[PATCH 0/3] build fixes

2010-07-17 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Dirk Hohndel  wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:17:00 +0300, Felipe Contreras  gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is anything wrong with these patches?
>
> cworth - our fearless leader - is extremely busy with his day job right
> now. He tends to respond to all the patches on the mailing list as soon
> as he finds time; sometimes within minutes, sometimes it takes weeks...
> you appear to have hit one of the slow spots.

Or months.

However, I don't see what prevents other people from commenting.
Considering this notmuch is not currently building on Fedora 13, and
people have reported such issue in the mailing list, I think this
should be high priority. Besides, it's only a matter of time before
other distributions start failing to compile too.

-- 
Felipe Contreras


[PATCH 0/3] build fixes

2010-06-15 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:17:00 +0300, Felipe Contreras  wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is anything wrong with these patches?

cworth - our fearless leader - is extremely busy with his day job right
now. He tends to respond to all the patches on the mailing list as soon
as he finds time; sometimes within minutes, sometimes it takes weeks... 
you appear to have hit one of the slow spots.

/D

-- 
Dirk Hohndel
Intel Open Source Technology Center


Re: [PATCH 0/3] build fixes

2010-06-15 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:17:00 +0300, Felipe Contreras 
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Is anything wrong with these patches?

cworth - our fearless leader - is extremely busy with his day job right
now. He tends to respond to all the patches on the mailing list as soon
as he finds time; sometimes within minutes, sometimes it takes weeks... 
you appear to have hit one of the slow spots.

/D

-- 
Dirk Hohndel
Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


[PATCH 0/3] build fixes

2010-06-14 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi,

Is anything wrong with these patches?

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Felipe Contreras
 wrote:
> The important one is #2, which allows to build on Fedora 13.
>
> Felipe Contreras (3):
> ?configure: check platform beforehand
> ?build: fix DSO dependencies
> ?configure: optimize uname finding a bit
>
> ?Makefile.local | ? ?3 --
> ?configure ? ? ?| ? 74 
> 
> ?2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

-- 
Felipe Contreras


Re: [PATCH 0/3] build fixes

2010-06-14 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi,

Is anything wrong with these patches?

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
 The important one is #2, which allows to build on Fedora 13.

 Felipe Contreras (3):
  configure: check platform beforehand
  build: fix DSO dependencies
  configure: optimize uname finding a bit

  Makefile.local |    3 --
  configure      |   74 
 
  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

-- 
Felipe Contreras
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


[PATCH 0/3] build fixes

2010-06-05 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi,

The important one is #2, which allows to build on Fedora 13.

Felipe Contreras (3):
  configure: check platform beforehand
  build: fix DSO dependencies
  configure: optimize uname finding a bit

 Makefile.local |3 --
 configure  |   74 
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)



[PATCH 0/3] build fixes

2010-06-05 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi,

The important one is #2, which allows to build on Fedora 13.

Felipe Contreras (3):
  configure: check platform beforehand
  build: fix DSO dependencies
  configure: optimize uname finding a bit

 Makefile.local |3 --
 configure  |   74 
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch