update top level argument handling
On Wed, Jan 23 2013, David Bremner wrote: > Jani Nikula writes: > >> >> Patches 1-4 look good, and IMO should be used regardless of the >> bikeshedding result on patches 5-7. > > I pushed the first 4. 6 and 7 will need rebasing if 5 is omitted, which > seems to be the plan. At least it maintains status quo -- and in this particular case it doesn't seem to jam progress ;) > d Tomi
update top level argument handling
Jani Nikula writes: > > Patches 1-4 look good, and IMO should be used regardless of the > bikeshedding result on patches 5-7. I pushed the first 4. 6 and 7 will need rebasing if 5 is omitted, which seems to be the plan. d
Re: update top level argument handling
Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org writes: Patches 1-4 look good, and IMO should be used regardless of the bikeshedding result on patches 5-7. I pushed the first 4. 6 and 7 will need rebasing if 5 is omitted, which seems to be the plan. d ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: update top level argument handling
On Wed, Jan 23 2013, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org writes: Patches 1-4 look good, and IMO should be used regardless of the bikeshedding result on patches 5-7. I pushed the first 4. 6 and 7 will need rebasing if 5 is omitted, which seems to be the plan. At least it maintains status quo -- and in this particular case it doesn't seem to jam progress ;) d Tomi ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
update top level argument handling
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, david at tethera.net wrote: > The only new feature here is an option --leak-report > to notmuch new, as requested in id:m2hangivfu.fsf at guru.guru-group.fi > > There is also a bunch of cleanup of the argument handling. One > casualty of this is that the use of aliases (in particular "notmuch > part" and "notmuch search-tags" is no longer supported). Patches 1-4 look good, and IMO should be used regardless of the bikeshedding result on patches 5-7. BR, Jani. > > ___ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch at notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: update top level argument handling
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, da...@tethera.net wrote: The only new feature here is an option --leak-report to notmuch new, as requested in id:m2hangivfu@guru.guru-group.fi There is also a bunch of cleanup of the argument handling. One casualty of this is that the use of aliases (in particular notmuch part and notmuch search-tags is no longer supported). Patches 1-4 look good, and IMO should be used regardless of the bikeshedding result on patches 5-7. BR, Jani. ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
update top level argument handling
The only new feature here is an option --leak-report to notmuch new, as requested in id:m2hangivfu.fsf at guru.guru-group.fi There is also a bunch of cleanup of the argument handling. One casualty of this is that the use of aliases (in particular "notmuch part" and "notmuch search-tags" is no longer supported).
update top level argument handling
The only new feature here is an option --leak-report to notmuch new, as requested in id:m2hangivfu@guru.guru-group.fi There is also a bunch of cleanup of the argument handling. One casualty of this is that the use of aliases (in particular notmuch part and notmuch search-tags is no longer supported). ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
