[Nouveau] [Bug 62351] Segfault in nouveau_dri.so
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62351 --- Comment #3 from s...@molgaard.org --- I've been rather conservative in specifying the importance, but since it precludes, and apparently Ungifted, from using any form of 3D-accelerated desktop environment, I don't feel wrong in bumping it up a few notches... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Nouveau mailing list Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
[Nouveau] [Bug 62351] Segfault in nouveau_dri.so
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62351 s...@molgaard.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |critical Priority|medium |high -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Nouveau mailing list Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
[Nouveau] [Bug 60150] [NVAF] Garbled Screen
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60150 --- Comment #5 from Bastien Dejean nihilh...@gmail.com --- Tried again with Linux 3.8.3: I could boot without `nomodeset` but the pointer icon, in X, was cropped. On the next reboot the screen was garbled again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Nouveau mailing list Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
Re: [Nouveau] [libdrm PATCH 1/2] nouveau: return error from pushbuf_validate
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:14:53PM +0100, Marcin Slusarz wrote: Without it, libdrm_nouveau user cannot know when validation failed. Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz marcin.slus...@gmail.com --- If there are no objections, I'll push both patches soon. Marcin ___ Nouveau mailing list Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
Re: [Nouveau] [RFC PATCH] drm/nouveau: use vmalloc for pgt allocation
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 07:57:08PM +0100, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
Page tables on nv50 take 48kB, which can be hard to allocate in one piece.
Let's use vmalloc.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz marcin.slus...@gmail.com
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org [3.7+]
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/vm/base.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/vm/base.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/vm/base.c
index 77c67fc..e66fb77 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/vm/base.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/vm/base.c
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ nouveau_vm_create(struct nouveau_vmmgr *vmm, u64 offset,
u64 length,
vm-fpde = offset (vmm-pgt_bits + 12);
vm-lpde = (offset + length - 1) (vmm-pgt_bits + 12);
- vm-pgt = kcalloc(vm-lpde - vm-fpde + 1, sizeof(*vm-pgt),
GFP_KERNEL);
+ vm-pgt = vzalloc((vm-lpde - vm-fpde + 1) * sizeof(*vm-pgt));
if (!vm-pgt) {
kfree(vm);
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ nouveau_vm_create(struct nouveau_vmmgr *vmm, u64 offset,
u64 length,
ret = nouveau_mm_init(vm-mm, mm_offset 12, mm_length 12,
block 12);
if (ret) {
- kfree(vm-pgt);
+ vfree(vm-pgt);
kfree(vm);
return ret;
}
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ nouveau_vm_del(struct nouveau_vm *vm)
}
nouveau_mm_fini(vm-mm);
- kfree(vm-pgt);
+ vfree(vm-pgt);
kfree(vm);
}
--
What's up with this patch?
Marcin
___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
Re: [Nouveau] nouveau lockdep splat
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:30:52PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
Dropping Tegra ML, it's not the place where Nouveau mails should go.
Adding Nouveau ML and Maarten, who probably knows Lockdep+Nouveau best.
Ok,
with the hope of having the right people on CC now (finally, thanks
Lucas :-)), here's the same splat on -rc3. Someone better take a look
soonish, please:
[0.541078] [drm] No driver support for vblank timestamp query.
[0.541272] nouveau [ DRM] 3 available performance level(s)
[0.541276] nouveau [ DRM] 0: core 135MHz shader 270MHz memory 135MHz
voltage 900mV
[0.541280] nouveau [ DRM] 1: core 405MHz shader 810MHz memory 405MHz
voltage 900mV
[0.541284] nouveau [ DRM] 3: core 520MHz shader 1230MHz memory 790MHz
voltage 900mV
[0.541287] nouveau [ DRM] c: core 405MHz shader 810MHz memory 405MHz
voltage 900mV
[0.559846] nouveau [ DRM] MM: using COPY for buffer copies
[0.625371] nouveau [ DRM] allocated 1920x1080 fb: 0x7, bo
88043b54f000
[0.625441] fbcon: nouveaufb (fb0) is primary device
[0.62]
[0.625556] =
[0.625556] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[0.625557] 3.9.0-rc3+ #25 Not tainted
[0.625557] -
[0.625558] swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
[0.625562] (dmac-lock){+.+...}, at: [8141bb63]
evo_wait+0x43/0xf0
[0.625562]
[0.625562] but task is already holding lock:
[0.625564] (dmac-lock){+.+...}, at: [8141bb63]
evo_wait+0x43/0xf0
[0.625565]
[0.625565] other info that might help us debug this:
[0.625565] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[0.625565]
[0.625565]CPU0
[0.625565]
[0.625566] lock(dmac-lock);
[0.625567] lock(dmac-lock);
[0.625567]
[0.625567] *** DEADLOCK ***
[0.625567]
[0.625567] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[0.625567]
[0.625568] 10 locks held by swapper/0/1:
[0.625570] #0: (__lockdep_no_validate__){..}, at:
[814337cb] __driver_attach+0x5b/0xb0
[0.625572] #1: (__lockdep_no_validate__){..}, at:
[814337d9] __driver_attach+0x69/0xb0
[0.625575] #2: (drm_global_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [8135a8e6]
drm_get_pci_dev+0xc6/0x2d0
[0.625578] #3: (registration_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [812c8fc5]
register_framebuffer+0x25/0x310
[0.625581] #4: (fb_info-lock){+.+.+.}, at: [812c7ed6]
lock_fb_info+0x26/0x60
[0.625583] #5: (console_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [812c915a]
register_framebuffer+0x1ba/0x310
[0.625585] #6: ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){.+.+.+}, at:
[810695c2] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x42/0x80
[0.625587] #7: (dev-mode_config.mutex){+.+.+.}, at:
[8135e61a] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x2a/0x70
[0.625589] #8: (crtc-mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [8135e644]
drm_modeset_lock_all+0x54/0x70
[0.625591] #9: (dmac-lock){+.+...}, at: [8141bb63]
evo_wait+0x43/0xf0
[0.625591]
[0.625591] stack backtrace:
[0.625592] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.9.0-rc3+ #25
[0.625593] Call Trace:
[0.625595] [810953fb] __lock_acquire+0x76b/0x1c20
[0.625597] [8137f4ec] ? dcb_table+0x1ac/0x2a0
[0.625599] [81096e1a] lock_acquire+0x8a/0x120
[0.625600] [8141bb63] ? evo_wait+0x43/0xf0
[0.625602] [81615432] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x292/0x330
[0.625603] [8161520e] mutex_lock_nested+0x6e/0x330
[0.625605] [8141bb63] ? evo_wait+0x43/0xf0
[0.625606] [810976eb] ? mark_held_locks+0x9b/0x100
[0.625607] [8141bb63] evo_wait+0x43/0xf0
[0.625609] [8141e603] nv50_display_flip_next+0x713/0x7a0
[0.625611] [8161562e] ? mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10
[0.625612] [8141bc47] ? evo_kick+0x37/0x40
[0.625613] [8141e88e] nv50_crtc_commit+0x10e/0x230
[0.625615] [8134c295] drm_crtc_helper_set_mode+0x365/0x510
[0.625617] [8134d68e] drm_crtc_helper_set_config+0xa4e/0xb70
[0.625618] [8135f731] drm_mode_set_config_internal+0x31/0x70
[0.625619] [8134b791] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x71/0xf0
[0.625621] [812d4234] fbcon_init+0x514/0x5a0
[0.625623] [8132cbfc] visual_init+0xbc/0x120
[0.625624] [8132f2b3] do_bind_con_driver+0x163/0x320
[0.625625] [8132f541] do_take_over_console+0x61/0x70
[0.625627] [812d2853] do_fbcon_takeover+0x63/0xc0
[0.625628] [812d652d] fbcon_event_notify+0x5fd/0x700
[0.625629] [8161c91d] notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
[0.625630] [810695d8] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0x80
[0.625631] [81069616] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
[0.625633] [812c79cb] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20
[0.625634] [812c9168]
Re: [Nouveau] nouveau lockdep splat
[ adding Ben Skeggs and Dave Airlie ]
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 21:24 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:30:52PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
Dropping Tegra ML, it's not the place where Nouveau mails should go.
Adding Nouveau ML and Maarten, who probably knows Lockdep+Nouveau best.
Ok,
with the hope of having the right people on CC now (finally, thanks
Lucas :-)), here's the same splat on -rc3. Someone better take a look
soonish, please:
Also happens in next (on nv50 hardware).
[0.541078] [drm] No driver support for vblank timestamp query.
[0.541272] nouveau [ DRM] 3 available performance level(s)
[0.541276] nouveau [ DRM] 0: core 135MHz shader 270MHz memory 135MHz
voltage 900mV
[0.541280] nouveau [ DRM] 1: core 405MHz shader 810MHz memory 405MHz
voltage 900mV
[0.541284] nouveau [ DRM] 3: core 520MHz shader 1230MHz memory
790MHz voltage 900mV
[0.541287] nouveau [ DRM] c: core 405MHz shader 810MHz memory 405MHz
voltage 900mV
[0.559846] nouveau [ DRM] MM: using COPY for buffer copies
[0.625371] nouveau [ DRM] allocated 1920x1080 fb: 0x7, bo
88043b54f000
[0.625441] fbcon: nouveaufb (fb0) is primary device
[0.62]
[0.625556] =
[0.625556] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[0.625557] 3.9.0-rc3+ #25 Not tainted
[0.625557] -
[0.625558] swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
[0.625562] (dmac-lock){+.+...}, at: [8141bb63]
evo_wait+0x43/0xf0
[0.625562]
[0.625562] but task is already holding lock:
[0.625564] (dmac-lock){+.+...}, at: [8141bb63]
evo_wait+0x43/0xf0
[0.625565]
[0.625565] other info that might help us debug this:
[0.625565] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[0.625565]
[0.625565]CPU0
[0.625565]
[0.625566] lock(dmac-lock);
[0.625567] lock(dmac-lock);
[0.625567]
[0.625567] *** DEADLOCK ***
[0.625567]
[0.625567] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[0.625567]
[0.625568] 10 locks held by swapper/0/1:
[0.625570] #0: (__lockdep_no_validate__){..}, at:
[814337cb] __driver_attach+0x5b/0xb0
[0.625572] #1: (__lockdep_no_validate__){..}, at:
[814337d9] __driver_attach+0x69/0xb0
[0.625575] #2: (drm_global_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [8135a8e6]
drm_get_pci_dev+0xc6/0x2d0
[0.625578] #3: (registration_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [812c8fc5]
register_framebuffer+0x25/0x310
[0.625581] #4: (fb_info-lock){+.+.+.}, at: [812c7ed6]
lock_fb_info+0x26/0x60
[0.625583] #5: (console_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [812c915a]
register_framebuffer+0x1ba/0x310
[0.625585] #6: ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){.+.+.+}, at:
[810695c2] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x42/0x80
[0.625587] #7: (dev-mode_config.mutex){+.+.+.}, at:
[8135e61a] drm_modeset_lock_all+0x2a/0x70
[0.625589] #8: (crtc-mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [8135e644]
drm_modeset_lock_all+0x54/0x70
[0.625591] #9: (dmac-lock){+.+...}, at: [8141bb63]
evo_wait+0x43/0xf0
[0.625591]
[0.625591] stack backtrace:
[0.625592] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.9.0-rc3+ #25
[0.625593] Call Trace:
[0.625595] [810953fb] __lock_acquire+0x76b/0x1c20
[0.625597] [8137f4ec] ? dcb_table+0x1ac/0x2a0
[0.625599] [81096e1a] lock_acquire+0x8a/0x120
[0.625600] [8141bb63] ? evo_wait+0x43/0xf0
[0.625602] [81615432] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x292/0x330
[0.625603] [8161520e] mutex_lock_nested+0x6e/0x330
[0.625605] [8141bb63] ? evo_wait+0x43/0xf0
[0.625606] [810976eb] ? mark_held_locks+0x9b/0x100
[0.625607] [8141bb63] evo_wait+0x43/0xf0
[0.625609] [8141e603] nv50_display_flip_next+0x713/0x7a0
[0.625611] [8161562e] ? mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10
[0.625612] [8141bc47] ? evo_kick+0x37/0x40
[0.625613] [8141e88e] nv50_crtc_commit+0x10e/0x230
[0.625615] [8134c295] drm_crtc_helper_set_mode+0x365/0x510
[0.625617] [8134d68e] drm_crtc_helper_set_config+0xa4e/0xb70
[0.625618] [8135f731] drm_mode_set_config_internal+0x31/0x70
[0.625619] [8134b791] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x71/0xf0
[0.625621] [812d4234] fbcon_init+0x514/0x5a0
[0.625623] [8132cbfc] visual_init+0xbc/0x120
[0.625624] [8132f2b3] do_bind_con_driver+0x163/0x320
[0.625625] [8132f541] do_take_over_console+0x61/0x70
[0.625627] [812d2853] do_fbcon_takeover+0x63/0xc0
[0.625628] [812d652d] fbcon_event_notify+0x5fd/0x700
[0.625629] [8161c91d] notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
[0.625630]
