Re: [PATCH] crypto: Avoid pretending to verify signatures on unsigned encrypted mail

2019-04-26 Thread David Bremner
Daniel Kahn Gillmor  writes:

> Unsigned encrypted mail shows up with a weird empty signature list.
> If we successfully decrypted and there was no signature in it, we
> should just not show a sigstatus at all.
>
> The documentation for g_mime_decrypt_result_get_signatures says:
>
> a GMimeSignatureList or NULL if the stream was not signed.

pushed to master,

d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


Re: [PATCH] crypto: Avoid pretending to verify signatures on unsigned encrypted mail

2019-04-24 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Sat 2019-04-20 13:02:57 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Unsigned encrypted mail shows up with a weird empty signature list.
> If we successfully decrypted and there was no signature in it, we
> should just not show a sigstatus at all.

Just a ping on this -- i don't think it should be particularly
controversial, and the tests all pass!

--dkg
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


[PATCH] crypto: Avoid pretending to verify signatures on unsigned encrypted mail

2019-04-20 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Unsigned encrypted mail shows up with a weird empty signature list.
If we successfully decrypted and there was no signature in it, we
should just not show a sigstatus at all.

The documentation for g_mime_decrypt_result_get_signatures says:

a GMimeSignatureList or NULL if the stream was not signed.
---
 mime-node.c | 2 +-
 test/T350-crypto.sh | 1 -
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

This was originally sent to the list as part of a longer patch series
in id:20180511055544.13676-3-...@fifthhorseman.net but i think it
stands alone, and it would help me to reduce the size of the
outstanding patch series to get it applied to master :)

diff --git a/mime-node.c b/mime-node.c
index 2a24e537..1bfb479b 100644
--- a/mime-node.c
+++ b/mime-node.c
@@ -218,12 +218,12 @@ node_decrypt_and_verify (mime_node_t *node, GMimeObject 
*part,
 }
 
 node->decrypt_success = true;
-node->verify_attempted = true;
 
 if (decrypt_result) {
/* This may be NULL if the part is not signed. */
node->sig_list = g_mime_decrypt_result_get_signatures (decrypt_result);
if (node->sig_list) {
+   node->verify_attempted = true;
g_object_ref (node->sig_list);
set_signature_list_destructor (node);
}
diff --git a/test/T350-crypto.sh b/test/T350-crypto.sh
index 73aa58de..80d57847 100755
--- a/test/T350-crypto.sh
+++ b/test/T350-crypto.sh
@@ -271,7 +271,6 @@ expected='[[[{"id": "X",
  "Date": "Sat, 01 Jan 2000 12:00:00 +"},
  "body": [{"id": 1,
  "encstatus": [{"status": "good"}],
- "sigstatus": [],
  "content-type": "multipart/encrypted",
  "content": [{"id": 2,
  "content-type": "application/pgp-encrypted",
-- 
2.20.1

___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch