Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
Fine, I suggest two method we can follow
1- All reply for all.
2- All relpy in perivate and then the person who was asking the question,
gather the replys and forward them as an answer of that question (we will
only have one collected reply).
//may be use a tag in the subject of the reply mail as {ANSWER}.
Thanks in advance
Mariam
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Ahmad arasem...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Fellow NS2ers,
Personally I prefer to see answers for everything as it may be relevent at
some
point.
Anand, you can do what I (and may be many de here), have a special folder
setup
with every email with the Subject NS2 being forwarded to it so your
general
inbox does not get flooded with it. I am glad to know that there are people
answer becuase I posted 2 questions (figured the answer of the first one
though) and didn't get answers and I saw just questions so I thought no one
is
answering here.
but yea I would personally like seeing all answers so everyone has
reference
incase they run into similar issues. I think I saw two more posts sharing
the
same likes.
After all, good luck everyone in your research!
Ahmad
From: Teerawat@UBC teera...@ece.ubc.ca
To: anand waytoan...@gmail.com
Cc: ns-users@ISI.EDU
Sent: Sun, February 20, 2011 9:23:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
Hi,
I answer to people in this group regularly (as much as I can). But usually,
I
just do it to avoid others who have to receive the answers which are
relevant to
their interest.
There is no guideline on the use of this mailing list. If there is one and
it
says that most (if not all) answers should be replied to ALL, I'll be glad
to do
so.
What do you guys think?
Best Wishes
Teerawat Issariyakul
http://www.ns2ultimate.com/
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Teerawat-Issariyakul/358240861417
http://twitter.com/T_Bear
http://www.t-issariyakul.blogspot.com
http://www.ece.ubc.ca/~teerawat
On Feb 21, 2011, at 8:28 AM, anand wrote:
isi is build like this...it is easy to mail al the groupbut they
didn't
considered that one
may take interest in getting the answers of all the questions.
besides if they forward to all then ur inbox will always be filled with
ns-user's mailit will end only u unsubscribeso it's for the best
:)
--
Best regards,
Mariam Ahmed Moustafa
Software Engineer, RD Department
Integrated Solutions For Ports
Tel: +(203) 4293846/4294632 Extn: 207
Email: mka...@isfpegypt.com
Web Site: www.isfpegypt.com
Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
the latter one is much better,
--- On Mon, 2/21/11, Mariam A. Moustafa elansary@gmail.com wrote:
From: Mariam A. Moustafa elansary@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
To: Ahmad arasem...@yahoo.com, ns-users@ISI.EDU
Date: Monday, February 21, 2011, 4:38 AM
Fine, I suggest two method we can follow
1- All reply for all.
2- All relpy in perivate and then the person who was asking the question,
gather the replys and forward them as an answer of that question (we will
only have one collected reply).
//may be use a tag in the subject of the reply mail as {ANSWER}.
Thanks in advance
Mariam
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Ahmad arasem...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Fellow NS2ers,
Personally I prefer to see answers for everything as it may be relevent at
some
point.
Anand, you can do what I (and may be many de here), have a special folder
setup
with every email with the Subject NS2 being forwarded to it so your
general
inbox does not get flooded with it. I am glad to know that there are people
answer becuase I posted 2 questions (figured the answer of the first one
though) and didn't get answers and I saw just questions so I thought no one
is
answering here.
but yea I would personally like seeing all answers so everyone has
reference
incase they run into similar issues. I think I saw two more posts sharing
the
same likes.
After all, good luck everyone in your research!
Ahmad
From: Teerawat@UBC teera...@ece.ubc.ca
To: anand waytoan...@gmail.com
Cc: ns-users@ISI.EDU
Sent: Sun, February 20, 2011 9:23:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
Hi,
I answer to people in this group regularly (as much as I can). But usually,
I
just do it to avoid others who have to receive the answers which are
relevant to
their interest.
There is no guideline on the use of this mailing list. If there is one and
it
says that most (if not all) answers should be replied to ALL, I'll be glad
to do
so.
What do you guys think?
Best Wishes
Teerawat Issariyakul
http://www.ns2ultimate.com/
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Teerawat-Issariyakul/358240861417
http://twitter.com/T_Bear
http://www.t-issariyakul.blogspot.com
http://www.ece.ubc.ca/~teerawat
On Feb 21, 2011, at 8:28 AM, anand wrote:
isi is build like this...it is easy to mail al the groupbut they
didn't
considered that one
may take interest in getting the answers of all the questions.
besides if they forward to all then ur inbox will always be filled with
ns-user's mailit will end only u unsubscribeso it's for the best
:)
--
Best regards,
Mariam Ahmed Moustafa
Software Engineer, RD Department
Integrated Solutions For Ports
Tel: +(203) 4293846/4294632 Extn: 207
Email: mka...@isfpegypt.com
Web Site: www.isfpegypt.com
Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
Hi,
The problem with the latter one (i.e., when a questioner gets the answer,
repost the answer back to the mailing list) is that the person who's got the
answer may not forward the answer back to the mailing list. Even when you have
the rule written say in FAQ, new persons who recently joined the mailing list
might not know about the rule. Then, they would not forward the answer back to
the mailing list.
In my opinion, reply all with a simple tag [ANS:NS] or something like this
might work. People will know that this email message is an answer to a certain
question. Those who do not care about the answer can immediately delete it.
They may event get their mail client to delete mail whose subject contain
[ANS:NS].
But we need to come up with an agreed-upon tag for answering the question.
Note that one drawback of this approach is that there might be too many email
about the reply, which might annoy our members.
Best Wishes,
Teerawat Issariyakul
http://www.ns2ultimate.com/
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Teerawat-Issariyakul/358240861417
http://twitter.com/T_Bear
http://www.t-issariyakul.blogspot.com
http://www.ece.ubc.ca/~teerawat
On Feb 21, 2011, at 7:35 PM, farzin parsa wrote:
the latter one is much better,
--- On Mon, 2/21/11, Mariam A. Moustafa elansary@gmail.com wrote:
From: Mariam A. Moustafa elansary@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
To: Ahmad arasem...@yahoo.com, ns-users@ISI.EDU
Date: Monday, February 21, 2011, 4:38 AM
Fine, I suggest two method we can follow
1- All reply for all.
2- All relpy in perivate and then the person who was asking the question,
gather the replys and forward them as an answer of that question (we will
only have one collected reply).
//may be use a tag in the subject of the reply mail as {ANSWER}.
Thanks in advance
Mariam
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Ahmad arasem...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Fellow NS2ers,
Personally I prefer to see answers for everything as it may be relevent at
some
point.
Anand, you can do what I (and may be many de here), have a special folder
setup
with every email with the Subject NS2 being forwarded to it so your
general
inbox does not get flooded with it. I am glad to know that there are people
answer becuase I posted 2 questions (figured the answer of the first one
though) and didn't get answers and I saw just questions so I thought no one
is
answering here.
but yea I would personally like seeing all answers so everyone has
reference
incase they run into similar issues. I think I saw two more posts sharing
the
same likes.
After all, good luck everyone in your research!
Ahmad
From: Teerawat@UBC teera...@ece.ubc.ca
To: anand waytoan...@gmail.com
Cc: ns-users@ISI.EDU
Sent: Sun, February 20, 2011 9:23:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
Hi,
I answer to people in this group regularly (as much as I can). But usually,
I
just do it to avoid others who have to receive the answers which are
relevant to
their interest.
There is no guideline on the use of this mailing list. If there is one and
it
says that most (if not all) answers should be replied to ALL, I'll be glad
to do
so.
What do you guys think?
Best Wishes
Teerawat Issariyakul
http://www.ns2ultimate.com/
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Teerawat-Issariyakul/358240861417
http://twitter.com/T_Bear
http://www.t-issariyakul.blogspot.com
http://www.ece.ubc.ca/~teerawat
On Feb 21, 2011, at 8:28 AM, anand wrote:
isi is build like this...it is easy to mail al the groupbut they
didn't
considered that one
may take interest in getting the answers of all the questions.
besides if they forward to all then ur inbox will always be filled with
ns-user's mailit will end only u unsubscribeso it's for the best
:)
--
Best regards,
Mariam Ahmed Moustafa
Software Engineer, RD Department
Integrated Solutions For Ports
Tel: +(203) 4293846/4294632 Extn: 207
Email: mka...@isfpegypt.com
Web Site: www.isfpegypt.com
Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
Hi all,
I agree with Teerawat, the replay to all with special tag is more
efficient , However we can define special tag for different questions :
For example I have noted that most of the question is related to the
problem of installation : ns2.29 on ubuntu , on fedora , bad version of
gcc..
