[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-8475) CLONE - I am unable to instantiate objects using the "new" keyword

2018-03-03 Thread John Wagenleitner (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

John Wagenleitner updated GROOVY-8475:
--
Description: 
I am embedding Groovysh in a java application. After some tests, I realized 
that the "new" keyword seems to not work in the last groovysh version. When I 
try to do:
{code}a = new A(){code}
I obtain: "unable to resolve class A"

This is an example:
{code}
groovy:000> class A {
class A {
groovy:001>   public A() {
public A() {
groovy:002> name = "default"
name = "default"
groovy:003> }
}
groovy:004>   String name;
String name;
groovy:005>   }
}
===> true
groovy:000> a = new A()
a = new A()
ERROR org.codehaus.groovy.control.MultipleCompilationErrorsException:
startup failed:
script14159599676571305654112.groovy: 1: unable to resolve class A 
 @ line 1, column 5.
   a = new A()
   ^

1 error
{code}
However, if I use the newInstance method it works:
{code}
groovy:000> a = A.newInstance()
a = A.newInstance()
===> A@2154cecb
{code}
I tested the same code in the previous version (2.3.7) and it works


  was:
I am embedding Groovysh in a java application. After some tests, I realized 
that the "new" keyword seems to not work in the last groovysh version. When I 
try to do:
a = new A()
I obtain: "unable to resolve class A"

This is an example:

groovy:000> class A {
class A {
groovy:001>   public A() {
public A() {
groovy:002> name = "default"
name = "default"
groovy:003> }
}
groovy:004>   String name;
String name;
groovy:005>   }
}
===> true
groovy:000> a = new A()
a = new A()
ERROR org.codehaus.groovy.control.MultipleCompilationErrorsException:
startup failed:
script14159599676571305654112.groovy: 1: unable to resolve class A 
 @ line 1, column 5.
   a = new A()
   ^

1 error

However, if I use the newInstance method it works:
groovy:000> a = A.newInstance()
a = A.newInstance()
===> A@2154cecb

I tested the same code in the previous version (2.3.7) and it works



> CLONE - I am unable to instantiate objects using the "new" keyword
> --
>
> Key: GROOVY-8475
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8475
> Project: Groovy
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Groovysh
>Affects Versions: 2.4.0, 2.4.12, 2.4.13
> Environment: Linux - Debian jessie/sid 64 bits
> Linux - Ubuntu 16 64 bits
>Reporter: Rémy Letient
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2018-02-10-18-36-27-122.png, testA.groovy
>
>
> I am embedding Groovysh in a java application. After some tests, I realized 
> that the "new" keyword seems to not work in the last groovysh version. When I 
> try to do:
> {code}a = new A(){code}
> I obtain: "unable to resolve class A"
> This is an example:
> {code}
> groovy:000> class A {
> class A {
> groovy:001>   public A() {
> public A() {
> groovy:002> name = "default"
> name = "default"
> groovy:003> }
> }
> groovy:004>   String name;
> String name;
> groovy:005>   }
> }
> ===> true
> groovy:000> a = new A()
> a = new A()
> ERROR org.codehaus.groovy.control.MultipleCompilationErrorsException:
> startup failed:
> script14159599676571305654112.groovy: 1: unable to resolve class A 
>  @ line 1, column 5.
>a = new A()
>^
> 1 error
> {code}
> However, if I use the newInstance method it works:
> {code}
> groovy:000> a = A.newInstance()
> a = A.newInstance()
> ===> A@2154cecb
> {code}
> I tested the same code in the previous version (2.3.7) and it works



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-8475) CLONE - I am unable to instantiate objects using the "new" keyword

