Re: Last call for NEWS entries for 0.31
Dan Čermák writes: > David Bremner writes: > >> Dan Čermák writes: >> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> David Bremner writes: >>> >>> I have started seeing consistent test failures with rc2 on ppc64 and >>> ppc64le: >>> - on both platforms "get total messages with closed database" from >>> T568-lib-thread fails >> >> I don't see this failure on ppc64el on Debian [0]. Perhaps there is some >> toolchain difference? > > This specific issue has now disappeared on both ppc64 and ppc64el, so I > guess it was just some toolchain breakage that got fixed in the > meantime. I was wrong, "get total messages with closed database" from T568-lib-thread still fails sometimes on ppc64, but unfortunately not consistently. It appears to mostly fail on a worker with relatively little memory (3584 MB vs 8192 MB or 11264MB). I'll try to keep an eye out on that hoping to find some indicator what could be wrong. Cheers, Dan signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
Re: Last call for NEWS entries for 0.31
Dan Čermák writes: > David Bremner writes: > >> Dan Čermák writes: >> >>> - on ppc64 "comparing existing to exported symbols" from >>> T360-symbol-hiding fails as well >> >> This is more-or-less known [1]. The problem is that ppc64 reports >> defined functions as 'D' in nm output. At least on ELF architectures, >> readelf -Ws is more reliable. How many people would using readelf break >> things for? Currently the test does not run on macOS, afaik. > > So it is ok if I just skip this test on ppc64? Or can anything be done > about this (I must admit that I have relatively little insight into > this)? I'd say it's OK to skip it for now. Hopefully we will fix it for the next release; I didn't want to make the switch to readelf in the late stages of a release. d ___ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
Re: Last call for NEWS entries for 0.31
David Bremner writes: > Dan Čermák writes: > >> Hi David, >> >> David Bremner writes: >> >> I have started seeing consistent test failures with rc2 on ppc64 and >> ppc64le: >> - on both platforms "get total messages with closed database" from >> T568-lib-thread fails > > I don't see this failure on ppc64el on Debian [0]. Perhaps there is some > toolchain difference? This specific issue has now disappeared on both ppc64 and ppc64el, so I guess it was just some toolchain breakage that got fixed in the meantime. > >> - on ppc64 "comparing existing to exported symbols" from >> T360-symbol-hiding fails as well > > This is more-or-less known [1]. The problem is that ppc64 reports > defined functions as 'D' in nm output. At least on ELF architectures, > readelf -Ws is more reliable. How many people would using readelf break > things for? Currently the test does not run on macOS, afaik. So it is ok if I just skip this test on ppc64? Or can anything be done about this (I must admit that I have relatively little insight into this)? Cheers, Dan signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
Re: Last call for NEWS entries for 0.31
David Bremner writes: > Dan Čermák writes: > >> Hi David, >> >> David Bremner writes: >> >> I have started seeing consistent test failures with rc2 on ppc64 and >> ppc64le: >> - on both platforms "get total messages with closed database" from >> T568-lib-thread fails > > I don't see this failure on ppc64el on Debian [0]. Perhaps there is some > toolchain difference? This specific issue has now disappeared on both ppc64 and ppc64el, so I guess it was just some toolchain breakage that got fixed in the meantime. > >> - on ppc64 "comparing existing to exported symbols" from >> T360-symbol-hiding fails as well > > This is more-or-less known [1]. The problem is that ppc64 reports > defined functions as 'D' in nm output. At least on ELF architectures, > readelf -Ws is more reliable. How many people would using readelf break > things for? Currently the test does not run on macOS, afaik. So it is ok if I just skip this test on ppc64? Or can anything be done about this (I must admit that I have relatively little insight into this)? Cheers, Dan signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
Re: Last call for NEWS entries for 0.31
Dan Čermák writes: > Hi David, > > David Bremner writes: > >> David Bremner writes: >> >>> David Bremner writes: >>> >>> I've sent a couple of patches [1] for things that stood out to >>> me. Please send me anything you think I missed ASAP; I'd like to release >>> the (hopefully) final release candidate tommorow. >> >> I've tagged 0.31~rc2, and uploaded to notmuchmail.org and debian >> experimental. > > I have started seeing consistent test failures with rc2 on ppc64 and > ppc64le: > - on both platforms "get total messages with closed database" from > T568-lib-thread fails I don't see this failure on ppc64el on Debian [0]. Perhaps there is some toolchain difference? > - on ppc64 "comparing existing to exported symbols" from > T360-symbol-hiding fails as well This is more-or-less known [1]. The problem is that ppc64 reports defined functions as 'D' in nm output. At least on ELF architectures, readelf -Ws is more reliable. How many people would using readelf break things for? Currently the test does not run on macOS, afaik. [0]: https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=ppc64el=experimental=buildd_ppc64el-ppc64el-osuosl-01 [1]: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=notmuch=ppc64=0.31%7Erc2-1=1598797686=0 ___ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
Re: Last call for NEWS entries for 0.31
Hi David, David Bremner writes: > David Bremner writes: > >> David Bremner writes: >> >> I've sent a couple of patches [1] for things that stood out to >> me. Please send me anything you think I missed ASAP; I'd like to release >> the (hopefully) final release candidate tommorow. > > I've tagged 0.31~rc2, and uploaded to notmuchmail.org and debian > experimental. I have started seeing consistent test failures with rc2 on ppc64 and ppc64le: - on both platforms "get total messages with closed database" from T568-lib-thread fails - on ppc64 "comparing existing to exported symbols" from T360-symbol-hiding fails as well See: https://build.opensuse.org/public/build/home:dancermak:branches:devel:libraries:c_c++/openSUSE_Factory_PowerPC/ppc64/notmuch/_log and https://build.opensuse.org/public/build/home:dancermak:branches:devel:libraries:c_c++/openSUSE_Factory_PowerPC/ppc64le/notmuch/_log Any ideas what could be the issue? Cheers, Dan signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
Re: Last call for NEWS entries for 0.31
David Bremner writes: > David Bremner writes: > > I've sent a couple of patches [1] for things that stood out to > me. Please send me anything you think I missed ASAP; I'd like to release > the (hopefully) final release candidate tommorow. I've tagged 0.31~rc2, and uploaded to notmuchmail.org and debian experimental. d signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
