[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-07-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

Ilia Mirkin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED

--- Comment #130 from Ilia Mirkin  ---
The secboot issue has been resolved for GTX 970's with 4GB of VRAM. If you have
other issues, file other bugs.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-07-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #129 from fariou...@yahoo.fr ---
Created attachment 132829
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=132829=edit
kernel log from fariouche when starting X11

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-07-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #128 from fariou...@yahoo.fr ---
Created attachment 132828
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=132828=edit
Xorg.log file KO for fariouche

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-07-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #127 from fariou...@yahoo.fr ---
Hi,

I finally tried the 4.12.2 kernel, and in my case it does not fully work :(

I can see a working console, but:
- only on my first monitor (DVI)
- no x11 (I can see a brief display of xfce4 but immediately turns black and no
more display, even if I return to the console.)

I think I'm facing 2 different issues. One is about detecting my second monitor
(a 4K LG 31MU97 plugged on DP-0 (this display is maybe a bit slow to probe))
The log shows a lot of error concerning this monitor...

But I do not see anything on my third output too (HDMI, this is an av receiver,
with a full HD tv). No error at all for this one, even the resolution is probed
correctly by xorg.


The kernel log shows an EDID error for the LG monitor...
[1.065917] ACPI: Power Button [PWRF]
[1.066154] Monitor-Mwait will be used to enter C-1 state
[1.066158] Monitor-Mwait will be used to enter C-2 state
[1.066161] Monitor-Mwait will be used to enter C-3 state
[1.067170] ioatdma: Intel(R) QuickData Technology Driver 4.00
[1.067386] Serial: 8250/16550 driver, 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled
[1.067877] Non-volatile memory driver v1.3
[1.068132] Linux agpgart interface v0.103
[1.068546] nouveau :03:00.0: NVIDIA GM204 (124020a1)
[1.158533] nouveau :03:00.0: bios: version 84.04.36.00.0b
[1.158944] nouveau :03:00.0: disp: dcb 15 type 8 unknown
[1.159616] nouveau :03:00.0: fb: 4096 MiB GDDR5
[1.159794] nouveau :03:00.0: bus: MMIO write of 8159 FAULT at
10eb14 [ IBUS ]
[1.168074] [TTM] Zone  kernel: Available graphics memory: 8214682 kiB
[1.168244] [TTM] Zone   dma32: Available graphics memory: 2097152 kiB
[1.168410] [TTM] Initializing pool allocator
[1.168576] [TTM] Initializing DMA pool allocator
[1.168830] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: VRAM: 4096 MiB
[1.168995] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: GART: 1048576 MiB
[1.169161] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: TMDS table version 2.0
[1.169327] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB version 4.1
[1.169492] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 00: 01000f02 00020030
[1.169666] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 01: 02000f00 
[1.169838] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 02: 02811f76 04400020
[1.170004] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 03: 02011f72 00020020
[1.170170] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 04: 04822f86 04400010
[1.170337] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 05: 04022f82 00020010
[1.170504] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 06: 04833f96 04400020
[1.170678] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 07: 04033f92 00020020
[1.170848] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 08: 02044f62 00020010
[1.171015] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB outp 15: 01df5ff8 
[1.171181] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 00: 1030
[1.171347] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 01: 00020146
[1.171511] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 02: 01000246
[1.171684] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 03: 02000346
[1.171853] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 04: 00010461
[1.172018] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DCB conn 05: 0570
[1.172183] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: Pointer to flat panel table invalid
[1.214711] random: fast init done
[1.233460] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: unknown connector type 70
[1.233662] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: failed to create encoder 1/8/0: -19
[1.233834] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: Unknown-1 has no encoders, removing
[1.234034] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013).
[1.234207] [drm] Driver supports precise vblank timestamp query.
[1.276832] nouveau :03:00.0: hwmon_device_register() is deprecated.
Please convert the driver to use hwmon_device_register_with_info().
[1.343188] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: MM: using COPY for buffer copies
[1.434201] nouveau :03:00.0: DP-1: EDID is invalid:
[1.434384]  [00] BAD  03 12 71 45 10 04 03 01 00 23 09 07 07 83 01 00
[1.434568]  [00] BAD  00 02 3a 80 18 71 38 2d 40 58 2c 45 00 b8 6f 21
[1.434759]  [00] BAD  00 00 1e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[1.434939]  [00] BAD  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[1.435121]  [00] BAD  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[1.435301]  [00] BAD  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[1.435482]  [00] BAD  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[1.435670]  [00] BAD  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 44 00
[1.435855] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for DP-1
[1.706882] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: allocated 1920x1200 fb: 0x6, bo
88041cec5800
[1.707396] fbcon: nouveaufb (fb0) is primary device
[1.798548] nouveau :03:00.0: DRM: DDC responded, but no EDID for DP-1
[2.068735] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3197.726 MHz
[2.068740] clocksource: tsc: mask: 

[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-07-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #126 from Yann Golanski  ---
Has anyone tried it with a fresh Fedora 26 install?…

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #125 from Florian Mickler  ---
(Working with a 2 monitor setup and Fedora 25)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #124 from Florian Mickler  ---
Works like a charm now! (4.12-rc1)
4.12.0-0.rc1.git0.1.vanilla.knurd.1.fc25.x86_64

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-05-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #123 from Mikołaj Świątek  ---
As an owner of a MSI GTX970 4G, I can confirm that with 4.12-rc1, I can boot
perfectly fine with a single monitor connected, and with Mesa 17.1.0 on the
userspace side, my user experience with KDE Plasma is thus far
indistinguishable from the NVIDIA blob. Awesome work there, kudos.

Plasma's Wayland session does freeze shortly after login, but that's not
supposed to be mature and can be caused by any amount of things.

Now, if I try to add a second monitor, I get corrupted output after modeset
seemingly, but I'm pretty sure that's bug 89664.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-05-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #122 from Pierre Moreau  ---
(In reply to Yann Golanski from comment #121)
> I am happy to wait till 4.12 is released on Fedora but would like to know it
> works: several comments pointed to it being flaky…

Hans Petter had X working (though not Wayland) by cherry-picking those commits
and Bernie had it working as well with Ben's tree.
The others tested different patches.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-05-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #121 from Yann Golanski  ---
(In reply to Pierre Moreau from comment #119)
> (In reply to Yann Golanski from comment #118)
> > More than a year and still no end in sight… Is the solution to get another
> > card or use the propitiatory driver?
> 
> Have you tried building Ben’s tree (see comment #112) and it didn’t work for
> you? Because the issue should be fixed in the development version of
> Nouveau, and by the looks of it, will land in Linux 4.12.

Sorry for the delay, my BIOS got re-written by Windows (thanks⸮) and it took me
some time to fix it. 

I am happy to wait till 4.12 is released on Fedora but would like to know it
works: several comments pointed to it being flaky…

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-05-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #120 from Hans Petter Jansson  ---
Created attachment 131184
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=131184=edit
nouveau-fdo94990-linux-4.10.patch

I was able to get my GTX 970 working with KMS on Linux 4.10 by cherry-picking a
few of Ben's commits from the master branch onto the linux-4.10 branch (see
patch).

These are also available in the linux-4.10 branch of
https://github.com/hpjansson/nouveau.git for convenience.

With this, I can boot and Plymouth and Xorg work fine, but Wayland still
freezes -- however, I think that's caused by a different issue.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-04-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #119 from Pierre Moreau  ---
(In reply to Yann Golanski from comment #118)
> More than a year and still no end in sight… Is the solution to get another
> card or use the propitiatory driver?

Have you tried building Ben’s tree (see comment #112) and it didn’t work for
you? Because the issue should be fixed in the development version of Nouveau,
and by the looks of it, will land in Linux 4.12.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-04-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #118 from Yann Golanski  ---
More than a year and still no end in sight… Is the solution to get another card
or use the propitiatory driver?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-04-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #117 from Yann Golanski  ---
So I guess this still not fixed. ☹

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-03-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #116 from fariou...@yahoo.fr ---
Hi,

Just to let you know that I'v just tested the patch (remove last 512MB)
Indeed, the kernel can boot (4.10.1 with latest fw) but I'm loosing the screen
while the kernel tries to switch to nouveau.
A hotplug brings back the console (with corrupted top lines)
My setup: 1 DVI screen at 1600x1200 (main), 1 DP 4K screen (black) and 1 HDMI
TV (black too)

If I have some time, I will try to remove all the displays and check for
errors.

One day it will work :) But having an open source driver is really challenging
these days :(

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #115 from Bernie Innocenti  ---
I tested the nouveau module built from https://github.com/skeggsb/nouveau on
top of the latest drm-next kernel and I can confirm that it fixes the black
screen issue on my GTX 970 with 4GB of VRAM.

Ben, would it be possible to extract the relevant patches and backport them
onto recent stable kernels such as 4.9 and 4.10?

Haven't tested Lyude's patch yet.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #114 from Lyude Paul  ---
Created attachment 130094
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=130094=edit
Disable last 512 MiB of VRAM on GTX970

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-03-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #113 from Lyude Paul  ---
Hey, as well even though this is fixed in the development branch I was asked by
one of the other nouveau guys to post this for people running older kernels
since it's easier to backport. This is a very dirty hack that disables the last
512 MB of VRAM for the GTX970, however it does technically fix the issue and
let your GPU run. If you can't use Ben Skegg's patch, give this one a try

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-03-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #112 from Ben Skeggs  ---
If you build the master branch my development tree[1], this issue should be
resolved now.

[1] https://github.com/skeggsb/nouveau - currently builds against drm-next
commit 9ca70356a9260403c1bda40d942935e55d00c11c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-01-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #111 from Yann Golanski  ---
What can we do to help get this bug fixed?…

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-01-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #110 from Wojciech Arabczyk  ---
The most important bug nowadays... At least methinks.

I sold my 970 because of it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-01-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #109 from Salvatore P.  ---
Not only Fedora 25 but everything with a recent kernel do not work on a GTX970
because of this bug.
The installer of Fedora25 do not work.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-01-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #108 from Yann Golanski  ---
Any updates on this bug?… I would like to update to F25 but I cannot because of
this. ☹

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-01-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #107 from fariou...@yahoo.fr ---
Unfortunately I already tried that patch alone, and I was unable to have a
console, only black screen.

And I do not have a serial for the traces, so I didn't investigate furthermore.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2017-01-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

Zach Wolfe  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
   ||g/show_bug.cgi?id=98980

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #105 from fariou...@yahoo.fr ---
Hi,

I'm joining the group of gtx970 4GB owners who have issues with nouveau :)

I've applied 0001-nvkm_gpuobj-size-is-smaller-then-nvkm_gpuobj-size-ca.patch
and now I have at least a console.
However, no x11 with acceleration.

I've check the kernel messages, and besides the tons of traces ("disp:") I see
this line:
:  nvkm_gpuobj_heap_acquire gpuobj->addr 4286832640, gpuobj->size 4096
:  nv50_instobj_size 32768
: nouveau :03:00.0: priv: GPC0: 419df4  (1840820e)
: nouveau :03:00.0: priv: GPC1: 419df4 c000 (1a40820d)
: nouveau :03:00.0: priv: GPC2: 514884 c000 (1c40820e)
: nouveau :03:00.0: priv: GPC3: 51d084 c000 (1f40820e)
: nouveau :03:00.0: gr: init failed, -28


Seems like secboot failed somewhere. Looking at the code, GR failed most likely
when secboot tried to initiate the reset command.