2018-02-10 Thread JIRA

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rémy Letient updated GROOVY-8475:
-
Environment: 
Linux - Debian jessie/sid 64 bits
Linux - Ubuntu 16 64 bits

  was:Linux - Debian jessie/sid 64 bits


> CLONE - I am unable to instantiate objects using the "new" keyword
> --
>
> Key: GROOVY-8475
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8475
> Project: Groovy
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Groovysh
>Affects Versions: 2.4.0, 2.4.12, 2.4.13
> Environment: Linux - Debian jessie/sid 64 bits
> Linux - Ubuntu 16 64 bits
>Reporter: Rémy Letient
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2018-02-10-18-36-27-122.png, testA.groovy
>
>
> I am embedding Groovysh in a java application. After some tests, I realized 
> that the "new" keyword seems to not work in the last groovysh version. When I 
> try to do:
> a = new A()
> I obtain: "unable to resolve class A"
> This is an example:
> groovy:000> class A {
> class A {
> groovy:001>   public A() {
> public A() {
> groovy:002> name = "default"
> name = "default"
> groovy:003> }
> }
> groovy:004>   String name;
> String name;
> groovy:005>   }
> }
> ===> true
> groovy:000> a = new A()
> a = new A()
> ERROR org.codehaus.groovy.control.MultipleCompilationErrorsException:
> startup failed:
> script14159599676571305654112.groovy: 1: unable to resolve class A 
>  @ line 1, column 5.
>a = new A()
>^
> 1 error
> However, if I use the newInstance method it works:
> groovy:000> a = A.newInstance()
> a = A.newInstance()
> ===> A@2154cecb
> I tested the same code in the previous version (2.3.7) and it works



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-8475) CLONE - I am unable to instantiate objects using the "new" keyword

2018-02-10 Thread JIRA

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rémy Letient updated GROOVY-8475:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.4.0-rc-1)
   2.4.0
   2.4.12
   2.4.13

> CLONE - I am unable to instantiate objects using the "new" keyword
> --
>
> Key: GROOVY-8475
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8475
> Project: Groovy
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Groovysh
>Affects Versions: 2.4.0, 2.4.12, 2.4.13
> Environment: Linux - Debian jessie/sid 64 bits
>Reporter: Rémy Letient
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2018-02-10-18-36-27-122.png, testA.groovy
>
>
> I am embedding Groovysh in a java application. After some tests, I realized 
> that the "new" keyword seems to not work in the last groovysh version. When I 
> try to do:
> a = new A()
> I obtain: "unable to resolve class A"
> This is an example:
> groovy:000> class A {
> class A {
> groovy:001>   public A() {
> public A() {
> groovy:002> name = "default"
> name = "default"
> groovy:003> }
> }
> groovy:004>   String name;
> String name;
> groovy:005>   }
> }
> ===> true
> groovy:000> a = new A()
> a = new A()
> ERROR org.codehaus.groovy.control.MultipleCompilationErrorsException:
> startup failed:
> script14159599676571305654112.groovy: 1: unable to resolve class A 
>  @ line 1, column 5.
>a = new A()
>^
> 1 error
> However, if I use the newInstance method it works:
> groovy:000> a = A.newInstance()
> a = A.newInstance()
> ===> A@2154cecb
> I tested the same code in the previous version (2.3.7) and it works



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-8475) CLONE - I am unable to instantiate objects using the "new" keyword

2018-02-10 Thread JIRA

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rémy Letient updated GROOVY-8475:
-
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.4.0-beta-3)
   2.4.0
   2.4.12
   2.4.13

> CLONE - I am unable to instantiate objects using the "new" keyword
> --
>
> Key: GROOVY-8475
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8475
> Project: Groovy
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Groovysh
>Affects Versions: 2.4.0, 2.4.12, 2.4.13
> Environment: Linux - Debian jessie/sid 64 bits
>Reporter: Rémy Letient
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2018-02-10-18-36-27-122.png, testA.groovy
>
>
> I am embedding Groovysh in a java application. After some tests, I realized 
> that the "new" keyword seems to not work in the last groovysh version. When I 
> try to do:
> a = new A()
> I obtain: "unable to resolve class A"
> This is an example:
> groovy:000> class A {
> class A {
> groovy:001>   public A() {
> public A() {
> groovy:002> name = "default"
> name = "default"
> groovy:003> }
> }
> groovy:004>   String name;
> String name;
> groovy:005>   }
> }
> ===> true
> groovy:000> a = new A()
> a = new A()
> ERROR org.codehaus.groovy.control.MultipleCompilationErrorsException:
> startup failed:
> script14159599676571305654112.groovy: 1: unable to resolve class A 
>  @ line 1, column 5.
>a = new A()
>^
> 1 error
> However, if I use the newInstance method it works:
> groovy:000> a = A.newInstance()
> a = A.newInstance()
> ===> A@2154cecb
> I tested the same code in the previous version (2.3.7) and it works



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-8475) CLONE - I am unable to instantiate objects using the "new" keyword

2018-02-10 Thread JIRA

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rémy Letient updated GROOVY-8475:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.4.13)
   (was: 2.4.12)
   (was: 2.4.0)

> CLONE - I am unable to instantiate objects using the "new" keyword
> --
>
> Key: GROOVY-8475
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8475
> Project: Groovy
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Groovysh
>Affects Versions: 2.4.0, 2.4.12, 2.4.13
> Environment: Linux - Debian jessie/sid 64 bits
>Reporter: Rémy Letient
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2018-02-10-18-36-27-122.png, testA.groovy
>
>
> I am embedding Groovysh in a java application. After some tests, I realized 
> that the "new" keyword seems to not work in the last groovysh version. When I 
> try to do:
> a = new A()
> I obtain: "unable to resolve class A"
> This is an example:
> groovy:000> class A {
> class A {
> groovy:001>   public A() {
> public A() {
> groovy:002> name = "default"
> name = "default"
> groovy:003> }
> }
> groovy:004>   String name;
> String name;
> groovy:005>   }
> }
> ===> true
> groovy:000> a = new A()
> a = new A()
> ERROR org.codehaus.groovy.control.MultipleCompilationErrorsException:
> startup failed:
> script14159599676571305654112.groovy: 1: unable to resolve class A 
>  @ line 1, column 5.
>a = new A()
>^
> 1 error
> However, if I use the newInstance method it works:
> groovy:000> a = A.newInstance()
> a = A.newInstance()
> ===> A@2154cecb
> I tested the same code in the previous version (2.3.7) and it works



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-8475) CLONE - I am unable to instantiate objects using the "new" keyword

2018-02-10 Thread JIRA

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rémy Letient updated GROOVY-8475:
-
Attachment: image-2018-02-10-18-36-27-122.png

> CLONE - I am unable to instantiate objects using the "new" keyword
> --
>
> Key: GROOVY-8475
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8475
> Project: Groovy
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Groovysh
>Affects Versions: 2.4.0-beta-3
> Environment: Linux - Debian jessie/sid 64 bits
>Reporter: Rémy Letient
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.4.0-rc-1
>
> Attachments: image-2018-02-10-18-36-27-122.png, testA.groovy
>
>
> I am embedding Groovysh in a java application. After some tests, I realized 
> that the "new" keyword seems to not work in the last groovysh version. When I 
> try to do:
> a = new A()
> I obtain: "unable to resolve class A"
> This is an example:
> groovy:000> class A {
> class A {
> groovy:001>   public A() {
> public A() {
> groovy:002> name = "default"
> name = "default"
> groovy:003> }
> }
> groovy:004>   String name;
> String name;
> groovy:005>   }
> }
> ===> true
> groovy:000> a = new A()
> a = new A()
> ERROR org.codehaus.groovy.control.MultipleCompilationErrorsException:
> startup failed:
> script14159599676571305654112.groovy: 1: unable to resolve class A 
>  @ line 1, column 5.
>a = new A()
>^
> 1 error
> However, if I use the newInstance method it works:
> groovy:000> a = A.newInstance()
> a = A.newInstance()
> ===> A@2154cecb
> I tested the same code in the previous version (2.3.7) and it works



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)