[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-114) Support OpenStack Keystone v3 API
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16072604#comment-16072604 ] Everett Toews commented on JCLOUDS-114: --- Apologies but I won't be able to help out here. > Support OpenStack Keystone v3 API > - > > Key: JCLOUDS-114 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-114 > Project: jclouds > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: jclouds-blobstore, jclouds-compute, > jclouds-labs-openstack >Affects Versions: 1.7.0 >Reporter: Jeremy Daggett >Priority: Critical > Labels: oak, openstack-keystone > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] OS Ceilometer API support (#166)
Closed #166. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/166#event-272752086
Re: [jclouds-site] add softlayer getting started (#134)
@andreaturli The next release is out. ;) I'll leave this one up to you. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/134#issuecomment-89337328
Re: [jclouds-examples] Add layer 7 load balancer examples. (#61)
Closed #61. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/61#event-272780705
Re: [jclouds-site] Update compute.md (#130)
Closed #130. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/130#event-272779175
Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Adds service predicates and more tests (#186)
:+1: after a check for naming consistency is done. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/186#issuecomment-89410171
Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Adds service predicates and more tests (#186)
+import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
+import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS;
+import static org.jclouds.util.Predicates2.retry;
+
+import org.jclouds.openstack.poppy.v1.domain.Service;
+import org.jclouds.openstack.poppy.v1.domain.ServiceStatus;
+import org.jclouds.openstack.poppy.v1.features.ServiceApi;
+import com.google.common.base.Predicate;
+
+public class ServicePredicates {
+ public static PredicateService awaitDeployed(ServiceApi serviceApi) {
+ StatusUpdatedPredicate statusPredicate = new
StatusUpdatedPredicate(serviceApi, ServiceStatus.DEPLOYED);
+ return retry(statusPredicate, 1200, 15, 15, SECONDS);
+ }
+
+ private static class StatusUpdatedPredicate implements PredicateService
{
Oops. I see that now. I think it was the name of the class that threw me. To me
`StatusUpdatedPredicate` says it has to do with a 'Updated' status. Search the
other predicates packages and see if this name is consistent with others. It
should be inline with whatever is most consistent.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/186/files#r27753065
Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-599 ability to execute function locally before initScript runs. (#406)
Closed #406. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/406#event-272756458
Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Adds service predicates and more tests (#186)
+import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
+import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS;
+import static org.jclouds.util.Predicates2.retry;
+
+import org.jclouds.openstack.poppy.v1.domain.Service;
+import org.jclouds.openstack.poppy.v1.domain.ServiceStatus;
+import org.jclouds.openstack.poppy.v1.features.ServiceApi;
+import com.google.common.base.Predicate;
+
+public class ServicePredicates {
+ public static PredicateService awaitDeployed(ServiceApi serviceApi) {
+ StatusUpdatedPredicate statusPredicate = new
StatusUpdatedPredicate(serviceApi, ServiceStatus.DEPLOYED);
+ return retry(statusPredicate, 1200, 15, 15, SECONDS);
+ }
+
+ private static class StatusUpdatedPredicate implements PredicateService
{
This should really be a more generalized status predicate like
[ServerStatusPredicate](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/apis/openstack-nova/src/main/java/org/jclouds/openstack/nova/v2_0/predicates/ServerPredicates.java#L92).
The convenience method `awaitDeployed` can then be built on that.
I know it's unlikely that anyone would ever want to await on any of the other
`ServiceStatus` in this particular case but the general style should still be
followed.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/186/files#r27735322
Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-670 Option force no password when launching images on providers (#486)
Closed #486. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/486#event-272758128
Re: [jclouds] Throw sane error if one of security groups is null (#515)
Closed #515. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/515#event-272760104
Re: [jclouds] Updated the requests in unit test case to include globalIdentifier (#531)
Closed #531. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/531#event-272761027
Re: [jclouds] Expecting 2 of 3 or the first flaky test to succeed (#577)
Closed #577. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/577#event-272761787
Re: [jclouds-site] Update aws.md (#129)
Closed #129. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/129#event-272762945
Re: [jclouds-site] Updated for 1.9.0 (#155)
Merged and published. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/155#issuecomment-87833345
[jclouds-site] Updated for 1.9.0 (#155)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/155 -- Commit Summary -- * Updated for 1.9.0 -- File Changes -- M guides/openstack.md (20) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/155.patch https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/155.diff --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/155
Re: [jclouds-labs] BlobStore API for Orion based back-ends (#45)
I don't know the history of this PR but the fact that it's been open since Nov. 30, 2013 is odd. @aledsage @demobox @andrewgaul Does it make sense to continue working on this? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/45#issuecomment-86485058
Re: [jclouds-labs] BlobStore API for Orion based back-ends (#45)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/45#issuecomment-85718559
Re: [jclouds] Support for OpenStack OS-Services API (#573)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/573#issuecomment-85716682
Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-670 Option force no password when launching images on providers (#486)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/486#issuecomment-85715089
Re: [jclouds] Add support for Azure Copy Blob (#514)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/514#issuecomment-85715395
Re: [jclouds] Introduce BlobstoreCli (#487)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/487#issuecomment-85715196
Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-642: InternalUrl fallback (#462)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/462#issuecomment-85714738
Re: [jclouds] Token based authentication in openstack-keystone (#433)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/433#issuecomment-85714569
Re: [jclouds-examples] Add an example to create/delete/list Google Cloud Storage buckets. (#64)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/64#issuecomment-85717886
Re: [jclouds-examples] GCS-Example initial commit (#66)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/66#issuecomment-85717959
Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] OS Ceilometer API support (#166)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/166#issuecomment-85718143
Re: [jclouds-examples] Simplify interface of Google examples and fix the name and comment of userName variable (#63)
@demobox Can this be closed? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/63#issuecomment-85717848
Re: [jclouds-site] Update compute.md (#131)
Merged. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/131#issuecomment-85720599
Re: [jclouds] Add copyBlob to portable abstraction and add S3-optimized variant (#511)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/511#issuecomment-85715297
Re: [jclouds] Updated the requests in unit test case to include globalIdentifier (#531)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/531#issuecomment-85715651
Re: [jclouds] Throw sane error if one of security groups is null (#515)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/515#issuecomment-85715464
Re: [jclouds-site] Update compute.md (#130)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/130#issuecomment-85719600
Re: [jclouds-site] Update aws.md (#129)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/129#issuecomment-85719557
Re: [jclouds-site] add softlayer getting started (#134)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/134#issuecomment-85720981
Re: [jclouds] Expecting 2 of 3 or the first flaky test to succeed (#577)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/577#issuecomment-85717259
Re: [jclouds] Import rackspace-cloudfiles from labs (#565)
Superseded by #705 --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/565#issuecomment-85716224
Re: [jclouds-examples] Add layer 7 load balancer examples. (#61)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/61#issuecomment-85717726
Re: [jclouds-karaf] JCLOUDS-85: Improving the creation of instance of PropertyShellTableFact... (#18)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/18#issuecomment-85718822
Re: [jclouds] JCLOUDS-599 ability to execute function locally before initScript runs. (#406)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/406#issuecomment-85714023
Re: [jclouds-labs] JCLOUDS-664: Implemented Role represenstaion in API (#118)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/118#issuecomment-85718608
Re: [jclouds-labs-aws] JCLOUDS-750: Refactor glacier domain classes using @AutoValue (#64)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-aws/pull/64#issuecomment-85718421
Re: [jclouds-labs-aws] Prefer TestUtils.randomByteSource (#42)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-aws/pull/42#issuecomment-85718345
Re: [jclouds-karaf] JCLOUDS-716: Remove Rackspace First-Gen Cloud Servers (#63)
If no one who knows Karaf cares to merge this, I'll just go ahead and close it on April 3. I'd rather close it unmerged than risk breaking Karaf in some weird way I'm not prepared to deal with. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/63#issuecomment-85719435
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Separates parent and top level pom. (#22)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/22#issuecomment-85718867
Re: [jclouds-karaf] JCLOUDS-635 Always check for container existence before uploading blobs. (#50)
Thanks for the pull request but it's release week in jclouds and that means it's time to clean up the PR queue. This PR will be over 6 months old as of April 1. If you intend to continue work on it, please make a comment by April 2. Otherwise it will be closed on April 3. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/50#issuecomment-85718919
Re: [jclouds] Fixed VolumeAttachment in HPCloud Compute (#711)
:+1: Success on OpenStack Juno (with DevStack) mvn clean test -Plive -Dtest.openstack-nova.endpoint=http://$DEVSTACK_HOST:5000/v2.0/ -Dtest.openstack-nova.identity=demo:demo -Dtest.openstack-nova.credential=devstack -Dtest.openstack-nova.image-id=$IMAGE_ID -Dtest.openstack-nova.flavor-id=2 -Dtest=VolumeAttachmentApiLiveTest Success on Rackspace mvn clean test -Plive -Dtest.rackspace-cloudservers-us.identity=$RACKSPACE_USERNAME -Dtest.rackspace-cloudservers-us.credential=$RACKSPACE_API_KEY -Dtest.rackspace-cloudservers-us.image-id=$IMAGE_ID -Dtest.rackspace-cloudservers-us.flavor-id=performance1-1 -Dtest.rackspace-cloudservers-us.region=IAD -Dtest.rackspace-cloudservers-us.volume-size-gb=100 -Dtest=CloudServersUSVolumeAttachmentExtensionLiveTest --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/711#issuecomment-85235985
[jclouds] Modernize the VolumeAttachmentApiLiveTest (#709)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/709 -- Commit Summary -- * Modernize the VolumeAttachmentApiLiveTest -- File Changes -- M apis/openstack-nova/pom.xml (6) M apis/openstack-nova/src/test/java/org/jclouds/openstack/nova/v2_0/extensions/VolumeAttachmentApiLiveTest.java (254) M apis/openstack-nova/src/test/java/org/jclouds/openstack/nova/v2_0/features/ServerApiLiveTest.java (4) M apis/openstack-nova/src/test/java/org/jclouds/openstack/nova/v2_0/internal/BaseNovaApiLiveTest.java (40) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/709.patch https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/709.diff --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/709
Re: [jclouds] Modernize the VolumeAttachmentApiLiveTest (#709)
Hopefully this is in reasonably good shape now. I'll be on vacation until Monday and won't have my laptop with me. If changes need to be made, go ahead and push on top of my commits or just cherry pick or whatever. I just don't want to hold the release up. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/709#issuecomment-83757647
Re: [jclouds] Deprecate Nova API for volumes in favour of Cinder API for volumes (#708)
@nacx Shall we pull this into 1.9.0? It's related to the bug that broke the rc and it's just a doc change so it's zero risk. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/708#issuecomment-83757390
Re: [jclouds-examples] Updated Rackspace examples to 1.9.0 (#71)
There are a couple of problems with this. When I compile I get the warning. $ javac -classpath jclouds-1.9.0-rc1/lib/*:src/main/java/:src/main/resources/ src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/*.java jclouds-1.9.0-rc1/lib/jclouds-slf4j-1.9.0.jar(org/jclouds/logging/slf4j/config/SLF4JLoggingModule.class): warning: Cannot find annotation method 'value()' in type 'AutoService': class file for com.google.auto.service.AutoService not found 1 warning When the Cloud Block Storage smoke tests are run in `SmokeTest` I get the error. Exception in thread main java.lang.IllegalStateException: Optional.get() cannot be called on an absent value at com.google.common.base.Absent.get(Absent.java:47) at org.jclouds.examples.rackspace.cloudblockstorage.CreateVolumeAndAttach.init(CreateVolumeAndAttach.java:116) at org.jclouds.examples.rackspace.cloudblockstorage.CreateVolumeAndAttach.main(CreateVolumeAndAttach.java:81) at org.jclouds.examples.rackspace.SmokeTest.smokeTest(SmokeTest.java:72) at org.jclouds.examples.rackspace.SmokeTest.main(SmokeTest.java:48) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/71#issuecomment-83010122
[jclouds-examples] Updated Rackspace examples to 1.9.0 (#71)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/71 -- Commit Summary -- * Updated Rackspace examples to 1.9.0 -- File Changes -- M rackspace/pom.xml (4) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/Authentication.java (8) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/DeleteAll.java (50) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/Logging.java (10) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/SmokeTest.java (6) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/autoscale/AutoscaleCleanup.java (8) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/autoscale/Constants.java (2) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/autoscale/CreatePolicy.java (6) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/autoscale/CreateWebhook.java (12) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/autoscale/ExecuteWebhook.java (11) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/autoscale/UpdatePolicy.java (9) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudblockstorage/Constants.java (2) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudblockstorage/CreateSnapshot.java (6) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudblockstorage/CreateVolumeAndAttach.java (18) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudblockstorage/DeleteSnapshot.java (4) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudblockstorage/DeleteVolume.java (4) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudblockstorage/DetachVolume.java (19) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudblockstorage/ListSnapshots.java (12) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudblockstorage/ListVolumeAttachments.java (8) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudblockstorage/ListVolumeTypes.java (12) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudblockstorage/ListVolumes.java (12) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddatabases/Constants.java (2) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddatabases/CreateDatabase.java (6) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddatabases/CreateInstance.java (6) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddatabases/CreateUser.java (6) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddatabases/DeleteDatabase.java (6) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddatabases/DeleteInstance.java (4) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddatabases/DeleteUser.java (6) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddatabases/GrantRootAccess.java (4) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddatabases/TestDatabase.java (6) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddns/CRUDReverseDNSRecords.java (6) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddns/CreateDomains.java (2) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddns/CreateRecords.java (4) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddns/DeleteDomains.java (2) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddns/DeleteRecords.java (6) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddns/ListDomains.java (2) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddns/ListRecords.java (8) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddns/UpdateDomains.java (2) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/clouddns/UpdateRecords.java (14) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudloadbalancers/AddNodes.java (8) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudloadbalancers/Constants.java (2) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudloadbalancers/CreateLoadBalancerWithExistingServers.java (6) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudloadbalancers/CreateLoadBalancerWithNewServers.java (4) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudloadbalancers/DeleteLoadBalancers.java (4) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudloadbalancers/ListLoadBalancers.java (8) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudloadbalancers/RemoveNodes.java (8) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudloadbalancers/UpdateLoadBalancers.java (4) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudloadbalancers/UpdateNodes.java (8) M
[jclouds] Deprecate Nova API for volumes in favour of Cinder API for volumes (#708)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/708 -- Commit Summary -- * Deprecate Nova API for volumes in favour of Cinder API for volumes -- File Changes -- M apis/openstack-nova/src/main/java/org/jclouds/openstack/nova/v2_0/extensions/VolumeApi.java (32) M apis/openstack-nova/src/main/java/org/jclouds/openstack/nova/v2_0/extensions/VolumeAttachmentApi.java (15) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/708.patch https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/708.diff --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/708
Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Poppy service api (#179)
:+1: --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/179#issuecomment-78336509
Re: [jclouds] adding attache detach interface to nova api (#697)
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more + * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 + * (the License); you may not use this file except in compliance with + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ +package org.jclouds.openstack.nova.v2_0.features; This should be in `package org.jclouds.openstack.nova.v2_0.extensions` instead. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/697/files#r26171299
Re: [jclouds] adding attache detach interface to nova api (#697)
+
+import javax.inject.Named;
+import javax.ws.rs.Consumes;
+import javax.ws.rs.DELETE;
+import javax.ws.rs.POST;
+import javax.ws.rs.Path;
+import javax.ws.rs.PathParam;
+import javax.ws.rs.core.MediaType;
+
+/**
+ * interface api for nova
+ */
+@RequestFilters(AuthenticateRequest.class)
+@Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
+@Path(/servers)
+public interface InterfaceApi {
This also need to implement the _List interfaces_ and _Show attached interface
information_ methods from
[os-interface](http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-compute-v2-ext.html#ext-os-interface).
If you have those methods you shouldn't have to depend on particular UUIDs in
the tests.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/697/files#r26171229
Re: [jclouds] adding attache detach interface to nova api (#697)
@@ -457,4 +457,12 @@ ImageApi getImageApiForZone( @Delegate Optional? extends ConsolesApi getConsolesExtensionForZone( @EndpointParam(parser = RegionToEndpoint.class) String zone); + +/** + * Provides access to interface Type features. + */ +@Delegate +Optional? extends InterfaceApi getInterfaceApiForZone( +@EndpointParam(parser = RegionToEndpoint.class) String zone); Should be `OptionalInterfaceApi getInterfaceApi(@EndpointParam(parser = RegionToEndpoint.class) String region);` --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/697/files#r26171650
Re: [jclouds] adding attache detach interface to nova api (#697)
+@RequestFilters(AuthenticateRequest.class)
+@Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
+@Path(/servers)
+public interface InterfaceApi {
+
+ @Named(interface:attach)
+ @POST
+ @SelectJson(interfaceAttachment)
+ @Path(/{server_id}/os-interface)
+ InterfaceAttachment attachInterface(@PathParam(server_id) String
serverId);
+
+ @Named(interface:attach)
+ @POST
+ @SelectJson(interfaceAttachment)
+ @Path(/{server_id}/os-interface)
+ InterfaceAttachment attachInterface(@PathParam(server_id) String
serverId, AttachInterfaceOptions options);
Needs some Javadoc. You can just copy the info out of
[os-interface](http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-compute-v2-ext.html#ext-os-interface).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/697/files#r26172099
Re: [jclouds] adding attache detach interface to nova api (#697)
+public Setorg.jclouds.openstack.nova.v2_0.domain.FixedIp getFixedIps()
{
+return fixedIps;
+}
+
+public String getPortId() {
+return portId;
+}
+
+public String getNetId() {
+return netId;
+}
+
+public static class Builder {
+
+/**
+ * @see AttachInterfaceOptions#getPortState()()
Double `()()` here
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/697/files#r26171721
Re: [jclouds] adding attache detach interface to nova api (#697)
+import javax.ws.rs.PathParam;
+import javax.ws.rs.core.MediaType;
+
+/**
+ * interface api for nova
+ */
+@RequestFilters(AuthenticateRequest.class)
+@Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
+@Path(/servers)
+public interface InterfaceApi {
+
+ @Named(interface:attach)
+ @POST
+ @SelectJson(interfaceAttachment)
+ @Path(/{server_id}/os-interface)
+ InterfaceAttachment attachInterface(@PathParam(server_id) String
serverId);
Needs some Javadoc. You can just copy the info out of
[os-interface](http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-compute-v2-ext.html#ext-os-interface).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/697/files#r26172087
Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Poppy service api (#179)
+ @Named(service:list) + @GET + @ResponseParser(ParseServices.class) + @Transform(ServicesToPagedIterable.class) + @Fallback(Fallbacks.EmptyPagedIterableOnNotFoundOr404.class) + PagedIterableService list(); + + /** +* Lists services by providing a specific set of listing options. +* @param options Describes how services should be listed. +*/ + @Named(service:list) + @GET + @ResponseParser(ParseServices.class) + @Fallback(EmptyServicesFallback.class) + Services list(PaginationOptions options); Should this return a Services object? Is this inline with the [Pagination section of API/Provider Writing Practices](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=49578594#API/ProviderWritingPractices-Pagination)? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/179/files#r26029537
Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Poppy service api (#179)
+ @Override
+ public R extends HttpRequest R bindToRequest(R request, MapString,
Object postParams) {
+ String jsonPatch = null;
+ Service service = (Service) postParams.get(service);
+
+ Json json = Guice.createInjector(new
GsonModule()).getInstance(Json.class);
+
+ String targetService = json.toJson(postParams.get(updateService));
+ String sourceService =
json.toJson(service.toUpdatableService().build());
+
+ ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
+ try {
+ jsonPatch = JsonDiff.asJson(mapper.readTree(sourceService),
mapper.readTree(targetService)).toString();
+ } catch (IOException e) {
+ e.printStackTrace();
+ throw new RuntimeException(Could not create a JSONPatch);
Don't mask the original exception. Use `RuntimeException(String message,
Throwable cause)` instead.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/179/files#r26029069
Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Poppy service api (#179)
+
+ @Override
+ public R extends HttpRequest R bindToRequest(R request, MapString,
Object postParams) {
+ String jsonPatch = null;
+ Service service = (Service) postParams.get(service);
+
+ Json json = Guice.createInjector(new
GsonModule()).getInstance(Json.class);
+
+ String targetService = json.toJson(postParams.get(updateService));
+ String sourceService =
json.toJson(service.toUpdatableService().build());
+
+ ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
+ try {
+ jsonPatch = JsonDiff.asJson(mapper.readTree(sourceService),
mapper.readTree(targetService)).toString();
+ } catch (IOException e) {
+ e.printStackTrace();
I think this should just be removed completely.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/179/files#r26029099
Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Poppy service api (#179)
+* @param id the id of the service to delete
+* @return true if delete was successful, false if not
+*/
+ @Named(network:delete)
+ @DELETE
+ @Path(/{id})
+ @Fallback(Fallbacks.FalseOnNotFoundOr404.class)
+ boolean delete(@PathParam(id) String id);
+
+ /**
+* Updates a service by applying JSONPatch internally.
+* https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6902
+* This requires providing your updateable JSON and the target JSON.
+*
+* @param service Source JSON
+* @param createService Target JSON
Should be `updateService`
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/179/files#r26029920
Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Poppy service api (#179)
+ @Fallback(NullOnNotFoundOr404.class) + @Nullable + Service get(@PathParam(id) String id); + + /** +* Creates a service. +* +* @param options the options to create the service with +* @return a URI to the created service +*/ + @Named(service:create) + @POST + @ResponseParser(ParseServiceURIFromHeaders.class) + @Fallback(NullOnNotFoundOr404.class) + @Nullable + URI create(CreateService options); `options` is an odd name for this param. In `update()` it's called `updateService`. I suggest `createService `. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/179/files#r26030007
[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-819) Allow prepending a custom user agent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14317160#comment-14317160
]
Everett Toews commented on JCLOUDS-819:
---
Me too. As long as it gets well documented.
Allow prepending a custom user agent
Key: JCLOUDS-819
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-819
Project: jclouds
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: jclouds-core
Reporter: Everett Toews
Priority: Minor
Give your users the ability to _prepend_ a custom user agent. So if the
existing user agent is jclouds/1.8.1 java/1.7.0_51
Provide a method for your users to easily prepend their own user agent so
they can further customize it. e.g. users-app/0.1.2 jclouds/1.8.1
java/1.7.0_51
This will give cloud providers much better insight into how people are using
jclouds. This should be well documented and part of examples that are written
for jclouds.
It could be set like,
{code}
ComputeServiceContext context = ContextBuilder.newBuilder(PROVIDER)
.credentials(username, apiKey)
.userAgent(users-app/0.1.2)
.buildView(ComputeServiceContext.class);
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-819) Allow prepending a custom user agent
Everett Toews created JCLOUDS-819:
-
Summary: Allow prepending a custom user agent
Key: JCLOUDS-819
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-819
Project: jclouds
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: jclouds-core
Reporter: Everett Toews
Priority: Minor
Give your users the ability to _prepend_ a custom user agent. So if the
existing user agent is jclouds/1.8.1 java/1.7.0_51
Provide a method for your users to easily prepend their own user agent so they
can further customize it. e.g. users-app/0.1.2 jclouds/1.8.1 java/1.7.0_51
This will give cloud providers much better insight into how people are using
jclouds. This should be well documented and part of examples that are written
for jclouds.
It could be set like,
{code}
ComputeServiceContext context = ContextBuilder.newBuilder(PROVIDER)
.credentials(username, apiKey)
.userAgent(users-app/0.1.2)
.buildView(ComputeServiceContext.class);
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
Re: [jclouds-site] Encourage users to join the jclouds community (#152)
Reopened #152. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/152#event-224733887
Re: [jclouds-site] Encourage users to join the jclouds community (#152)
Closed #152. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/152#event-224737596
Re: [jclouds-site] Encourage users to join the jclouds community (#152)
Reopened #152. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/152#event-224737646
[jclouds-site] Encourage users to join the jclouds community (#152)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/152 -- Commit Summary -- * Encourage users to join the jclouds community -- File Changes -- M guides/rackspace.md (2) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/152.patch https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/152.diff --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/152
Re: [jclouds-site] Encourage users to join the jclouds community (#152)
Closed #152. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/152#event-224733857
Re: [jclouds-site] Encourage users to join the jclouds community (#152)
Closed #152. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/152#event-224789716
Re: [jclouds-site] Encourage users to join the jclouds community (#152)
Merged and published. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/152#issuecomment-71502957
[jira] [Closed] (JCLOUDS-655) com.google.gson.JsonSyntaxException on trying to start a new instance with openstack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Everett Toews closed JCLOUDS-655.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.9.0
1.8.2
com.google.gson.JsonSyntaxException on trying to start a new instance with
openstack
Key: JCLOUDS-655
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-655
Project: jclouds
Issue Type: Bug
Components: jclouds-compute
Affects Versions: 1.8.0
Environment: Openstack Havana, linux
Reporter: Andrew Ruef
Assignee: Taylor Jones
Fix For: 1.8.2, 1.9.0
this seems very similar to [JCLOUDS-558]:
{code}
{images: [{status: ACTIVE, updated: 2014-08-08T04:43:36Z, links:
[{href:
http://192.168.24.16:8774/v2/d312a9d1acee46499e04fc2c0cd7e540/images/cd9d57a9-0978-45f3-9cbc-edb99347be6b;,
rel: self}, {href:
http://192.168.24.16:8774/d312a9d1acee46499e04fc2c0cd7e540/images/cd9d57a9-0978-45f3-9cbc-edb99347be6b;,
rel: bookmark}, {href:
http://192.168.24.16:9292/d312a9d1acee46499e04fc2c0cd7e540/images/cd9d57a9-0978-45f3-9cbc-edb99347be6b;,
type: application/vnd.openstack.image, rel: alternate}], id:
cd9d57a9-0978-45f3-9cbc-edb99347be6b, OS-EXT-IMG-SIZE:size: 0, name:
t11, created: 2014-08-08T04:43:36Z, minDisk: 0, progress: 100,
minRam: 0, metadata: {block_device_mapping: [{guest_format: null,
boot_index: 0, no_device: null, volume_id: null, volume_size: null,
disk_bus: null, image_id: null, source_type: snapshot, device_type:
null, snapshot_id: a900a56c-61b7-4438-9150-76312fa1aa10,
destination_type: volume, delete_on_termination: null}], checksum:
32c08d302f9206668030d47789b77858, min_ram: 1, disk_format: qcow2,
image_name: Ubuntu LTS 14.04, bdm_v2: True, image_id:
cfefefc1-eba2-4b1e-9b07-a8c74a872d65, root_device_name: /dev/vda,
container_format: bare, min_disk: 8, size: 254149120}},
{status: ACTIVE, updated: 2014-06-25T13:46:44Z, links: [{href:
http://192.168.24.16:8774/v2/d312a9d1acee46499e04fc2c0cd7e540/images/224f4c31-052f-4e87-9f36-52c148358f60;,
rel: self}, {href:
http://192.168.24.16:8774/d312a9d1acee46499e04fc2c0cd7e540/images/224f4c31-052f-4e87-9f36-52c148358f60;,
rel: bookmark}, {href:
http://192.168.24.16:9292/d312a9d1acee46499e04fc2c0cd7e540/images/224f4c31-052f-4e87-9f36-52c148358f60;,
type: application/vnd.openstack.image, rel: alternate}], id:
224f4c31-052f-4e87-9f36-52c148358f60, OS-EXT-IMG-SIZE:size: 344457216,
