[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12153) Error in deleting Financial Account
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17294983#comment-17294983 ] Pawan Verma commented on OFBIZ-12153: - Hi [~jleroux] I've updated the patch to fix the testCase issue. Here is the patch: [^OFBIZ-12153.patch] EntityAutoEngine's expire method can also expire a field with a name date, so it was not allowing. FinAccount.fromDate is not part of PK, so the engine is attempting to update it and leaving thruDate field. Modified code will update both fields. Let me know your thoughts! > Error in deleting Financial Account > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-12153 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12153 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: accounting >Reporter: Lalit Dashora >Assignee: sourabh jain >Priority: Major > Attachments: FinAccountDelete.png, OFBIZ-12153.patch, > OFBIZ-12153.patch, OFBIZ-12153.patch, OFBIZ-12153.patch > > > 1. Navigate to URL: accounting/control/FindFinAccount > 2. Click on Find button. List of fin account will be displayed. > 3. Click on delete button near available balance column. > The Following Errors Occurred: > Error doing entity-auto operation for entity FinAccount in service > deleteFinAccount: org.apache.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException: > org.apache.ofbiz.entity.GenericDataSourceException: Exception while deleting > the following entity: > [GenericEntity:FinAccount][finAccountId,SC_CHECKING(java.lang.String)] (SQL > Exception while executing the following:null (DELETE on table 'FIN_ACCOUNT' > caused a violation of foreign key constraint 'FINACT_STTS_FNA' for key > (SC_CHECKING). The statement has been rolled back.)) (Exception while > deleting the following entity: > [GenericEntity:FinAccount][finAccountId,SC_CHECKING(java.lang.String)] (SQL > Exception while executing the following:null (DELETE on table 'FIN_ACCOUNT' > caused a violation of foreign key constraint 'FINACT_STTS_FNA' for key > (SC_CHECKING). The statement has been rolled back.))) -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-12153) Error in deleting Financial Account
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pawan Verma updated OFBIZ-12153: Attachment: OFBIZ-12153.patch > Error in deleting Financial Account > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-12153 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12153 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: accounting >Reporter: Lalit Dashora >Assignee: sourabh jain >Priority: Major > Attachments: FinAccountDelete.png, OFBIZ-12153.patch, > OFBIZ-12153.patch, OFBIZ-12153.patch, OFBIZ-12153.patch > > > 1. Navigate to URL: accounting/control/FindFinAccount > 2. Click on Find button. List of fin account will be displayed. > 3. Click on delete button near available balance column. > The Following Errors Occurred: > Error doing entity-auto operation for entity FinAccount in service > deleteFinAccount: org.apache.ofbiz.entity.GenericEntityException: > org.apache.ofbiz.entity.GenericDataSourceException: Exception while deleting > the following entity: > [GenericEntity:FinAccount][finAccountId,SC_CHECKING(java.lang.String)] (SQL > Exception while executing the following:null (DELETE on table 'FIN_ACCOUNT' > caused a violation of foreign key constraint 'FINACT_STTS_FNA' for key > (SC_CHECKING). The statement has been rolled back.)) (Exception while > deleting the following entity: > [GenericEntity:FinAccount][finAccountId,SC_CHECKING(java.lang.String)] (SQL > Exception while executing the following:null (DELETE on table 'FIN_ACCOUNT' > caused a violation of foreign key constraint 'FINACT_STTS_FNA' for key > (SC_CHECKING). The statement has been rolled back.))) -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[GitHub] [ofbiz-plugins] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #57: Ofbiz 11756 vue js renderer
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #57: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-plugins/pull/57#issuecomment-789773667 SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [255 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [3.2% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [ofbiz-plugins] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #57: Ofbiz 11756 vue js renderer
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #57: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-plugins/pull/57#issuecomment-789783792 SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [255 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [3.2% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [ofbiz-plugins] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #57: Ofbiz 11756 vue js renderer
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #57: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-plugins/pull/57#issuecomment-789773667 SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [255 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [3.2% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [ofbiz-plugins] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #57: Ofbiz 11756 vue js renderer
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #57: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-plugins/pull/57#issuecomment-789707856 SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [255 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [3.2% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12154) Form widget "checkbox" do not persist selected value with multiple options checked
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17294559#comment-17294559 ] Nameet Jain commented on OFBIZ-12154: - Thanks [~jleroux] > Form widget "checkbox" do not persist selected value with multiple options > checked > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-12154 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12154 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: framework >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Nameet Jain >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Major > Fix For: Upcoming Branch > > Attachments: OFBIZ-12154.patch, OFBIZ-12154.patch, OFBIZ-12154.patch > > > I tried to use the form-widgets checkbox on my find screen. But when > searching values with multiple options checked, no checkbox appears to be > selected. > I found similar kind of ticket OFBIZ-11933. > Seems the checkbox was replaced by a dropdown here. > I suggest fixing this bug at the framework level. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[GitHub] [ofbiz-plugins] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #57: Ofbiz 11756 vue js renderer
sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #57: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-plugins/pull/57#issuecomment-778302411 SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [220 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [3.2% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [ofbiz-plugins] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #57: Ofbiz 11756 vue js renderer
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #57: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-plugins/pull/57#issuecomment-789707856 SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [255 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=false=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) [3.2% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-plugins=57=new_duplicated_lines_density=list) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-12192) Replace Bintray by a new place to upload the Gradle Wrapper
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17294450#comment-17294450 ] Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-12192 at 3/3/21, 10:37 AM: --- As an alternative I proposed to use our own repo (was SVN then): https://markmail.org/message/4cdbkfm47jmcsyim I even provided scripts for that IIRW or at least wrote them locally was (Author: jacques.le.roux): As an alternative I proposed to use our own repo (was SVN then): https://markmail.org/message/4cdbkfm47jmcsyim I even provided scripts for that IIRW or at least from them locally > Replace Bintray by a new place to upload the Gradle Wrapper > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-12192 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12192 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Task > Components: Gradle >Affects Versions: 18.12.01, Trunk, 17.12.06 >Reporter: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Blocker > > We got an issue with Bintray and jcenter : > [https://markmail.org/message/hal4od7xeoig6xfw] > The jcenter aspect is now fixed with OFBIZ-12171 (actually jcenter will allow > download until February 1st 2022) > With our need to upload the Gradle Wrapper we have though still an issue with > Bintray: [https://markmail.org/message/74u6wsldx3ykzqiv] > The problem is once we release a package the scripts at > [https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/tree/trunk/gradle] are freezed. So > people using these scripts will not be able to download the related Gradle > Wrapper versions. > So we need to replace Bintray by another place to upload the different > versions of the Gradle Wrapper. All supported OFBiz versions are concerned. > Note: I have already put > [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Load+new+gradle+wrapper+version+on+bintray] > in Wiki Attic -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12192) Replace Bintray by a new place to upload the Gradle Wrapper
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17294450#comment-17294450 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-12192: - As an alternative I proposed to use our own repo (was SVN then): https://markmail.org/message/4cdbkfm47jmcsyim I even provided scripts for that IIRW or at least from them locally > Replace Bintray by a new place to upload the Gradle Wrapper > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-12192 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12192 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Task > Components: Gradle >Affects Versions: 18.12.01, Trunk, 17.12.06 >Reporter: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Blocker > > We got an issue with Bintray and jcenter : > [https://markmail.org/message/hal4od7xeoig6xfw] > The jcenter aspect is now fixed with OFBIZ-12171 (actually jcenter will allow > download until February 1st 2022) > With our need to upload the Gradle Wrapper we have though still an issue with > Bintray: [https://markmail.org/message/74u6wsldx3ykzqiv] > The problem is once we release a package the scripts at > [https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/tree/trunk/gradle] are freezed. So > people using these scripts will not be able to download the related Gradle > Wrapper versions. > So we need to replace Bintray by another place to upload the different > versions of the Gradle Wrapper. All supported OFBiz versions are concerned. > Note: I have already put > [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Load+new+gradle+wrapper+version+on+bintray] > in Wiki Attic -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-12154) Form widget "checkbox" do not persist selected value with multiple options checked
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-12154. --- Fix Version/s: Upcoming Branch Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Resolution: Implemented > Form widget "checkbox" do not persist selected value with multiple options > checked > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-12154 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12154 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: framework >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Nameet Jain >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Major > Fix For: Upcoming Branch > > Attachments: OFBIZ-12154.patch, OFBIZ-12154.patch, OFBIZ-12154.patch > > > I tried to use the form-widgets checkbox on my find screen. But when > searching values with multiple options checked, no checkbox appears to be > selected. > I found similar kind of ticket OFBIZ-11933. > Seems the checkbox was replaced by a dropdown here. > I suggest fixing this bug at the framework level. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-11933) Checkbox not selected after searching with multiple options checked in form widget
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17294447#comment-17294447 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on OFBIZ-11933: - Commit 000473c7ed7eb5d2d6118ec6da39aba43f58be02 in ofbiz-framework's branch refs/heads/trunk from Jacques Le Roux [ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ofbiz-framework.git;h=000473c ] Improved: Form widget "checkbox" do not persist selected value with multiple options checked (OFBIZ-12154) I tried to use the form-widgets checkbox on a custom find screen. But after searching values with option/s checked, no checkbox remains selected. I found similar kind of ticket OFBIZ-11933. The checkbox was replaced by usage of the asmselect jQuery plugin This fixes the bug at the framework level. jleroux: fixes checkstyle issues: missing spaces after (3) if Thanks: Nameet Jain > Checkbox not selected after searching with multiple options checked in form > widget > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-11933 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11933 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ALL COMPONENTS >Reporter: Akash Jain >Assignee: Akash Jain >Priority: Minor > Fix For: Upcoming Branch > > Attachments: OFBIZ-11933.patch > > > No checkbox appears as selected when we click on find button even though the > order is filtered, this is happening on all the screens where form-widget is > used, as tag has an attribute all-check for checkboxes which is set > to false. > If the value of the checkbox is false then whenever the page loads, it > unchecks all checkboxes and displays no checkbox as selected, but filters the > result correctly. > If we remove this attribute from the check element then it is working fine in > case of single checkbox selection, but if multiple checkboxes are selected > then again it shows all checkboxes as unchecked. > This happens on all the find forms which are implemented using form-widgets. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12154) Form widget "checkbox" do not persist selected value with multiple options checked
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17294446#comment-17294446 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on OFBIZ-12154: - Commit 000473c7ed7eb5d2d6118ec6da39aba43f58be02 in ofbiz-framework's branch refs/heads/trunk from Jacques Le Roux [ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ofbiz-framework.git;h=000473c ] Improved: Form widget "checkbox" do not persist selected value with multiple options checked (OFBIZ-12154) I tried to use the form-widgets checkbox on a custom find screen. But after searching values with option/s checked, no checkbox remains selected. I found similar kind of ticket OFBIZ-11933. The checkbox was replaced by usage of the asmselect jQuery plugin This fixes the bug at the framework level. jleroux: fixes checkstyle issues: missing spaces after (3) if Thanks: Nameet Jain > Form widget "checkbox" do not persist selected value with multiple options > checked > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-12154 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12154 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: framework >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Nameet Jain >Priority: Major > Attachments: OFBIZ-12154.patch, OFBIZ-12154.patch, OFBIZ-12154.patch > > > I tried to use the form-widgets checkbox on my find screen. But when > searching values with multiple options checked, no checkbox appears to be > selected. > I found similar kind of ticket OFBIZ-11933. > Seems the checkbox was replaced by a dropdown here. > I suggest fixing this bug at the framework level. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12154) Form widget "checkbox" do not persist selected value with multiple options checked