I propose to add [ANS:Install:NS] for replay to problem of installation
[ANS:MAC:NS] for mac questions and so on ...
if I am not interested to reply or read to one category I will just have
to delet them easily by creating folder.
Best,
Hadi
Le 2/21/2011 4:59 PM, Teerawat@UBC a écrit :
Hi,
The problem with the latter one (i.e., when a questioner gets the answer,
repost the answer back to the mailing list) is that the person who's got the
answer may not forward the answer back to the mailing list. Even when you
have the rule written say in FAQ, new persons who recently joined the mailing
list might not know about the rule. Then, they would not forward the answer
back to the mailing list.
In my opinion, reply all with a simple tag [ANS:NS] or something like this
might work. People will know that this email message is an answer to a
certain question. Those who do not care about the answer can immediately
delete it. They may event get their mail client to delete mail whose subject
contain [ANS:NS].
But we need to come up with an agreed-upon tag for answering the question.
Note that one drawback of this approach is that there might be too many email
about the reply, which might annoy our members.
Best Wishes,
Teerawat Issariyakul
http://www.ns2ultimate.com/
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Teerawat-Issariyakul/358240861417
http://twitter.com/T_Bear
http://www.t-issariyakul.blogspot.com
http://www.ece.ubc.ca/~teerawat
On Feb 21, 2011, at 7:35 PM, farzin parsa wrote:
the latter one is much better,
--- On Mon, 2/21/11, Mariam A. Moustafaelansary@gmail.com wrote:
From: Mariam A. Moustafaelansary@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
To: Ahmadarasem...@yahoo.com, ns-users@ISI.EDU
Date: Monday, February 21, 2011, 4:38 AM
Fine, I suggest two method we can follow
1- All reply for all.
2- All relpy in perivate and then the person who was asking the question,
gather the replys and forward them as an answer of that question (we will
only have one collected reply).
//may be use a tag in the subject of the reply mail as {ANSWER}.
Thanks in advance
Mariam
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Ahmadarasem...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Fellow NS2ers,
Personally I prefer to see answers for everything as it may be relevent at
some
point.
Anand, you can do what I (and may be many de here), have a special folder
setup
with every email with the Subject NS2 being forwarded to it so your
general
inbox does not get flooded with it. I am glad to know that there are people
answer becuase I posted 2 questions (figured the answer of the first one
though) and didn't get answers and I saw just questions so I thought no one
is
answering here.
but yea I would personally like seeing all answers so everyone has
reference
incase they run into similar issues. I think I saw two more posts sharing
the
same likes.
After all, good luck everyone in your research!
Ahmad
From: Teerawat@UBCteera...@ece.ubc.ca
To: anandwaytoan...@gmail.com
Cc: ns-users@ISI.EDU
Sent: Sun, February 20, 2011 9:23:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
Hi,
I answer to people in this group regularly (as much as I can). But usually,
I
just do it to avoid others who have to receive the answers which are
relevant to
their interest.
There is no guideline on the use of this mailing list. If there is one and
it
says that most (if not all) answers should be replied to ALL, I'll be glad
to do
so.
What do you guys think?
Best Wishes
Teerawat Issariyakul
http://www.ns2ultimate.com/
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Teerawat-Issariyakul/358240861417
http://twitter.com/T_Bear
http://www.t-issariyakul.blogspot.com
http://www.ece.ubc.ca/~teerawat
On Feb 21, 2011, at 8:28 AM, anand wrote:
isi is build like this...it is easy to mail al the groupbut they
didn't
considered that one
may take interest in getting the answers of all the questions.
besides if they forward to all then ur inbox will always be filled with
ns-user's mailit will end only u unsubscribeso it's for the best
:)
--
Best regards,
Mariam Ahmed Moustafa
Software Engineer, RD Department
Integrated Solutions For Ports
Tel: +(203) 4293846/4294632 Extn: 207
Email: mka...@isfpegypt.com
Web Site: www.isfpegypt.com
Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
Hi Hadi,
Thanks for the support. I understand that you'd like to make tag more specific
to fit the readers' need. However, there is a wide variety of question in this
mailing list. For example,
- Installation basic NS2
- Installation of patch (which some people don't even know that they are
patching their NS2. They think that they ran into weird problems.)
- Segmentation fault
- Including new protocols
- No-slot (classifier) errors
- OTcl and C++ linkage (e.g., evalf, resultf,...)
- Protocol specific questions (IEEE 802.11, Energy, routing, etc.)
These are just few examples I've seen over past year. If we assign a tag to
each of the categories above, before long we're gonna have to maintain a long
list of tags.
Now the next problem is that the anwerers will have to remember the exact words
of the tags to conform with the standard we are trying to set here.
Another problem is that with more complicated tag, you cannot ask your mail
client (e.g., mail rules in Apple mail) to automatically delete the mail which
contains a certain tag (e.g., [NS-ANS]).
Anyway, thank you for your thought. I hope we can help each other make this
mailing list a better place.
Best Wishes,
Teerawat Issariyakul
http://www.ns2ultimate.com/
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Teerawat-Issariyakul/358240861417
http://twitter.com/T_Bear
http://www.t-issariyakul.blogspot.com
http://www.ece.ubc.ca/~teerawat
On Feb 21, 2011, at 11:12 PM, El Hadi Cherkaoui wrote:
Hi all,
I agree with Teerawat, the replay to all with special tag is more
efficient , However we can define special tag for different questions :
For example I have noted that most of the question is related to the
problem of installation : ns2.29 on ubuntu , on fedora , bad version of
gcc..
I propose to add [ANS:Install:NS] for replay to problem of installation
[ANS:MAC:NS] for mac questions and so on ...
if I am not interested to reply or read to one category I will just have
to delet them easily by creating folder.
Best,
Hadi
Le 2/21/2011 4:59 PM, Teerawat@UBC a écrit :
Hi,
The problem with the latter one (i.e., when a questioner gets the answer,
repost the answer back to the mailing list) is that the person who's got the
answer may not forward the answer back to the mailing list. Even when you
have the rule written say in FAQ, new persons who recently joined the
mailing list might not know about the rule. Then, they would not forward the
answer back to the mailing list.
In my opinion, reply all with a simple tag [ANS:NS] or something like this
might work. People will know that this email message is an answer to a
certain question. Those who do not care about the answer can immediately
delete it. They may event get their mail client to delete mail whose subject
contain [ANS:NS].
But we need to come up with an agreed-upon tag for answering the question.
Note that one drawback of this approach is that there might be too many
email about the reply, which might annoy our members.
Best Wishes,
Teerawat Issariyakul
http://www.ns2ultimate.com/
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Teerawat-Issariyakul/358240861417
http://twitter.com/T_Bear
http://www.t-issariyakul.blogspot.com
http://www.ece.ubc.ca/~teerawat
On Feb 21, 2011, at 7:35 PM, farzin parsa wrote:
the latter one is much better,
--- On Mon, 2/21/11, Mariam A. Moustafaelansary@gmail.com wrote:
From: Mariam A. Moustafaelansary@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
To: Ahmadarasem...@yahoo.com, ns-users@ISI.EDU
Date: Monday, February 21, 2011, 4:38 AM
Fine, I suggest two method we can follow
1- All reply for all.
2- All relpy in perivate and then the person who was asking the question,
gather the replys and forward them as an answer of that question (we will
only have one collected reply).
//may be use a tag in the subject of the reply mail as {ANSWER}.
Thanks in advance
Mariam
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Ahmadarasem...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Fellow NS2ers,
Personally I prefer to see answers for everything as it may be relevent at
some
point.
Anand, you can do what I (and may be many de here), have a special folder
setup
with every email with the Subject NS2 being forwarded to it so your
general
inbox does not get flooded with it. I am glad to know that there are people
answer becuase I posted 2 questions (figured the answer of the first one
though) and didn't get answers and I saw just questions so I thought no one
is
answering here.
but yea I would personally like seeing all answers so everyone has
reference
incase they run into similar issues. I think I saw two more posts sharing
the
same likes.
After all, good luck everyone in your research!
Ahmad
From: Teerawat@UBCteera...@ece.ubc.ca
To: anandwaytoan...@gmail.com
Cc: ns-users@ISI.EDU
Sent: Sun, February 20, 2011 9:23:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ns
Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
I agree, I think we should go with the first option otherwise I can tell you that it will be not likelky a person will sit down to collect all the answer and send it to the group.. lets face it, laziness plays a factor here. However when a person is answering the question, it is very simple just to use reply all rather than reply so we will definitly get more answers. Making the tags more specific is definitly good idea but I agree with Teerawat, it is not easy task. I like the idea of ANS in the tag it is simple, direct to the point and enable filteration. I gotta tell you, knowing the answer is much better than being flooded with questions with no answers. My thoughts... Lets make it better. I can already see Erico replying all which is Awsome! Some questions were interesting to know the answer for.. this is just my personal experience. Regards, Ahmad From: Teerawat@UBC teera...@ece.ubc.ca To: El Hadi Cherkaoui elhadi.cherka...@gmail.com Cc: ns-users@ISI.EDU Sent: Mon, February 21, 2011 11:37:15 AM Subject: Re: [ns] Why do we have this group? Hi Hadi, Thanks for the support. I understand that you'd like to make tag more specific to fit the readers' need. However, there is a wide variety of question in this mailing list. For example, - Installation basic NS2 - Installation of patch (which some people don't even know that they are patching their NS2. They think that they ran into weird problems.) - Segmentation fault - Including new protocols - No-slot (classifier) errors - OTcl and C++ linkage (e.g., evalf, resultf,...) - Protocol specific questions (IEEE 802.11, Energy, routing, etc.) These are just few examples I've seen over past year. If we assign a tag to each of the categories above, before long we're gonna have to maintain a long list of tags. Now the next problem is that the anwerers will have to remember the exact words of the tags to conform with the standard we are trying to set here. Another problem is that with more complicated tag, you cannot ask your mail client (e.g., mail rules in Apple mail) to automatically delete the mail which contains a certain tag (e.g., [NS-ANS]). Anyway, thank you for your thought. I hope we can help each other make this mailing list a better place. Best Wishes, Teerawat Issariyakul http://www.ns2ultimate.com/ http://www.facebook.com/pages/Teerawat-Issariyakul/358240861417 http://twitter.com/T_Bear http://www.t-issariyakul.blogspot.com http://www.ece.ubc.ca/~teerawat On Feb 21, 2011, at 11:12 PM, El Hadi Cherkaoui wrote: Hi all, I agree with Teerawat, the replay to all with special tag is more efficient , However we can define special tag for different questions : For example I have noted that most of the question is related to the problem of installation : ns2.29 on ubuntu , on fedora , bad version of gcc.. I propose to add [ANS:Install:NS] for replay to problem of installation [ANS:MAC:NS] for mac questions and so on ... if I am not interested to reply or read to one category I will just have to delet them easily by creating folder. Best, Hadi Le 2/21/2011 4:59 PM, Teerawat@UBC a écrit : Hi, The problem with the latter one (i.e., when a questioner gets the answer, repost the answer back to the mailing list) is that the person who's got the answer may not forward the answer back to the mailing list. Even when you have the rule written say in FAQ, new persons who recently joined the mailing list might not know about the rule. Then, they would not forward the answer back to the mailing list. In my opinion, reply all with a simple tag [ANS:NS] or something like this might work. People will know that this email message is an answer to a certain question. Those who do not care about the answer can immediately delete it. They may event get their mail client to delete mail whose subject contain [ANS:NS]. But we need to come up with an agreed-upon tag for answering the question. Note that one drawback of this approach is that there might be too many email about the reply, which might annoy our members. Best Wishes, Teerawat Issariyakul http://www.ns2ultimate.com/ http://www.facebook.com/pages/Teerawat-Issariyakul/358240861417 http://twitter.com/T_Bear http://www.t-issariyakul.blogspot.com http://www.ece.ubc.ca/~teerawat On Feb 21, 2011, at 7:35 PM, farzin parsa wrote: the latter one is much better, --- On Mon, 2/21/11, Mariam A. Moustafaelansary@gmail.com wrote: From: Mariam A. Moustafaelansary@gmail.com Subject: Re: [ns] Why do we have this group? To: Ahmadarasem...@yahoo.com, ns-users@ISI.EDU Date: Monday, February 21, 2011, 4:38 AM Fine, I suggest two method we can follow 1- All reply for all. 2- All relpy in perivate and then the person who was asking the question, gather the replys and forward them as an answer of that question (we will only have one collected reply
[ns] Why do we have this group?
Hi, I am wondering what's the purpose of this newsgroup because all what I can see here is questions and questions but no answer to any (or maybe 10% of the questions). So is there something I am missing here or do you know of a place where people really answer each other? Thanks
Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
Yes, Ahmad I am with you. There were many calls for whom are answering the questions to reply for all not only for who asked!!! We need to raise this call again Thanks On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Ahmad arasem...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I am wondering what's the purpose of this newsgroup because all what I can see here is questions and questions but no answer to any (or maybe 10% of the questions). So is there something I am missing here or do you know of a place where people really answer each other? Thanks -- Best regards, Mariam Ahmed Moustafa Software Engineer, RD Department Integrated Solutions For Ports Tel: +(203) 4293846/4294632 Extn: 207 Email: mka...@isfpegypt.com Web Site: www.isfpegypt.com
Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
When I click to answer a msg, the email wrongly chooses the ones who wrote that msg, instead of the group, because this happens to me also, people answer directly to me instead the group. Is it to complicated to make this mailing list a google group? I think they work better.. Érico V. Porto On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Mariam A. Moustafa elansary@gmail.comwrote: Yes, Ahmad I am with you. There were many calls for whom are answering the questions to reply for all not only for who asked!!! We need to raise this call again Thanks On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Ahmad arasem...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I am wondering what's the purpose of this newsgroup because all what I can see here is questions and questions but no answer to any (or maybe 10% of the questions). So is there something I am missing here or do you know of a place where people really answer each other? Thanks -- Best regards, Mariam Ahmed Moustafa Software Engineer, RD Department Integrated Solutions For Ports Tel: +(203) 4293846/4294632 Extn: 207 Email: mka...@isfpegypt.com Web Site: www.isfpegypt.com
Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
isi is build like this...it is easy to mail al the groupbut they didn't considered that one may take interest in getting the answers of all the questions. besides if they forward to all then ur inbox will always be filled with ns-user's mailit will end only u unsubscribeso it's for the best :)
Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
Hi, I answer to people in this group regularly (as much as I can). But usually, I just do it to avoid others who have to receive the answers which are relevant to their interest. There is no guideline on the use of this mailing list. If there is one and it says that most (if not all) answers should be replied to ALL, I'll be glad to do so. What do you guys think? Best Wishes Teerawat Issariyakul http://www.ns2ultimate.com/ http://www.facebook.com/pages/Teerawat-Issariyakul/358240861417 http://twitter.com/T_Bear http://www.t-issariyakul.blogspot.com http://www.ece.ubc.ca/~teerawat On Feb 21, 2011, at 8:28 AM, anand wrote: isi is build like this...it is easy to mail al the groupbut they didn't considered that one may take interest in getting the answers of all the questions. besides if they forward to all then ur inbox will always be filled with ns-user's mailit will end only u unsubscribeso it's for the best :)
Re: [ns] Why do we have this group?
Hi Fellow NS2ers, Personally I prefer to see answers for everything as it may be relevent at some point. Anand, you can do what I (and may be many de here), have a special folder setup with every email with the Subject NS2 being forwarded to it so your general inbox does not get flooded with it. I am glad to know that there are people answer becuase I posted 2 questions (figured the answer of the first one though) and didn't get answers and I saw just questions so I thought no one is answering here. but yea I would personally like seeing all answers so everyone has reference incase they run into similar issues. I think I saw two more posts sharing the same likes. After all, good luck everyone in your research! Ahmad From: Teerawat@UBC teera...@ece.ubc.ca To: anand waytoan...@gmail.com Cc: ns-users@ISI.EDU Sent: Sun, February 20, 2011 9:23:02 PM Subject: Re: [ns] Why do we have this group? Hi, I answer to people in this group regularly (as much as I can). But usually, I just do it to avoid others who have to receive the answers which are relevant to their interest. There is no guideline on the use of this mailing list. If there is one and it says that most (if not all) answers should be replied to ALL, I'll be glad to do so. What do you guys think? Best Wishes Teerawat Issariyakul http://www.ns2ultimate.com/ http://www.facebook.com/pages/Teerawat-Issariyakul/358240861417 http://twitter.com/T_Bear http://www.t-issariyakul.blogspot.com http://www.ece.ubc.ca/~teerawat On Feb 21, 2011, at 8:28 AM, anand wrote: isi is build like this...it is easy to mail al the groupbut they didn't considered that one may take interest in getting the answers of all the questions. besides if they forward to all then ur inbox will always be filled with ns-user's mailit will end only u unsubscribeso it's for the best :)