Forgot to say that I'm using kernel 4.9.

If you need me to do some tests, let me know

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-12-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #104 from Bernie Innocenti  ---
With xf86-video-nouveau built from HEAD makes more progress, but ultimately
falls back to software rendering:

[  2962.382] (EE) NOUVEAU(0): Failed to initialise context object: 2D_NVC0 (0)
[  2962.382] (EE) NOUVEAU(0): Error initialising acceleration.  Falling back to
NoAccel

Attaching the full Xorg log and dmesg.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-12-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #103 from Bernie Innocenti  ---
Created attachment 128334
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=128334=edit
dmesg on GTX970 4GB with 4.9.0-rc7 and xf86-video-nouveau from HEAD

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-12-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #102 from Bernie Innocenti  ---
Created attachment 128333
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=128333=edit
Xorg log on GTX970 4GB with 4.9.0-rc7 and xf86-video-nouveau from HEAD

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-12-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #101 from Bernie Innocenti  ---
I tested 0001-nvkm_gpuobj-size-is-smaller-then-nvkm_gpuobj-size-ca.patch with
4.9.0-rc7 and it correctly initializes the console at 3840x2160 @ 30Hz (for
some reason, the 60Hz mode is not detected).

I also tried the patch on top of drm-next (which as of today is still based on
4.9.0-rc5), but all I got a blank screen. This branch has other stability
issues, so it's not necessarily a nouveau regression.

With 4.9.0-rc7, I can start Xorg, but xf86-video-nouveau fails to initialize:

 [   336.771] (II) [drm] nouveau interface version: 1.3.1
 [   336.771] (EE) Unknown chipset: NV124

This is expected, since GM20x acceleration landed after
xf86-video-nouveau-1.0.13. I'll try rebuilding from head and report back.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #100 from Yann Golanski  ---
(In reply to Ilia Mirkin from comment #98)
> To get back to the previous behavior, remove the firmware, or boot
> with nouveau.noaccel=1 nouveau.nofbaccel=1 which should avoid initializing
> the graphics accel engine. (And hopefully avoid secboot as well, but I'm not
> 100% sure.)


Just to be crystal clear: setting the two settings above will boot with X11 (so
I can get a gdm login screen and an Xsession…) but just without any 3D
acceleration?

Would this work around work on Fedora 25?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

Ilia Mirkin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #128179|0   |1
is obsolete||

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

Ilia Mirkin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #126018|0   |1
is obsolete||

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

Ilia Mirkin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #125646|0   |1
is obsolete||

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

Ilia Mirkin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #126042|0   |1
is obsolete||

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

Ilia Mirkin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #125981|0   |1
is obsolete||

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

Ilia Mirkin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #126022|0   |1
is obsolete||

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #99 from Ilia Mirkin  ---
Also, before I go insane, *please* stop replying to these via email. Use
bugzilla directly. Your (Efrem's) email client insists on creating html
attachments which are entered into bugzilla. And you also reply-to-all, so I
get the thing 2x, once via bugzilla, once directly.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #98 from Ilia Mirkin  ---
(In reply to Efrem McCrimon from comment #97)
> Created attachment 128179 [details]
> attachment-14321-0.html
> 
> Hi all:
> 
> Please help me understand the ram issue on the video card, is too many
> buffers created?  I did not have this problem on a 4.6 kernel, now the
> kernel has been upgraded twice, 4.8.5, and now 4.8.6.  No problems using a
> 960 GTX w/4GB DDR5 memory, plus I have a secondary 730 GTw/1GB RAM.

The issue is that the 4GB are laid out "funny" on a GTX 970 (but not other
models), and nouveau doesn't properly handle that.