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17294445#comment-17294445 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-12154: - Please Nameet, take care of checkstyle. I'll do it again for you as it's easy but that should not be negected ;) bq. jleroux: fixes checkstyle issues: missing spaces after (3) if > Form widget "checkbox" do not persist selected value with multiple options > checked > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-12154 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12154 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: framework >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Nameet Jain >Priority: Major > Attachments: OFBIZ-12154.patch, OFBIZ-12154.patch, OFBIZ-12154.patch > > > I tried to use the form-widgets checkbox on my find screen. But when > searching values with multiple options checked, no checkbox appears to be > selected. > I found similar kind of ticket OFBIZ-11933. > Seems the checkbox was replaced by a dropdown here. > I suggest fixing this bug at the framework level. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12192) Replace Bintray by a new place to upload the Gradle Wrapper
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17294368#comment-17294368 ] Michael Brohl commented on OFBIZ-12192: --- Is there anything that prevents us from doing this according to [https://infra.apache.org/publishing-maven-artifacts.html] ? If not, I can take the necessary steps to do it. > Replace Bintray by a new place to upload the Gradle Wrapper > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-12192 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12192 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Task > Components: Gradle >Affects Versions: 18.12.01, Trunk, 17.12.06 >Reporter: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Blocker > > We got an issue with Bintray and jcenter : > [https://markmail.org/message/hal4od7xeoig6xfw] > The jcenter aspect is now fixed with OFBIZ-12171 (actually jcenter will allow > download until February 1st 2022) > With our need to upload the Gradle Wrapper we have though still an issue with > Bintray: [https://markmail.org/message/74u6wsldx3ykzqiv] > The problem is once we release a package the scripts at > [https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/tree/trunk/gradle] are freezed. So > people using these scripts will not be able to download the related Gradle > Wrapper versions. > So we need to replace Bintray by another place to upload the different > versions of the Gradle Wrapper. All supported OFBiz versions are concerned. > Note: I have already put > [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Load+new+gradle+wrapper+version+on+bintray] > in Wiki Attic -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12191) Bug preventing proper explosion of BOM containing virtual nodes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17294367#comment-17294367
]
Nameet Jain commented on OFBIZ-12191:
-
Thanks Jacopo
> Bug preventing proper explosion of BOM containing virtual nodes
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-12191
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12191
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: manufacturing
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Nameet Jain
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: OFBIZ-12191.patch, OFBIZ-12191_sample-data.xml,
> image-2021-02-27-18-37-47-422.png
>
>
> I tried the following use case. We configured BOM for the virtual product
> whose nodes can also be virtual.
>
> {code:java}
> // Product To Be produced
> PROD_MANUF_1 (Virtual Product)
> - PROD_MANUF_11 (Variant)
> - PROD_MANUF_12 (Variant)
>
> // Raw Material
> RAW_MAT_1 (Virtual)
> - RAW_MAT_11 (Variant)
> - RAW_MAT_12 (Variant)
>
> RAW_MAT_2 (Standard)
> // BOM
> PROD_MANUF_1-> RAW_MAT_1
> -> RAW_MAT_2
> PROD_MANUF_11 -> RAW_MAT_11 -> 2 Qty
> -> RAW_MAT_2 -> 2 Qty
>
>
> PROD_MANUF_12 -> RAW_MAT_12 -> 3 Qty
> -> RAW_MAT_2 -> 2 Qty {code}
> Now let say we want to manufacture 10qty of PROD_MANUF_12. To my
> expectations, the requirement generated should be like
> - To produce 10qty for PROD_MANUF_12 we will need
> - 30qty of RAW_MAT_12
> - 20qty of RAW_MAT_2
> But the result for MRP and BOM simulation is incorrect. Please refer to the
> screenshot.
> !image-2021-02-27-18-37-47-422.png!
> _I am also attaching sample data to test._
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