name: CentOS 6.5, created: 2014-06-25T13:45:19Z, minDisk: 8,
progress: 100, minRam: 1, metadata: {}}, {status: ACTIVE,
updated: 2014-06-25T13:41:29Z, links: [{href:
http://192.168.24.16:8774/v2/d312a9d1acee46499e04fc2c0cd7e540/images/7c35e28f-fee6-4f0a-a479-67ce8aa1e986;,
rel: self}, {href:
http://192.168.24.16:8774/d312a9d1acee46499e04fc2c0cd7e540/images/7c35e28f-fee6-4f0a-a479-67ce8aa1e986;,
rel: bookmark}, {href:
http://192.168.24.16:9292/d312a9d1acee46499e04fc2c0cd7e540/images/7c35e28f-fee6-4f0a-a479-67ce8aa1e986;,
type: application/vnd.openstack.image, rel: alternate}], id:
7c35e28f-fee6-4f0a-a479-67ce8aa1e986, OS-EXT-IMG-SIZE:size: 13167616,
name: Cirros 0.3.2, created: 2014-06-25T13:41:25Z, minDisk: 1,
progress: 100, minRam: 1, metadata: {}}, {status: ACTIVE,
updated: 2014-06-25T13:38:57Z, links: [{href:
http://192.168.24.16:8774/v2/d312a9d1acee46499e04fc2c0cd7e540/images/cfefefc1-eba2-4b1e-9b07-a8c74a872d65;,
rel: self}, {href:
http://192.168.24.16:8774/d312a9d1acee46499e04fc2c0cd7e540/images/cfefefc1-eba2-4b1e-9b07-a8c74a872d65;,
rel: bookmark}, {href:
http://192.168.24.16:9292/d312a9d1acee46499e04fc2c0cd7e540/images/cfefefc1-eba2-4b1e-9b07-a8c74a872d65;,
type: application/vnd.openstack.image, rel: alternate}], id:
cfefefc1-eba2-4b1e-9b07-a8c74a872d65, OS-EXT-IMG-SIZE:size: 254149120,
name: Ubuntu LTS 14.04, created: 2014-06-25T13:38:28Z, minDisk: 8,
progress: 100, minRam: 1, metadata: {}}]}
- Error parsing input
com.google.gson.JsonSyntaxException: java.lang.IllegalStateException:
Expected a string but was BEGIN_ARRAY at line 1 column 733
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
Re: [jclouds] Fix for JCLOUDS-655 (#626)
Merged to [1.8.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/f708d203) and [master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds/commit/73600c81) Nice work @monitorjbl! This was a tough one but you stuck with it. Can we give you a shout out on Twitter? If so, what's your Twitter handle? Thanks for all the help @nacx --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/626#issuecomment-71532424
Re: [jclouds] Fix for JCLOUDS-655 (#626)
Closed #626. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/626#event-224901404
[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-810) Example of jclouds in a JEE container
Everett Toews created JCLOUDS-810: - Summary: Example of jclouds in a JEE container Key: JCLOUDS-810 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-810 Project: jclouds Issue Type: Bug Components: jclouds-examples Reporter: Everett Toews A very simple hello world style example of configuring a JEE container (e.g. Glassfish or JBoss) and using the BlobStore within that container would be useful. The example would best belong in https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples and/or http://jclouds.apache.org/guides/ -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Assigned] (JCLOUDS-219) Change disk config attribute in Nova to use an Enum
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Everett Toews reassigned JCLOUDS-219: - Assignee: (was: Everett Toews) Change disk config attribute in Nova to use an Enum --- Key: JCLOUDS-219 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-219 Project: jclouds Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Everett Toews Labels: openstack -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Assigned] (JCLOUDS-454) NovaComputeService should query extensions to see if security groups are supported
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Everett Toews reassigned JCLOUDS-454: - Assignee: (was: Everett Toews) NovaComputeService should query extensions to see if security groups are supported -- Key: JCLOUDS-454 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-454 Project: jclouds Issue Type: Bug Components: jclouds-compute Reporter: Everett Toews Priority: Minor Labels: openstack Fix For: 2.0.0 Right now NovaSecurityGroupExtension is injected into the NovaComputeService via NovaComputeServiceContextModule. This is effectively an assumption that all OpenStack clouds support security groups. Some may not. NovaComputeService should override getSecurityGroupExtension() and query extensions to see if security groups are supported. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
Re: [jclouds] Fix for JCLOUDS-655 (#626)
[Checkstyle violation](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1527/org.apache.jclouds.api$openstack-nova/violations/file/src/test/java/org/jclouds/openstack/nova/v2_0/config/ImageAdapterTest.java/) Unused import in `ImageAdapterTest.java` --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/626#issuecomment-71259153
Re: [jclouds-examples] Update examples to 1.8.1 (#68)
Merged --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/68#issuecomment-70881777
Re: [jclouds-examples] Delete all resources in all regions of an account (#70)
Merged. `rackspace-cloudnetworks-us` wasn't part of the 1.8.1 release so it will have to wait. I don't want this to be interactive so I'll pass on the captcha for now. I think naming it DeleteAll makes it pretty explicit what it does. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/70#issuecomment-70882566
Re: [jclouds-examples] Delete all resources in all regions of an account (#70)
Closed #70. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/70#event-222473088
[jira] [Closed] (JCLOUDS-807) org.jclouds.openstack.nova.v2_0.features.ImageApi.listInDetail may fail for some Images with structured metadata
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Everett Toews closed JCLOUDS-807.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
We're getting close to a fix!
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/626
org.jclouds.openstack.nova.v2_0.features.ImageApi.listInDetail may fail for
some Images with structured metadata
Key: JCLOUDS-807
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-807
Project: jclouds
Issue Type: Bug
Components: jclouds-labs-openstack
Affects Versions: 1.8.0, 2.0.0
Reporter: Pierre Souchay
In our environment (Openstack Icehouse), the list of images with details may
return some structured data in metadata, for instance :
{code}
metadata: {
block_device_mapping: [
{
guest_format: null,
boot_index: 0,
no_device: null,
volume_id: null,
volume_size: null,
disk_bus: virtio,
image_id: null,
source_type: snapshot,
device_type: disk,
snapshot_id: ce746121-7829-4818-bf5b-2b86d48b5ce0,
destination_type: volume,
delete_on_termination: null
},
{
guest_format: null,
boot_index: null,
no_device: null,
volume_id: null,
volume_size: null,
disk_bus: null,
image_id: null,
source_type: snapshot,
device_type: null,
snapshot_id: a659cb24-c84e-472b-8ec2-9e4af8211d08,
destination_type: volume,
delete_on_termination: null
}
],
container_format: bare
[...]
}
{code}
In that case, the deserialization code fails with the following message
com.google.gson.JsonSyntaxException: java.lang.IllegalStateException:
Expected a string but was BEGIN_ARRAY ... since the class
org.jclouds.openstack.nova.v2_0.domain.Image contains metadata as a
MapString, String but block_device_mapping is an array of objects instead
of a String.
This issue seems present in 1.8.x and 2.0.0
A modification of the test case
jclouds/apis/openstack-nova/src/test/resources/image_details.json explains
the problem :
put:
{code}
metadata: {
ImageType: Gold,
ImageVersion: 1.5,
block_device_mapping: [{guest_format: null, boot_index: 0,
no_device: null, volume_id: null, volume_size: null, disk_bus:
virtio, image_id: null, source_type: snapshot, device_type: disk,
snapshot_id: ce746121-7829-4818-bf5b-2b86d48b5ce0, destination_type:
volume, delete_on_termination: null}, {guest_format: null,
boot_index: null, no_device: null, volume_id: null, volume_size:
null, disk_bus: null, image_id: null, source_type: snapshot,
device_type: null, snapshot_id: a659cb24-c84e-472b-8ec2-9e4af8211d08,
destination_type: volume, delete_on_termination: null}]
},
{code}
instead of
{code}
metadata: {
ImageType: Gold,
ImageVersion: 1.5
}
{code}
The message is then:
{code}
testGetImageWhenResponseIs2xx(org.jclouds.openstack.nova.v2_0.features.ImageApiExpectTest)
Time elapsed: 0.006 sec FAILURE!
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Expected a string but was BEGIN_ARRAY at
line 16 column 38 path $.image.metadata.
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
Re: [jclouds] Fix for JCLOUDS-655 (#626)
@@ -85,6 +86,7 @@ public static Status fromValue(String v) {
protected int minDisk;
protected int minRam;
protected Resource server;
+ protected ListBlockDeviceMapping blockDeviceMapping;
This should be initialized with `ImmutableList.of()` (unless there's a really
good reason not to). All of the other Collection types in the domain package
are initialized this way. `blockDeviceMapping` should be the same.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/626/files#r23227753
Re: [jclouds] Fix for JCLOUDS-655 (#626)
@@ -221,6 +229,7 @@ protected Image(String id, @Nullable String name, java.util.SetLink links, @Nu this.progress = progress; this.minDisk = minDisk; this.minRam = minRam; + this.blockDeviceMapping = blockDeviceMapping; Init the same as `metadata` --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/626/files#r23227880
[jclouds-examples] Delete all resources in all regions of an account (#70)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/70 -- Commit Summary -- * Delete all resources in all regions of an account -- File Changes -- A rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/DeleteAll.java (323) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/70.patch https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/70.diff --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/70
Re: [jclouds-site] add softlayer getting started (#134)
+api.getVirtualGuestApi();
+api.getDatacenterApi();
+api.getSoftwareDescriptionApi();
+api.getVirtualGuestBlockDeviceTemplateGroupApi();
+api.getAccountApi();
+
+// Be sure to close the context when done
+computeServiceContext.close();
+{% endhighlight %}
+
+## SoftLayer Object Storage
+SoftLayer Object Storage is an OpenStack® based blobstore storage system.
+
+{% highlight java %}
+// Get a context with softlayer that offers the portable BlobStore API
+BlobStoreContext context = ContextBuilder.newBuilder(swift)
From looking at [Auth
Endpoints](http://sldn.softlayer.com/article/Introduction-Object-Storage#Authentication_Endpoints)
it seems clear it's TempAuth only.
These instructions really shouldn't be written based on deprecated code. We
really don't need another thing blocking us from removing `swift`.
The proper thing to do here is to update the instructions to use the
[SwiftAuthenticationModule](http://jclouds-javadocs.elasticbeanstalk.com/org/jclouds/openstack/swift/v1/config/SwiftAuthenticationModule.html)
When KeystoneProperties.CREDENTIAL_TYPE is set to tempAuthCredentials, do
not use Keystone. Instead, bridge TempAuth to Keystone by faking a service
catalog out of the storage url. The endpoint must be set to the TempAuth url,
usually ending in auth/v1.0/.
Unfortunately that will only be in the next release.
I propose we remove Object Storage from this particular PR and update this
guide with the SwiftAuthenticationModule when the next version of jclouds is
released.
The alternative is to leave it as is (basically recommending users to use
deprecated code) and update this guide with the SwiftAuthenticationModule when
the next version of jclouds is released.
Your call @andreaturli
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/134/files#r23169800
Re: [jclouds] Fix for JCLOUDS-655 (#626)
@monitorjbl Sorry I haven't been able to have a look at this. I've been fighting the flu. @nacx Can you help with the unit test of just the adapter? If not, I can look at it later this week or next. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/626#issuecomment-69770083
[jclouds-labs-openstack] Fix test properties (#175)
You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/rackerlabs/jclouds-labs-openstack fix-test-props Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/175 -- Commit Summary -- * Fix test properties -- File Changes -- M rackspace-cloudfiles-uk/pom.xml (4) M rackspace-cloudfiles-us/pom.xml (4) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/175.patch https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/175.diff --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/175
Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Fix test properties (#175)
Just trying something out. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/175#issuecomment-69256482
Re: [jclouds-labs-openstack] Fix test properties (#175)
Closed #175. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/175#event-216189025
Re: [jclouds-site] add softlayer getting started (#134)
+api.getVirtualGuestApi();
+api.getDatacenterApi();
+api.getSoftwareDescriptionApi();
+api.getVirtualGuestBlockDeviceTemplateGroupApi();
+api.getAccountApi();
+
+// Be sure to close the context when done
+computeServiceContext.close();
+{% endhighlight %}
+
+## SoftLayer Object Storage
+SoftLayer Object Storage is an OpenStack® based blobstore storage system.
+
+{% highlight java %}
+// Get a context with softlayer that offers the portable BlobStore API
+BlobStoreContext context = ContextBuilder.newBuilder(swift)
Is there a version of Softlayer Object Storage that would work with
`openstack-swift`?
`swift` is deprecated and scheduled to be remove in jclouds 2.0.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/134/files#r22688652
Re: [jclouds] Fix for JCLOUDS-655 (#626)
Can you add that test code as a commit so we can see it? (don't squash it) --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/626#issuecomment-69248945
Re: [jclouds-examples] Update Rackspace examples for 1.8.0 (#57)
Closed #57. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/57#event-210986066
Re: [jclouds] Fix for JCLOUDS-655 (#626)
:+1: And note that [BlockDeviceMapping.java](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/apis/openstack-nova/src/main/java/org/jclouds/openstack/nova/v2_0/domain/BlockDeviceMapping.java) already exists. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/626#issuecomment-67863104
[jclouds-examples] Update examples to 1.8.1 (#68)
You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/rackerlabs/jclouds-examples 1-8-1 Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/68 -- Commit Summary -- * Update examples to 1.8.1 -- File Changes -- M rackspace/pom.xml (4) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudfiles/CloudFilesPublish.java (6) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudfiles/CreateContainer.java (2) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudfiles/CrossOriginResourceSharingContainer.java (2) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudfiles/DeleteObjectsAndContainer.java (6) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudfiles/GetContainer.java (2) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudfiles/GetObject.java (2) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudfiles/ListContainers.java (2) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudfiles/ListObjects.java (4) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudfiles/UploadDirectoryToCDN.java (4) M rackspace/src/main/java/org/jclouds/examples/rackspace/cloudfiles/UploadObjects.java (4) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/68.patch https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/68.diff --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/68
Re: [jclouds] Fix for JCLOUDS-655 (#626)
})
protected ServerInternalWithoutImage(String id, @Nullable String
name, java.util.SetLink links, @Nullable String uuid, String tenantId,
- String userId, Date updated, Date created,
@Nullable String hostId, @Nullable String accessIPv4,
- @Nullable String accessIPv6, Server.Status
status, Resource flavor, @Nullable String keyName,
- @Nullable String configDrive,
MultimapString, Address addresses, MapString, String metadata,
- @Nullable ServerExtendedStatus
extendedStatus, @Nullable ServerExtendedAttributes extendedAttributes,
@Nullable String diskConfig) {
+ String userId, Date updated,
Date created, @Nullable String hostId, @Nullable String accessIPv4,
+ @Nullable String accessIPv6,
Server.Status status, Resource flavor, @Nullable String keyName,
+ @Nullable String configDrive,
MultimapString, Address addresses, MapString, String metadata,
+ @Nullable ServerExtendedStatus
extendedStatus, @Nullable ServerExtendedAttributes extendedAttributes,
@Nullable String diskConfig) {
Please undo all of the unintentional updates to the spacing above.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/626/files#r21985663
Re: [jclouds] Fix for JCLOUDS-655 (#626)
@@ -56,9 +61,10 @@
@Singleton
public MapType, Object provideCustomAdapterBindings() {
return ImmutableMap.Type, Objectof(
-HostResourceUsage.class, new HostResourceUsageAdapter(),
-ServerWithSecurityGroups.class, new
ServerWithSecurityGroupsAdapter(),
-Server.class, new ServerAdapter()
+ HostResourceUsage.class, new HostResourceUsageAdapter(),
+ ServerWithSecurityGroups.class, new
ServerWithSecurityGroupsAdapter(),
+ Server.class, new ServerAdapter(),
+ Image.class, new ImageAdapter()
);
Should use 3 space indents.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/626/files#r21985620
