Re: [PATCH] configure: detect version by compiler for build

2020-07-28 Thread Đoàn Trần Công Danh
On 2020-07-28 08:25:00-0300, David Bremner  wrote:
> Đoàn Trần Công Danh  writes:
> 
> >
> > Other compile and try run linked with libraries in (autotools') host
> > architecture.
> >
> > Linking with build's libraries doesn't make sense, hence I ignored it.
> > And patched downstream.
> >
> > I don't mind dropping this change and carry it downstream.
> >
> 
> I'm afraid I don't understand the reference to autotools here. Are you
> embedding the build of notmuch in some packaging system that thinks
> everything is autotools?

Yes, this patch was inspired by patching for a packaging system that
have all autotools' required variable exported.

> I agree with Tomi that changing this one
> relatively minor use of CC in isolation does not make sense.  I'm not
> opposed to upstreaming packaging inspired changes, but generally I would
> like to see how they help more than just one packager.

Nowaday, most distro only cross-compiles some base system then build
other packages native-like with qemu-user-static. Except very limited
set of distro and some distro for embedded system, but notmuch is
unlikely shipped notmuch, so this could help only single packager.

So, I think this patch should be dropped.


-- 
Danh
___
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org


Re: [PATCH] configure: detect version by compiler for build

2020-07-28 Thread David Bremner
Đoàn Trần Công Danh  writes:

>
> Other compile and try run linked with libraries in (autotools') host
> architecture.
>
> Linking with build's libraries doesn't make sense, hence I ignored it.
> And patched downstream.
>
> I don't mind dropping this change and carry it downstream.
>

I'm afraid I don't understand the reference to autotools here. Are you
embedding the build of notmuch in some packaging system that thinks
everything is autotools?  I agree with Tomi that changing this one
relatively minor use of CC in isolation does not make sense.  I'm not
opposed to upstreaming packaging inspired changes, but generally I would
like to see how they help more than just one packager.


___
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org


Re: [PATCH] configure: detect version by compiler for build

2020-07-27 Thread Đoàn Trần Công Danh
On 2020-07-27 20:31:59+0300, Tomi Ollila  wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27 2020, Đoàn Trần Công Danh wrote:
> 
> > We'll need to run the compiled binary to report our current version.
> >
> > With the same code base, we should have the same version information
> > regardless of compiler and architecture.
> >
> > Let's use the compiler for building architecture to build the reporting
> > binary. Which is usually reported under variable CC_FOR_BUILD,
> > a convention established by GNU Autotools, and fall back to CC if it's
> > not defined.
> 
> We'd probably need to change quite a few other compiled and run binaries
> in configure... otherwise this would be incomplete change (and thus just
> adds confusion ?)

Other compile and try run linked with libraries in (autotools') host
architecture.

Linking with build's libraries doesn't make sense, hence I ignored it.
And patched downstream.

I don't mind dropping this change and carry it downstream.

> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh 
> > ---
> >  configure | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/configure b/configure
> > index 98f5f1ea..db3538b3 100755
> > --- a/configure
> > +++ b/configure
> > @@ -85,8 +85,10 @@ fi
> >  BASHCMD=${BASHCMD:-bash}
> >  PERL=${PERL:-perl}
> >  CC=${CC:-cc}
> > +CC_FOR_BUILD=${CC_FOR_BUILD:-$CC}
> >  CXX=${CXX:-c++}
> >  CFLAGS=${CFLAGS:--g -O2}
> > +CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD=${CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD:-$CFLAGS}
> >  CPPFLAGS=${CPPFLAGS:-}
> >  CXXFLAGS_for_sh=${CXXFLAGS:-${CFLAGS}}
> >  CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS:-\$(CFLAGS)}
> > @@ -410,7 +412,7 @@ int main(void) {
> >  return 0;
> >  }
> >  EOF
> > -if ${CC} ${CFLAGS} -I"$srcdir" _libversion.c -o _libversion > /dev/null 
> > 2>&1 \
> > +if ${CC_FOR_BUILD} ${CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD} -I"$srcdir" _libversion.c -o 
> > _libversion > /dev/null 2>&1 \
> > && ./_libversion > _libversion.sh && . ./_libversion.sh
> >  then
> >  printf "OK.\n"
> > -- 
> > 2.28.0.rc2.21.g5c06d60fc5
> > ___
> > notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org

-- 
Danh
___
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org


Re: [PATCH] configure: detect version by compiler for build

2020-07-27 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Mon, Jul 27 2020, Đoàn Trần Công Danh wrote:

> We'll need to run the compiled binary to report our current version.
>
> With the same code base, we should have the same version information
> regardless of compiler and architecture.
>
> Let's use the compiler for building architecture to build the reporting
> binary. Which is usually reported under variable CC_FOR_BUILD,
> a convention established by GNU Autotools, and fall back to CC if it's
> not defined.

We'd probably need to change quite a few other compiled and run binaries
in configure... otherwise this would be incomplete change (and thus just
adds confusion ?)

>
> Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh 
> ---
>  configure | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> index 98f5f1ea..db3538b3 100755
> --- a/configure
> +++ b/configure
> @@ -85,8 +85,10 @@ fi
>  BASHCMD=${BASHCMD:-bash}
>  PERL=${PERL:-perl}
>  CC=${CC:-cc}
> +CC_FOR_BUILD=${CC_FOR_BUILD:-$CC}
>  CXX=${CXX:-c++}
>  CFLAGS=${CFLAGS:--g -O2}
> +CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD=${CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD:-$CFLAGS}
>  CPPFLAGS=${CPPFLAGS:-}
>  CXXFLAGS_for_sh=${CXXFLAGS:-${CFLAGS}}
>  CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS:-\$(CFLAGS)}
> @@ -410,7 +412,7 @@ int main(void) {
>  return 0;
>  }
>  EOF
> -if ${CC} ${CFLAGS} -I"$srcdir" _libversion.c -o _libversion > /dev/null 2>&1 
> \
> +if ${CC_FOR_BUILD} ${CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD} -I"$srcdir" _libversion.c -o 
> _libversion > /dev/null 2>&1 \
> && ./_libversion > _libversion.sh && . ./_libversion.sh
>  then
>  printf "OK.\n"
> -- 
> 2.28.0.rc2.21.g5c06d60fc5
> ___
> notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
___
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org


[PATCH] configure: detect version by compiler for build

2020-07-27 Thread Đoàn Trần Công Danh
We'll need to run the compiled binary to report our current version.

With the same code base, we should have the same version information
regardless of compiler and architecture.

Let's use the compiler for building architecture to build the reporting
binary. Which is usually reported under variable CC_FOR_BUILD,
a convention established by GNU Autotools, and fall back to CC if it's
not defined.

Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh 
---
 configure | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 98f5f1ea..db3538b3 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -85,8 +85,10 @@ fi
 BASHCMD=${BASHCMD:-bash}
 PERL=${PERL:-perl}
 CC=${CC:-cc}
+CC_FOR_BUILD=${CC_FOR_BUILD:-$CC}
 CXX=${CXX:-c++}
 CFLAGS=${CFLAGS:--g -O2}
+CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD=${CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD:-$CFLAGS}
 CPPFLAGS=${CPPFLAGS:-}
 CXXFLAGS_for_sh=${CXXFLAGS:-${CFLAGS}}
 CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS:-\$(CFLAGS)}
@@ -410,7 +412,7 @@ int main(void) {
 return 0;
 }
 EOF
-if ${CC} ${CFLAGS} -I"$srcdir" _libversion.c -o _libversion > /dev/null 2>&1 \
+if ${CC_FOR_BUILD} ${CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD} -I"$srcdir" _libversion.c -o 
_libversion > /dev/null 2>&1 \
&& ./_libversion > _libversion.sh && . ./_libversion.sh
 then
 printf "OK.\n"
-- 
2.28.0.rc2.21.g5c06d60fc5
___
notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org
To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org