Re: [PATCH 7/9] test: ruby: use much more standard Ruby idioms
Tomi Ollila writes: > > I am convinced that this is good change (like all the other changes > in this series). > > Every now and then I encounter ruby code, and have seen syntax like > `@q.search_threads.each do |t|` been used, so more exposure to that > syntax is good thing (for everyone (IMO)) > OK, I've applied the patch (and the others in the series). I have my (already expressed) reservations, but I don't want to stand in the way of progress on the ruby bindings. d ___ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
Re: [RFE] Call `gpg --recv-keys` asynchronously
David Bremner writes: > Do I misunderstand, or was this fixed in a1d6e406f6f ? Yes, this was fixed long ago. Thanks! - Steven signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
Re: [PATCH] emacs: restore tag-changes and query bindings for tag hooks
Kyle Meyer writes: > +;; `dlet' isn't available until Emacs 28.1. Below is a copy, with the > +;; addition of `with-no-warnings'. > +(defmacro notmuch-dlet (binders body) > + "Like `let*' but using dynamic scoping." > + (declare (indent 1) (debug let)) > + `(let (_) > + (with-no-warnings ; Quiet "lacks a prefix" warning. > + ,@(mapcar (lambda (binder) > +`(defvar ,(if (consp binder) (car binder) binder))) > + binders)) > + (let* ,binders ,@body))) > + > (provide 'notmuch-compat) What do you think Jonas, is this a reasonable approach? d ___ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
Re: Possible threading issues in nm 0.32
Michael J Gruber writes: > After updating to notmuch 0.32 I noticed a few strange threadings that > went away after downgrading to 0.31.3 and reindexing. I can't pin-point > that yet but wanted to give an early warning so you can look out for > that, too. I'm not aware of any threading relevant changes in 0.32, but there was a lot of churn in the library. If you could bisect or give a reproducer that would be great. ___ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
Possible threading issues in nm 0.32
Hi there After updating to notmuch 0.32 I noticed a few strange threadings that went away after downgrading to 0.31.3 and reindexing. I can't pin-point that yet but wanted to give an early warning so you can look out for that, too. My setup: mail is fetched with mbsync and indexed with "notmuch new" (with afew run from pre and post hooks in move and tag mode, using the notmuch bindings). "Strange threadings": Unrelated mails without relevant headers (references, in-reply-to) from different folders end up in the same thread with nm 0.32; reindexing the thread with nm 0.31 puts them in different threads as expected. I am using a mix of file and db config as is usual pre 0.32 but that should not affect threading, I think. Michael ___ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
