[PATCH] build: produce signatures for release candidate tarballs.
Today Defalos on #notmuch asked for a signed tarball for 0.30~rc2. This is a minimal change to support this in the future. The question of automagically uploading will need more thought; currently I like the fact that tags from pre-releases are only pushed manually. --- Makefile.local | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Makefile.local b/Makefile.local index 586cdf75..d2cdb647 100644 --- a/Makefile.local +++ b/Makefile.local @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ pre-release: $(MAKE) VERSION=$(VERSION) test git tag -s -m "$(PACKAGE) $(VERSION) release" $(UPSTREAM_TAG) git tag -s -m "$(PACKAGE) Debian $(VERSION)-1 upload (same as $(VERSION))" $(DEB_TAG) - $(MAKE) VERSION=$(VERSION) $(TAR_FILE) + $(MAKE) VERSION=$(VERSION) $(SHA256_FILE) $(DETACHED_SIG_FILE) ln -sf $(TAR_FILE) $(DEB_TAR_FILE) pristine-tar commit $(DEB_TAR_FILE) $(UPSTREAM_TAG) mkdir -p releases -- 2.27.0 ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: Feature freeze for notmuch 0.30: June 1
I've tagged a 3rd release candidate (which is of course rc2, because this week I belong to the cult of 0 based indexing). All of the blockers I know of are fixed, and I'd consider us in "deep freeze", hopefully to release in a week or so if there are no nasty bugs discovered. Please test. Debian users can grab it from Debian experimental (really this time, previously it had to go though NEW). signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: [PATCH] Support aborting the atomic context
Floris Bruynooghe writes: > Since it is possible to use an atomic context to abort a number of > changes support this usage. Because the only way to actually abort > the transaction is to close the database this must also do so. merged to release and master, with a note about the anticipated update path. d ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: python: Continuing message re-use fix
Floris Bruynooghe writes: > Hi, > > This builds on the patch by Anton Khirnov to fix the message re-use > that is possible when accessing messages from a thread. I started > with just addressing my own comments on this patch, but evolved it > into switching the logic around and leave the normal Message object > untouched. Instead I created a new OwnedMessage which is used by > the Thread which does not free itself on __del__(). I think this > is preferable because the other iterators, mainly Database.messages(), > do not allow retrieving messages more than once since the query object > is hidden from the API. > > I've left the original commit in this patch series to not alter any > contributions. > > Cheers, > Floris Revised series merged to master and release. Thanks for your help with these updates. d ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch