notmuch painfully slow
Hi, On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:04:13 +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > > thank you all for your answers! I second that and thanks to your performance page, I finally switched to chert format database. That's day and night ! Thank you ! /Xavier
Re: notmuch painfully slow
Hi, On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:04:13 +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > > thank you all for your answers! I second that and thanks to your performance page, I finally switched to chert format database. That's day and night ! Thank you ! /Xavier ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: storing From and Subject in xapian
Austin Clements writes: > This is awesome. What was your machine configuration? Reasonably modern linux box, Core i5. Both the xapian db and the mail files are on the same 7200 RPM SATA drive, ext4 filesystem. I guess the SSD might explain why you your uncached results are not as bad as mine. My test search matches 8800 messages grouped into 5550 threads. Wit the patch cached results go from 2.5 secs to 1.5, uncached goes from 40 secs to 6. Thanks for the clue on the missing subject lines, your change does indeed fix the problem! -- Istvan ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
storing From and Subject in xapian
Austin Clements writes: > This is awesome. What was your machine configuration? Reasonably modern linux box, Core i5. Both the xapian db and the mail files are on the same 7200 RPM SATA drive, ext4 filesystem. I guess the SSD might explain why you your uncached results are not as bad as mine. My test search matches 8800 messages grouped into 5550 threads. Wit the patch cached results go from 2.5 secs to 1.5, uncached goes from 40 secs to 6. Thanks for the clue on the missing subject lines, your change does indeed fix the problem! -- Istvan
[PATCH v3] test/search: add check for slightly tricky search
It's not really tricky, there are many addresses with a '-' in them. I personally really want to differentiate between foo at bar.com, foo-testing at bar.com, and foo-patches at bar.com. This fails, but it shouldn't: FAIL Search by from (tricky): --- search.17.expected 2011-05-04 21:52:52.913218077 + +++ search.17.output2011-05-04 21:52:52.913218077 + @@ -1 +1,3 @@ +thread:XXX 2000-01-01 [1/1] Search By From Name; search by from (name) (inbox unread) +thread:XXX 2000-01-01 [1/1] search-by-from-trick at foo.com; search by from (tricky trick) (inbox unread) thread:XXX 2000-01-01 [1/1] search-by-from at foo.com; search by from (tricky) (inbox unread) One possibility to make this work is to translate @ to -at- in the database, so search-by-from at foo.com becomes search-by-from-trick-at-foo.com, therefore searching for search-by-from-at- would not be confused. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras --- test/search |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/search b/test/search index b180c7f..c6223f4 100755 --- a/test/search +++ b/test/search @@ -123,4 +123,10 @@ echo -n > expected && notmuch search "no-message-matches-this" > actual && test_cmp expected actual' +test_begin_subtest "Search by from (tricky):" +add_message '[subject]="search by from (tricky trick)"' '[date]="Sat, 01 Jan 2000 12:00:00 -"' '[from]=search-by-from-trick at foo.com' +add_message '[subject]="search by from (tricky)"' '[date]="Sat, 01 Jan 2000 12:00:00 -"' '[from]=search-by-from at foo.com' +output=$(notmuch search from:"search-by-from@" | notmuch_search_sanitize) +test_expect_equal "$output" "thread:XXX 2000-01-01 [1/1] search-by-from at foo.com; search by from (tricky) (inbox unread)" + test_done -- 1.7.5
