Sasan,
don't have a clue on that.
I fear the only way is to analyze
the trace files
by hand to spot the differences. Maybe printing
the
sending times (using an awk script) can
speed up the process.
Let us
know if you can solve the problem.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
Messaggio originale
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data: 19-apr-2006
12.47 PM
A: Marco Fiore[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ie, ns-users@isi.edu
Ogg: Re: R: [ns] which trace format is more
accurate?
Marco,
This is the exact point,
the difference is
about 300 to 400 for 100 sec sim time
I reran the same simulation
and all I did was to change the trace format,
but I see such a
difference in number of sent
$1~/s/ /AGT/ { sent ++; }
any
comments?
both running on the same machine. all the equipment and
environment
settings are the same. you might be able to reproduce it
easily.
Thanks,
Sasan
Sasan,
I see your point.
How
much do differ results you got in the two
cases?
By exact same
simulation you mean that you simply
changed the
trace format and
nothing else (included
the machine you working on)?
Regards,
Marco Fiore
Messaggio originale
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cs.
ucc.ie
Data: 15-apr-2006 9.33 PM
A: Marco Fiore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ns-users@isi.edu
Ogg: Re: R: [ns]
which trace format is more accurate?
Marco,
I agree that I need
separate awk scripts for
different trace formats but
the particular
example that I gave
below is straight forward
$1~/s/ /AGT/ {
sent ++; }
and should return total number of sents message in a
simulation
and that
still returns different values (unless this is not
the
correct way to
calculate the total sent messages)
what do you
think?
Thanks,
Sasan
Sasan,
both versions of
tracefile report the same information.
The
difference only lies
in the format (actually, the
new
trace format is
somehow more
complete).
So they are
accurate in the same way, but the
point
is that you can't
use the same awk script on both!
You have to
write two
versions of you awk script,
and then you'll get the same
results.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
Messaggio
originale
Da:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data: 15-apr-2006 8.06
AM
A: ns-users@ISI.EDU
Ogg:
[ns] which trace format is more
accurate?
Hi All,
I am
generating both trace
formats (old and new) for
the exact same
simulation, and for
instance I count total
number of messages sent as
below (in my awk
file)
$1~/s/ /AGT/ { sent ++; }
but I get
two
different results
now I wonder, which one of the trace files
are
accurate? which one should
I pick? the version is 2.29.
I'll
appreciate your advice.
Thanks,
Sasan
