Loreno,

you may want to have a look at the following paper:
Naumov et 
al., "The Study of Inter-Vehicle Ad Hoc Networks on Realistic Vehicular 
Traces", MOBIHOC 2006.
It's about 802.11 and vehicular networks, but it 
exploits the RSSI information to estimate the distance between
nodes.

Regards,

Marco

>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
com
>Data: 18-ott-2006 7.58 PM
>A: "Marco Fiore"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: <ns-users@isi.edu>
>Ogg: Re: R: [ns] RSSI measurement
>
>Hi Marco, 
very thanks to your reply!
>
>I will take a look at the structure you 
said and doing some tests. Based in
>what you said, probably this 
solves my problem. A priori I am only
>considering simpler scenarios 
where I do not need to deal with
>interferences. My actual concern is 
only finding a way of estimating the
>distance between two bluetooth 
devices, and I thought RSSI was the
>straingforward solution...
>
>Regards,
>
>Loreno
>
>On 10/18/06, Marco Fiore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>>
>> Loreno,
>>
>> in common/packet-stamp.h you can find the 
PacketStamp
>> structure, which is
>> included in any ns packet. It 
stores information on
>> the transmitted and received
>> power. You can 
access this information
>> with, for example,  p->txInfo_.RxPr,
>> 
which returns the received power
>> of packet p. Note that the original 
implementation
>> of ns does not
>> include interference: if you want 
to add this feature, you can install
>> the patch for wireless support 
you can find at http://www.reti.polito.
>> it/fiore
>>
>> bye,
>>
>> 
Marco
>>
>> >----Messaggio originale----
>> >Da:
>> 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >Data: 18-ott-2006 12.38 AM
>> >A: <ns-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> EDU>
>> >Ogg: [ns] RSSI measurement
>> >
>> >
>> >Hi All,
>> >
>> >does anybody know how
>> do I measure the RSSI between two 
wireless nodes?? As
>> >far as I have
>> seen in the archive, this 
question has been posted during
>> >years in
>> this list without any 
reply. I will be extremelly thankful if
>> >somebody
>> had some hint 
about it.
>> >
>> >Regards,
>> >
>> >Loreno
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>


Reply via email to