You had this problem on a 4.6 kernel, as it was the first to provide the
secboot firmware loading functionality (assuming you had the firmware in
place). To get back to the previous behavior, remove the firmware, or boot with
nouveau.noaccel=1 nouveau.nofbaccel=1 which should avoid initializing the
graphics accel engine. (And hopefully avoid secboot as well, but I'm not 100%
sure.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #97 from Efrem McCrimon  ---
Hi all:

Please help me understand the ram issue on the video card, is too many
buffers created?  I did not have this problem on a 4.6 kernel, now the
kernel has been upgraded twice, 4.8.5, and now 4.8.6.  No problems using a
960 GTX w/4GB DDR5 memory, plus I have a secondary 730 GTw/1GB RAM.

Please advice

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:09 PM,  wrote:

> *Comment # 96  on
> bug 94990  from Zach
> Wolfe  *
>
> Could someone point me to how exactly to apply
> "0001-nvkm_gpuobj-size-is-smaller-then-nvkm_gpuobj-size-ca.patch"?
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
>
>- You are the assignee for the bug.
>
>
> ___
> Nouveau mailing list
> Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
>
>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


Re: [Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-24 Thread Efrem Mc
Hi all:

Please help me understand the ram issue on the video card, is too many
buffers created?  I did not have this problem on a 4.6 kernel, now the
kernel has been upgraded twice, 4.8.5, and now 4.8.6.  No problems using a
960 GTX w/4GB DDR5 memory, plus I have a secondary 730 GTw/1GB RAM.

Please advice

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:09 PM,  wrote:

> *Comment # 96  on
> bug 94990  from Zach
> Wolfe  *
>
> Could someone point me to how exactly to apply
> "0001-nvkm_gpuobj-size-is-smaller-then-nvkm_gpuobj-size-ca.patch"?
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
>
>- You are the assignee for the bug.
>
>
> ___
> Nouveau mailing list
> Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
>
>
___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #96 from Zach Wolfe  ---
Could someone point me to how exactly to apply
"0001-nvkm_gpuobj-size-is-smaller-then-nvkm_gpuobj-size-ca.patch"?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #95 from Ben Skeggs  ---
(In reply to Alexandre Courbot from comment #94)
> Created attachment 128093 [details]
> Log with patch 128091
> 
> Hi Ben,
> 
> Patch did not do the trick for me (log attached). Confirmed that
> 0001-nvkm_gpuobj-size-is-smaller-then-nvkm_gpuobj-size-ca.patch still
> succeeded, so apparently the method is not perfectly correct. Rather
> strangely the printk'd value of 0x100ce0 is 0x...

Yeah, everyone, don't bother trying this.  This register is written by the
secure boot ucode, so the problem remains unsolved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #94 from Alexandre Courbot  ---
Created attachment 128093
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=128093=edit
Log with patch 128091

Hi Ben,

Patch did not do the trick for me (log attached). Confirmed that
0001-nvkm_gpuobj-size-is-smaller-then-nvkm_gpuobj-size-ca.patch still
succeeded, so apparently the method is not perfectly correct. Rather strangely
the printk'd value of 0x100ce0 is 0x...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

Ben Skeggs  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Attachment #128090|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #93 from Ben Skeggs  ---
Created attachment 128091
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=128091=edit
untested initial attempt at a solution (take 2)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #92 from Ben Skeggs  ---
Created attachment 128090
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=128090=edit
untested initial attempt at a solution

Can people experiencing this issue please retry with the attached patch, and
provide feedback here.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #91 from Karol Herbst  ---
(In reply to DocMAX from comment #90)
> Is anybody working on this?

yes

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #90 from DocMAX  ---
Is anybody working on this?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #89 from Karol Herbst  ---
(In reply to Gabriel Amadej from comment #88)
> Hi. I've noticed that the liquorix kernel [ https://liquorix.net ] works
> with my GTX970. It worked with version 4.6, 4.7, and now 4.8. I don't know
> what it does differently to make it work, but maybe a solution to the
> problem can be found there.

does your GTX 970 have 4GB or 2GB? The 2GB version should work.
Otherwise, maybe the firmware files are missing so that not all GPU features
are available. Anyway, check with glxinfo if nouveau is actually used

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #88 from Gabriel Amadej  ---
Hi. I've noticed that the liquorix kernel [ https://liquorix.net ] works with
my GTX970. It worked with version 4.6, 4.7, and now 4.8. I don't know what it
does differently to make it work, but maybe a solution to the problem can be
found there.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #87 from Yann Golanski  ---
(In reply to Karol Herbst from comment #86)
> (In reply to Yann Golanski from comment #85)
> > Could we at least have this as a patch for now until a better one comes
> > along. Otherwise us poor folks owning GT970 cannot update to Fedora 25… ☹
> 
> we can't. there would be a less generic patch needed, because it would
> affect a lot of different GPUs as well and mess with the amount of VRAM
> reported.

My bad. I did not understand that. Thank you for the clarification.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #86 from Karol Herbst  ---
(In reply to Yann Golanski from comment #85)
> (In reply to Wojciech Arabczyk from comment #82)
> > Created attachment 127564 [details]
> > dmesg after applying patch to limit bar to 3GB
> > 
> > After applying the patch to limit ram to 3 bars, boots without problems.
> > Blank screen is gone.
> 
> Could we at least have this as a patch for now until a better one comes
> along. Otherwise us poor folks owning GT970 cannot update to Fedora 25… ☹

we can't. there would be a less generic patch needed, because it would affect a
lot of different GPUs as well and mess with the amount of VRAM reported.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-11-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #85 from Yann Golanski  ---
(In reply to Wojciech Arabczyk from comment #82)
> Created attachment 127564 [details]
> dmesg after applying patch to limit bar to 3GB
> 
> After applying the patch to limit ram to 3 bars, boots without problems.
> Blank screen is gone.

Could we at least have this as a patch for now until a better one comes along.
Otherwise us poor folks owning GT970 cannot update to Fedora 25… ☹

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-10-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #82 from Wojciech Arabczyk  ---
Created attachment 127564
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=127564=edit
dmesg after applying patch to limit bar to 3GB

After applying the patch to limit ram to 3 bars, boots without problems. Blank
screen is gone.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-10-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #81 from Wojciech Arabczyk  ---
Created attachment 127563
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=127563=edit
boot log kernel 4.8.4-gentoo

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-10-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #80 from Yann Golanski  ---
(In reply to Zach Wolfe from comment #76)
> Worked on Fedora with later
> kernel versions however so I take it its not strictly a nouveau issue but
> its beyond my capabilities to even find the problem?

Which Fedora and kernel versions did it work on?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-10-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #79 from Karol Herbst  ---
yeah, this would be also the workaround _I_ would suggest, not the other ones
above.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-10-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #78 from Ilia Guterman  ---
Comment on attachment 127508
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=127508
limit ram to 3 bars

Zach Wolfe: one method is to limit the ram usage, but its a bandage not a fix.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-10-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #77 from Ilia Guterman  ---
Created attachment 127508
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=127508=edit
limit ram to 3 bars

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-10-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #76 from Zach Wolfe  ---
Was just curious about this issue myself, on Mint 18 w/ kernel 4.5.4 and my GTX
980 just gives me a black screen as well. Worked on Fedora with later kernel
versions however so I take it its not strictly a nouveau issue but its beyond
my capabilities to even find the problem?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-10-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #75 from Yann Golanski  ---
(In reply to Karol Herbst from comment #74)
> (In reply to Yann Golanski from comment #73)
> > (In reply to Karol Herbst from comment #72)
> > > By the way, this affects the kernel module only.
> > 
> > This still stops my machine from booting or X11 from running if I disable
> > the Nouveau driver. Or am I being dense and missing something?… ☺
> 
> most likely, yes. You should check dmesg in this case and check what is
> happening.

Err… If I disable Nouveau, I get no X11 at all. If I leave it enabled, the
machine does not boot.

Is there a way to boot with a kernel 4.6X and have X11 work via Nouveau?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #74 from Karol Herbst  ---
(In reply to Yann Golanski from comment #73)
> (In reply to Karol Herbst from comment #72)
> > By the way, this affects the kernel module only.
> 
> This still stops my machine from booting or X11 from running if I disable
> the Nouveau driver. Or am I being dense and missing something?… ☺

most likely, yes. You should check dmesg in this case and check what is
happening.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #73 from Yann Golanski  ---
(In reply to Karol Herbst from comment #72)
> By the way, this affects the kernel module only.

This still stops my machine from booting or X11 from running if I disable the
Nouveau driver. Or am I being dense and missing something?… ☺

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #72 from Karol Herbst  ---
(In reply to Yann Golanski from comment #71)
> Is there a chance that this bug will be fixed before Fedora 25 comes out
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/25/Schedule)? It would be really
> irritating to not be able to upgrade because of it.
> 
> Is there anything that we can do to help make this faster?
> 
> I would offer a patch but my X11 driver skills are weak. However, I am happy
> to test a patch if needed.

well, we have an idea how we can fix the issue, but chances are it might break
other cards as well. Anyway, the fix won't be too difficult and a backport
should be fairly simple.

By the way, this affects the kernel module only.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-10-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #71 from Yann Golanski  ---
Is there a chance that this bug will be fixed before Fedora 25 comes out
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/25/Schedule)? It would be really
irritating to not be able to upgrade because of it.

Is there anything that we can do to help make this faster?

I would offer a patch but my X11 driver skills are weak. However, I am happy to
test a patch if needed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-09-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #70 from Yann Golanski  ---
@Ben: definitely neither rushing nor pestering you but is there an ETA for
this?  

Is there anything I can do to help there?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


Re: [Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-08-25 Thread Efrem Mc
Thanks for the comment. Will do.  I uninstalled the non-free driver and
reverted back.  I will report the nouveau version, firmware, and kernel
being used.  I know the kernel is 4.6.5 64bit.

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:22 PM,  wrote:

> Ilia Mirkin  changed bug 94990
> 
> What Removed Added
> CC   pil.smmi...@yandex.com
>
> *Comment # 68  on
> bug 94990  from Ilia
> Mirkin  *
>
> *** Bug 97066  has been 
> marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
>
>- You are the assignee for the bug.
>
>
> ___
> Nouveau mailing list
> Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
>
>
___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-08-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

--- Comment #69 from Efrem McCrimon  ---
Thanks for the comment. Will do.  I uninstalled the non-free driver and
reverted back.  I will report the nouveau version, firmware, and kernel
being used.  I know the kernel is 4.6.5 64bit.

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:22 PM,  wrote:

> Ilia Mirkin  changed bug 94990
> 
> What Removed Added
> CC   pil.smmi...@yandex.com
>
> *Comment # 68  on
> bug 94990  from Ilia
> Mirkin  *
>
> *** Bug 97066  has been 
> marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
>
>- You are the assignee for the bug.
>
>
> ___
> Nouveau mailing list
> Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
>
>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

Ilia Mirkin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pil.smmi...@yandex.com

--- Comment #68 from Ilia Mirkin  ---
*** Bug 97066 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau


[Nouveau] [Bug 94990] [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)

2016-08-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990

Ilia Mirkin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Latest 4.6rc4 kernel, no|[GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM
   |booting on gtx970   |fails at secboot (v4.6+)

--- Comment #67 from Ilia Mirkin  ---
I don't see a way to lock this bug down, unfortunately, but Efram, please
refrain from further comments other than to say "Yes, I have tested the
provided patch and it works" (or doesn't work), once such a patch has been made
available. [It has not yet.] This is not a discussion forum.

There are a few hackpatches available that "work around" this, but they aren't
real solutions. Wait for something from Ben before reporting test results.

Thanks for everyone's patience!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau