArguments(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:2596)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitMethodCallExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:3286)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.sc.StaticCompilationVisitor.visitMethodCallExpression(StaticCompilationVisitor.java:397)
> at
>
[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-8753) Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction selection'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16585586#comment-16585586
]
Patric Bechtel edited comment on GROOVY-8753 at 8/20/18 8:04 AM:
-
I should add something. While trying to reproduce the bug, the (ugly) line
{code:java}
names.each { fooNames << it }
{code}
is important. Replacing that line by the (much nicer)
{code:java}
fooNames.addAll( names )
{code}
it works.
That might give a clue where this comes from...
was (Author: patric42):
I should add something. While trying to reproduce the bug, the (ugly) line
{code:java}
names.each { fooNames << it }
{code}
is important. Replacing that line by the (much nicer) line
{code:java}
fooNames.addAll( names )
{code}
it works.
That might give a clue where this comes from...
> Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction selection'
> -
>
> Key: GROOVY-8753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8753
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.5.2
> Environment: Java 8u181, Ubuntu 18.04
>Reporter: Patric Bechtel
>Assignee: Paul King
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-4, 2.5.3
>
>
> Following source compiles under 2.5.1 and 3.0alpha3, but not 2.5.2:
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class A {
> private List fooNames = []
> public A(Collection names) {
> names.each { fooNames << it }
> }
> public List getFooNames() { fooNames }
> }
> {code}
> error message is:
> {noformat}
> >>> a serious error occurred: BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection'
> >>> in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried to overwrite existing meta data
> >>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
> >>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
> >>> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
> >>> stacktrace:
> BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection' in source unit 'A.groovy'
> Tried to overwrite existing meta data
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
> at org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ASTNode.setNodeMetaData(ASTNode.java:154)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.checkOrMarkPrivateAccess(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:501)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.storeField(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1711)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1473)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.sc.StaticCompilationVisitor.existsProperty(StaticCompilationVisitor.java:522)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1381)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitPropertyExpressionSilent(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:726)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.tryVariableExpressionAsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:711)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitVariableExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:630)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression.visit(VariableExpression.java:72)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitBinaryExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:785)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.BinaryExpression.visit(BinaryExpression.java:51)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitExpressionStatement(CodeVisitorSupport.java:122)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassCodeVisitorSupport.visitExpressionStatement(ClassCodeVisitorSupport.java:197)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.stmt.ExpressionStatement.visit(ExpressionStatement.java:42)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitBlockStatement(CodeVisitorSupport.java:88)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassCodeVisitorSupport.visitBlockStatement(ClassCodeVisitorSupport.java:106)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitBlockStatement(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:3628)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.stmt.BlockStatement.visit(BlockStatement.java:71)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitClosureExpression(CodeVisitorSupport.java:227)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitClosureExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:2286)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.ClosureExpression.visit(ClosureExpression.java:49)
> at
>
[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8753) Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction selection'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16585586#comment-16585586
]
Patric Bechtel commented on GROOVY-8753:
I should add something. While trying to reproduce the bug, the (ugly) line
{code:java}
names.each { fooNames << it }
{code}
is important. Replacing that line by the (much nicer) line
{code:java}
fooNames.addAll( names )
{code}
it works.
That might give a clue where this comes from...
> Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction selection'
> -
>
> Key: GROOVY-8753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8753
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.5.2
> Environment: Java 8u181, Ubuntu 18.04
>Reporter: Patric Bechtel
>Assignee: Paul King
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-4, 2.5.3
>
>
> Following source compiles under 2.5.1 and 3.0alpha3, but not 2.5.2:
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class A {
> private List fooNames = []
> public A(Collection names) {
> names.each { fooNames << it }
> }
> public List getFooNames() { fooNames }
> }
> {code}
> error message is:
> {noformat}
> >>> a serious error occurred: BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection'
> >>> in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried to overwrite existing meta data
> >>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
> >>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
> >>> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
> >>> stacktrace:
> BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection' in source unit 'A.groovy'
> Tried to overwrite existing meta data
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
> at org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ASTNode.setNodeMetaData(ASTNode.java:154)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.checkOrMarkPrivateAccess(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:501)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.storeField(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1711)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1473)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.sc.StaticCompilationVisitor.existsProperty(StaticCompilationVisitor.java:522)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1381)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitPropertyExpressionSilent(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:726)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.tryVariableExpressionAsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:711)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitVariableExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:630)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression.visit(VariableExpression.java:72)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitBinaryExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:785)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.BinaryExpression.visit(BinaryExpression.java:51)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitExpressionStatement(CodeVisitorSupport.java:122)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassCodeVisitorSupport.visitExpressionStatement(ClassCodeVisitorSupport.java:197)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.stmt.ExpressionStatement.visit(ExpressionStatement.java:42)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitBlockStatement(CodeVisitorSupport.java:88)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassCodeVisitorSupport.visitBlockStatement(ClassCodeVisitorSupport.java:106)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitBlockStatement(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:3628)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.stmt.BlockStatement.visit(BlockStatement.java:71)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitClosureExpression(CodeVisitorSupport.java:227)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitClosureExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:2286)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.ClosureExpression.visit(ClosureExpression.java:49)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitMethodCallArguments(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:2596)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitMethodCallExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:3286)
> at
>
[jira] [Reopened] (GROOVY-8753) Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction selection'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Patric Bechtel reopened GROOVY-8753:
I just verified with a build from bf37aa58f97b51081fba355c5ef4356d569af68a;
Still doesn't work, the error message is identical.
> Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction selection'
> -
>
> Key: GROOVY-8753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8753
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.5.2
> Environment: Java 8u181, Ubuntu 18.04
>Reporter: Patric Bechtel
>Assignee: Paul King
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-4, 2.5.3
>
>
> Following source compiles under 2.5.1 and 3.0alpha3, but not 2.5.2:
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class A {
> private List fooNames = []
> public A(Collection names) {
> names.each { fooNames << it }
> }
> public List getFooNames() { fooNames }
> }
> {code}
> error message is:
> {noformat}
> >>> a serious error occurred: BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection'
> >>> in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried to overwrite existing meta data
> >>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
> >>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
> >>> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
> >>> stacktrace:
> BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection' in source unit 'A.groovy'
> Tried to overwrite existing meta data
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
> at org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ASTNode.setNodeMetaData(ASTNode.java:154)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.checkOrMarkPrivateAccess(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:501)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.storeField(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1711)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1473)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.sc.StaticCompilationVisitor.existsProperty(StaticCompilationVisitor.java:522)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1381)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitPropertyExpressionSilent(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:726)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.tryVariableExpressionAsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:711)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitVariableExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:630)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression.visit(VariableExpression.java:72)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitBinaryExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:785)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.BinaryExpression.visit(BinaryExpression.java:51)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitExpressionStatement(CodeVisitorSupport.java:122)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassCodeVisitorSupport.visitExpressionStatement(ClassCodeVisitorSupport.java:197)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.stmt.ExpressionStatement.visit(ExpressionStatement.java:42)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitBlockStatement(CodeVisitorSupport.java:88)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassCodeVisitorSupport.visitBlockStatement(ClassCodeVisitorSupport.java:106)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitBlockStatement(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:3628)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.stmt.BlockStatement.visit(BlockStatement.java:71)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitClosureExpression(CodeVisitorSupport.java:227)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitClosureExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:2286)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.ClosureExpression.visit(ClosureExpression.java:49)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitMethodCallArguments(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:2596)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitMethodCallExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:3286)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.transform.sc.StaticCompilationVisitor.visitMethodCallExpression(StaticCompilationVisitor.java:397)
> at
> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.MethodCallExpression.visit(MethodCallExpression.java:70)
> at
>
[jira] [Created] (GROOVY-8753) Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction selection'
Patric Bechtel created GROOVY-8753:
--
Summary: Compiler error in STC: exception in phase 'instruction
selection'
Key: GROOVY-8753
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8753
Project: Groovy
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Static compilation
Affects Versions: 2.5.2
Environment: Java 8u181, Ubuntu 18.04
Reporter: Patric Bechtel
Following source compiles under 2.5.1 and 3.0alpha3, but not 2.5.2:
{code:java}
@groovy.transform.CompileStatic
class A {
private List fooNames = []
public A(Collection names) {
names.each { fooNames << it }
}
public List getFooNames() { fooNames }
}
{code}
error message is:
{noformat}
>>> a serious error occurred: BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection'
>>> in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried to overwrite existing meta data
>>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
>>> org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this]
>>> property: ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
>>> stacktrace:
BUG! exception in phase 'instruction selection' in source unit 'A.groovy' Tried
to overwrite existing meta data
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.PropertyExpression@d9f41[object:
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression@d9f41[variable: this] property:
ConstantExpression[fooNames]].
at org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ASTNode.setNodeMetaData(ASTNode.java:154)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.checkOrMarkPrivateAccess(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:501)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.storeField(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1711)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1473)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.sc.StaticCompilationVisitor.existsProperty(StaticCompilationVisitor.java:522)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.existsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:1381)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitPropertyExpressionSilent(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:726)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.tryVariableExpressionAsProperty(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:711)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitVariableExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:630)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.VariableExpression.visit(VariableExpression.java:72)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitBinaryExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:785)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.BinaryExpression.visit(BinaryExpression.java:51)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitExpressionStatement(CodeVisitorSupport.java:122)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassCodeVisitorSupport.visitExpressionStatement(ClassCodeVisitorSupport.java:197)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.stmt.ExpressionStatement.visit(ExpressionStatement.java:42)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitBlockStatement(CodeVisitorSupport.java:88)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassCodeVisitorSupport.visitBlockStatement(ClassCodeVisitorSupport.java:106)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitBlockStatement(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:3628)
at org.codehaus.groovy.ast.stmt.BlockStatement.visit(BlockStatement.java:71)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitClosureExpression(CodeVisitorSupport.java:227)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitClosureExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:2286)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.ClosureExpression.visit(ClosureExpression.java:49)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitMethodCallArguments(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:2596)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitMethodCallExpression(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:3286)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.sc.StaticCompilationVisitor.visitMethodCallExpression(StaticCompilationVisitor.java:397)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.expr.MethodCallExpression.visit(MethodCallExpression.java:70)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitExpressionStatement(CodeVisitorSupport.java:122)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassCodeVisitorSupport.visitExpressionStatement(ClassCodeVisitorSupport.java:197)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.stmt.ExpressionStatement.visit(ExpressionStatement.java:42)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.CodeVisitorSupport.visitBlockStatement(CodeVisitorSupport.java:88)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.ast.ClassCodeVisitorSupport.visitBlockStatement(ClassCodeVisitorSupport.java:106)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.transform.stc.StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.visitBlockStatement(StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:3628)
at
[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8737) STC Method resolution fails if other methods with more parameters exist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16575992#comment-16575992
]
Patric Bechtel commented on GROOVY-8737:
Why search for a longer parameter set if we find one which satisfies the call?
The easiest argument is to use CompileDynamic on B - it'll just work the way I
expected it. It's just STC which doesn't.
> STC Method resolution fails if other methods with more parameters exist
> ---
>
> Key: GROOVY-8737
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8737
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.4.15, 3.0.0-alpha-3, 2.5.1
> Environment: Ubuntu 18.04, Java 8u181
>Reporter: Patric Bechtel
>Priority: Major
>
> Given two classes as follows
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class A {
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args ) { "key=$key,
> args=$args" }
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, Object[] parts ) {
> "key=$key, args=$args, parts=$parts" }
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, String[] names ) {
> "key=$key, args=$args, names=$names" }
> }
> {code}
> and
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> public class B {
> public static void main( String[] args ) {
> println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
> }
> }
> {code}
> will not compile with the error
> {noformat}
> B.groovy: 4: [Static type checking] - Reference to method is ambiguous.
> Cannot choose between [java.lang.String A#msg(java.lang.String,
> java.lang.Object[], java.lang.Object[]), java.lang.String
> A#msg(java.lang.String, java.lang.Object[], java.lang.String[])]
> @ line 4, column 15.
> println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
> {noformat}
> Though there's a perfect match for the called method, it tries to choose one
> of the longer signatures.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8737) STC Method resolution fails if other methods with more parameters exist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16574810#comment-16574810
]
Patric Bechtel commented on GROOVY-8737:
Couldn't we just stop trying vararg variants if we *have* a perfect match
already?
> STC Method resolution fails if other methods with more parameters exist
> ---
>
> Key: GROOVY-8737
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8737
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.4.15, 3.0.0-alpha-3, 2.5.1
> Environment: Ubuntu 18.04, Java 8u181
>Reporter: Patric Bechtel
>Priority: Major
>
> Given two classes as follows
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class A {
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args ) { "key=$key,
> args=$args" }
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, Object[] parts ) {
> "key=$key, args=$args, parts=$parts" }
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, String[] names ) {
> "key=$key, args=$args, names=$names" }
> }
> {code}
> and
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> public class B {
> public static void main( String[] args ) {
> println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
> }
> }
> {code}
> will not compile with the error
> {noformat}
> B.groovy: 4: [Static type checking] - Reference to method is ambiguous.
> Cannot choose between [java.lang.String A#msg(java.lang.String,
> java.lang.Object[], java.lang.Object[]), java.lang.String
> A#msg(java.lang.String, java.lang.Object[], java.lang.String[])]
> @ line 4, column 15.
> println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
> {noformat}
> Though there's a perfect match for the called method, it tries to choose one
> of the longer signatures.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8737) STC Method resolution fails if other methods with more parameters exist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16574740#comment-16574740
]
Patric Bechtel commented on GROOVY-8737:
Yeah, ok ;)
But given the principle of least surprise, this is quite surprising.
I didn't know that anyone was using multiple varargs - wasn't it constrained to
the last parameter?
> STC Method resolution fails if other methods with more parameters exist
> ---
>
> Key: GROOVY-8737
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8737
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.4.15, 3.0.0-alpha-3, 2.5.1
> Environment: Ubuntu 18.04, Java 8u181
>Reporter: Patric Bechtel
>Priority: Major
>
> Given two classes as follows
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class A {
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args ) { "key=$key,
> args=$args" }
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, Object[] parts ) {
> "key=$key, args=$args, parts=$parts" }
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, String[] names ) {
> "key=$key, args=$args, names=$names" }
> }
> {code}
> and
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> public class B {
> public static void main( String[] args ) {
> println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
> }
> }
> {code}
> will not compile with the error
> {noformat}
> B.groovy: 4: [Static type checking] - Reference to method is ambiguous.
> Cannot choose between [java.lang.String A#msg(java.lang.String,
> java.lang.Object[], java.lang.Object[]), java.lang.String
> A#msg(java.lang.String, java.lang.Object[], java.lang.String[])]
> @ line 4, column 15.
> println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
> {noformat}
> Though there's a perfect match for the called method, it tries to choose one
> of the longer signatures.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-8737) STC Method resolution fails if other methods with more parameters exist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16574721#comment-16574721
]
Patric Bechtel edited comment on GROOVY-8737 at 8/9/18 11:45 AM:
-
I always understood that (useful) feature as looking at the very last parameter
and only if there's more parameters in the call than the method has.
This case is reverse IMHO: There's two parameters given, and groovy is trying
to match more to put zero-sized arrays there. Which is weird.
was (Author: patric42):
I always understood that (useful) feature as looking at the very last parameter
and only if there's more parameters in the call than to method has.
This case is reverse IMHO: There's two parameters given, and groovy is trying
to match more to put zero-sized arrays there. Which is weird.
> STC Method resolution fails if other methods with more parameters exist
> ---
>
> Key: GROOVY-8737
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8737
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.4.15, 3.0.0-alpha-3, 2.5.1
> Environment: Ubuntu 18.04, Java 8u181
>Reporter: Patric Bechtel
>Priority: Major
>
> Given two classes as follows
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class A {
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args ) { "key=$key,
> args=$args" }
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, Object[] parts ) {
> "key=$key, args=$args, parts=$parts" }
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, String[] names ) {
> "key=$key, args=$args, names=$names" }
> }
> {code}
> and
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> public class B {
> public static void main( String[] args ) {
> println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
> }
> }
> {code}
> will not compile with the error
> {noformat}
> B.groovy: 4: [Static type checking] - Reference to method is ambiguous.
> Cannot choose between [java.lang.String A#msg(java.lang.String,
> java.lang.Object[], java.lang.Object[]), java.lang.String
> A#msg(java.lang.String, java.lang.Object[], java.lang.String[])]
> @ line 4, column 15.
> println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
> {noformat}
> Though there's a perfect match for the called method, it tries to choose one
> of the longer signatures.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Comment Edited] (GROOVY-8737) STC Method resolution fails if other methods with more parameters exist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16574721#comment-16574721
]
Patric Bechtel edited comment on GROOVY-8737 at 8/9/18 11:45 AM:
-
I always understood that (useful) feature as looking at the very last parameter
and only if there's more parameters in the call than to method has.
This case is reverse IMHO: There's two parameters given, and groovy is trying
to match more to put zero-sized arrays there. Which is weird.
was (Author: patric42):
I always understood that (useful) feature as looking at the very last parameter
and only if there's more parameters to match.
This case is reverse IMHO: There's two parameters given, and groovy is trying
to match more to put zero-sized arrays there. Which is weird.
> STC Method resolution fails if other methods with more parameters exist
> ---
>
> Key: GROOVY-8737
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8737
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.4.15, 3.0.0-alpha-3, 2.5.1
> Environment: Ubuntu 18.04, Java 8u181
>Reporter: Patric Bechtel
>Priority: Major
>
> Given two classes as follows
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class A {
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args ) { "key=$key,
> args=$args" }
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, Object[] parts ) {
> "key=$key, args=$args, parts=$parts" }
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, String[] names ) {
> "key=$key, args=$args, names=$names" }
> }
> {code}
> and
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> public class B {
> public static void main( String[] args ) {
> println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
> }
> }
> {code}
> will not compile with the error
> {noformat}
> B.groovy: 4: [Static type checking] - Reference to method is ambiguous.
> Cannot choose between [java.lang.String A#msg(java.lang.String,
> java.lang.Object[], java.lang.Object[]), java.lang.String
> A#msg(java.lang.String, java.lang.Object[], java.lang.String[])]
> @ line 4, column 15.
> println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
> {noformat}
> Though there's a perfect match for the called method, it tries to choose one
> of the longer signatures.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8737) STC Method resolution fails if other methods with more parameters exist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16574721#comment-16574721
]
Patric Bechtel commented on GROOVY-8737:
I always understood that (useful) feature as looking at the very last parameter
and only if there's more parameters to match.
This case is reverse IMHO: There's two parameters given, and groovy is trying
to match more to put zero-sized arrays there. Which is weird.
> STC Method resolution fails if other methods with more parameters exist
> ---
>
> Key: GROOVY-8737
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8737
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.4.15, 3.0.0-alpha-3, 2.5.1
> Environment: Ubuntu 18.04, Java 8u181
>Reporter: Patric Bechtel
>Priority: Major
>
> Given two classes as follows
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class A {
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args ) { "key=$key,
> args=$args" }
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, Object[] parts ) {
> "key=$key, args=$args, parts=$parts" }
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, String[] names ) {
> "key=$key, args=$args, names=$names" }
> }
> {code}
> and
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> public class B {
> public static void main( String[] args ) {
> println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
> }
> }
> {code}
> will not compile with the error
> {noformat}
> B.groovy: 4: [Static type checking] - Reference to method is ambiguous.
> Cannot choose between [java.lang.String A#msg(java.lang.String,
> java.lang.Object[], java.lang.Object[]), java.lang.String
> A#msg(java.lang.String, java.lang.Object[], java.lang.String[])]
> @ line 4, column 15.
> println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
> {noformat}
> Though there's a perfect match for the called method, it tries to choose one
> of the longer signatures.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-8737) STC Method resolution fails if other methods with more parameters exist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Patric Bechtel updated GROOVY-8737:
---
Description:
Given two classes as follows
{code:java}
@groovy.transform.CompileStatic
class A {
public static String msg( String key, Object[] args ) { "key=$key,
args=$args" }
public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, Object[] parts ) {
"key=$key, args=$args, parts=$parts" }
public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, String[] names ) {
"key=$key, args=$args, names=$names" }
}
{code}
and
{code:java}
@groovy.transform.CompileStatic
public class B {
public static void main( String[] args ) {
println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
}
}
{code}
will not compile with the error
{noformat}
B.groovy: 4: [Static type checking] - Reference to method is ambiguous. Cannot
choose between [java.lang.String A#msg(java.lang.String, java.lang.Object[],
java.lang.Object[]), java.lang.String A#msg(java.lang.String,
java.lang.Object[], java.lang.String[])]
@ line 4, column 15.
println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
{noformat}
Though there's a perfect match for the called method, it tries to choose one of
the longer signatures.
was:
Given two classes as follows
{code:java}
@groovy.transform.CompileStatic
class A {
public static String msg( String key, Object[] args ) { "key=$key,
args=$args" }
public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, Object[] parts ) {
"key=$key, args=$args, parts=$parts" }
public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, String[] names ) {
"key=$key, args=$args, names=$names" }
}
{code}
and
{code:java}
@groovy.transform.CompileStatic
public class B {
public static void main( String[] args ) {
println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
}
}
{code}
will not compile with the error
{noformat}
B.groovy: 4: [Static type checking] - Reference to method is ambiguous. Cannot
choose between [java.lang.String A#msg(java.lang.String, java.lang.Object[],
java.lang.Object[]), java.lang.String A#msg(java.lang.String,
java.lang.Object[], java.lang.String[])]
@ line 4, column 15.
println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
{noformat}
Though there's a perfect match for the called method, it tries to choose one of
the longer signatures.
> STC Method resolution fails if other methods with more parameters exist
> ---
>
> Key: GROOVY-8737
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8737
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.4.15, 3.0.0-alpha-3, 2.5.1
> Environment: Ubuntu 18.04, Java 8u181
>Reporter: Patric Bechtel
>Priority: Major
>
> Given two classes as follows
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class A {
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args ) { "key=$key,
> args=$args" }
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, Object[] parts ) {
> "key=$key, args=$args, parts=$parts" }
> public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, String[] names ) {
> "key=$key, args=$args, names=$names" }
> }
> {code}
> and
> {code:java}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> public class B {
> public static void main( String[] args ) {
> println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
> }
> }
> {code}
> will not compile with the error
> {noformat}
> B.groovy: 4: [Static type checking] - Reference to method is ambiguous.
> Cannot choose between [java.lang.String A#msg(java.lang.String,
> java.lang.Object[], java.lang.Object[]), java.lang.String
> A#msg(java.lang.String, java.lang.Object[], java.lang.String[])]
> @ line 4, column 15.
> println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
> {noformat}
> Though there's a perfect match for the called method, it tries to choose one
> of the longer signatures.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (GROOVY-8737) STC Method resolution fails if other methods with more parameters exist
Patric Bechtel created GROOVY-8737:
--
Summary: STC Method resolution fails if other methods with more
parameters exist
Key: GROOVY-8737
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8737
Project: Groovy
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Static compilation
Affects Versions: 2.5.1, 3.0.0-alpha-3, 2.4.15
Environment: Ubuntu 18.04, Java 8u181
Reporter: Patric Bechtel
Given two classes as follows
{code:java}
@groovy.transform.CompileStatic
class A {
public static String msg( String key, Object[] args ) { "key=$key,
args=$args" }
public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, Object[] parts ) {
"key=$key, args=$args, parts=$parts" }
public static String msg( String key, Object[] args, String[] names ) {
"key=$key, args=$args, names=$names" }
}
{code}
and
{code:java}
@groovy.transform.CompileStatic
public class B {
public static void main( String[] args ) {
println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
}
}
{code}
will not compile with the error
{noformat}
B.groovy: 4: [Static type checking] - Reference to method is ambiguous. Cannot
choose between [java.lang.String A#msg(java.lang.String, java.lang.Object[],
java.lang.Object[]), java.lang.String A#msg(java.lang.String,
java.lang.Object[], java.lang.String[])]
@ line 4, column 15.
println A.msg( 'hello', [ 'world' ] as Object[] )
{noformat}
Though there's a perfect match for the called method, it tries to choose one of
the longer signatures.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8384) Regression in 2.4.13 (snapshot) with STC and intdiv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16258659#comment-16258659
]
Patric Bechtel commented on GROOVY-8384:
Thank you :D
> Regression in 2.4.13 (snapshot) with STC and intdiv
> ---
>
> Key: GROOVY-8384
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8384
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.4.13
> Environment: any
>Reporter: Patric Bechtel
>Assignee: Paul King
> Fix For: 2.4.13
>
>
> Even with the fix of 8380, the following still fails:
> {code}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class GanzBla {
>static void main(String[] args) {
> def a = 5.intdiv(2)
> assert a.class == java.lang.Integer
> def b = new Long( 5.intdiv(2) )
>}
> }
> {code}
> Without CS, this just works, the type of 5.intdiv(2) is an Integer. With STC,
> it's a number suddenly. In 2.4.12, this still works flawlessly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Created] (GROOVY-8384) Regression in 2.4.13 (snapshot) with STC and intdiv
Patric Bechtel created GROOVY-8384:
--
Summary: Regression in 2.4.13 (snapshot) with STC and intdiv
Key: GROOVY-8384
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8384
Project: Groovy
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Static compilation
Affects Versions: 2.4.13
Environment: any
Reporter: Patric Bechtel
Even with the fix of 8380, the following still fails:
{code}
@groovy.transform.CompileStatic
class GanzBla {
static void main(String[] args) {
def a = 5.intdiv(2)
assert a.class == java.lang.Integer
def b = new Long( 5.intdiv(2) )
}
}
{code}
Without CS, this just works, the type of 5.intdiv(2) is an Integer. With STC,
it's a number suddenly. In 2.4.12, this still works flawlessly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8380) Regression in 2.4.13 (snapshot) 62615249161b233b1827d5950671d3a83007cd9f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16252621#comment-16252621
]
Patric Bechtel commented on GROOVY-8380:
How about {code}new Integer( 3 & (-1 ^ 3) ){code}?
> Regression in 2.4.13 (snapshot) 62615249161b233b1827d5950671d3a83007cd9f
>
>
> Key: GROOVY-8380
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8380
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.4.13
> Environment: any
>Reporter: Patric Bechtel
>Priority: Critical
>
> This used to work up to 2.4.12:
> {code}
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class bla {
>static void main(String[] args) {
> println new Long( 5 / 3 )
>}
> }
> {code}
> starting with 2.4.13, it gives this error message:
> {noformat}
> bla.groovy: 4: [Static type checking] - Cannot find matching method
> java.lang.Long#(java.math.BigDecimal). Please check if the declared
> type is right and if the method exists.
> @ line 4, column 15.
> println new Long( 5 / 3 )
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8325) @CompileStatic calls wrong newInstance method.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16251506#comment-16251506
]
Patric Bechtel commented on GROOVY-8325:
Please have a look at GROOVY-8380, as this fix causes a regression for
@groovy.transform.CompileStatic
def bla() {
new Long( 5 / 2 )
}
That used to work and seems on par with the Java behaviour on that matter.
> @CompileStatic calls wrong newInstance method.
> --
>
> Key: GROOVY-8325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8325
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Compiler, Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.4.10
>Reporter: Xiaoguang WANG
>Assignee: Paul King
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.4.13
>
>
> {code:java}
> import groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class Foo {
> static Foo newInstance(Long v) {
> return new Foo()
> }
> }
> @CompileStatic //crash only caused by this CompileStatic
> class TestGroovy {
> static void main(String ... args) {
> def a = Foo.newInstance(123) //when @CompileStatic, this calls
> DefaultGroovyMethods.newInstance
> println a
> }
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (GROOVY-8380) Regression in 2.4.13 (snapshot) 62615249161b233b1827d5950671d3a83007cd9f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16251490#comment-16251490
]
Patric Bechtel commented on GROOVY-8380:
The reason seems to be the fix for GROOVY-8325.
> Regression in 2.4.13 (snapshot) 62615249161b233b1827d5950671d3a83007cd9f
>
>
> Key: GROOVY-8380
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8380
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Static compilation
>Affects Versions: 2.4.13
> Environment: any
>Reporter: Patric Bechtel
>Priority: Critical
>
> This used to work up to 2.4.12:
> @groovy.transform.CompileStatic
> class bla {
>static void main(String[] args) {
> println new Long( 5 / 3 )
>}
> }
> starting with 2.4.13, it gives this error message:
> bla.groovy: 4: [Static type checking] - Cannot find matching method
> java.lang.Long#(java.math.BigDecimal). Please check if the declared
> type is right and if the method exists.
> @ line 4, column 15.
> println new Long( 5 / 3 )
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Created] (GROOVY-8380) Regression in 2.4.13 (snapshot) 62615249161b233b1827d5950671d3a83007cd9f
Patric Bechtel created GROOVY-8380:
--
Summary: Regression in 2.4.13 (snapshot)
62615249161b233b1827d5950671d3a83007cd9f
Key: GROOVY-8380
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8380
Project: Groovy
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Static compilation
Affects Versions: 2.4.13
Environment: any
Reporter: Patric Bechtel
Priority: Critical
This used to work up to 2.4.12:
@groovy.transform.CompileStatic
class bla {
static void main(String[] args) {
println new Long( 5 / 3 )
}
}
starting with 2.4.13, it gives this error message:
bla.groovy: 4: [Static type checking] - Cannot find matching method
java.lang.Long#(java.math.BigDecimal). Please check if the declared type
is right and if the method exists.
@ line 4, column 15.
println new Long( 5 / 3 )
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
