[NSP] Re: Sir Sidney Smith's March - Clough version

2010-10-09 Thread Richard York
   Ooops - said I was too tired. My wife just produced the book,
   Correction!! Gavott ( no "e") and I am sorry, it is the shorter version
   where the last phrase doesn't repeat. Sorry again, I was up far too
   early.
   Best wishes,
   Richard.
   On 08/10/2010 20:35, Pauline Cato wrote:

 It was me who picked this tune for the course - partly because it
 has a few
 nice bits in it which aren't in the NPS Bk1 version and partly
 because of
 that harmony line in bars 5 & 6. I was planning on having a bit of a
 discussion with the group about how closely we should stick to what
 is in
 the manuscript and at what point we decide that something may not be
 working
 musically (even though it is Clough!). Obviously this is rather
 subjective
 Pauline
 - Original Message - From: "Julia Say"
 [1]
 To: [2]
 Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 10:50 AM
 Subject: [NSP] Sir Sidney Smith's March - Clough version

 I have been working on music for the Whitley Bay piping week and
 have discovered an
 anomaly in the above tune in the Clough book, p. 122. (actually,
 there were two in
 the MS but I see I've corrected one in the book.)
 Bar 5, the centre bar of the second pair of staves, has a
 complicated "tuplet" in
 the harmony stave. I have decided this bar is better represented
 (and is possibly
 more playable) by taking the dot off the previous crotchet (a G) and
 splitting the
 tuplet into two pairs of semiquaver triplets ((3Bdg (3dBG). These
 are matched with
 the quaver - 2 semi-quavers of the tune at this point (G2dc for the
 abc literate).
 The other MS error was in the following bar, where the
 demi-semi-quaver pattern at
 the end of the harmony stave was originally written as 4
 semi-quavers with a "4-
 tuplet" marking over them.
 Moral: no matter how famous the writer / composer, always question
 apparent
 illogicalities in anything they write down!
 Hope this helps someone, at least.
 Julia
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:julia@nspipes.co.uk
   2. mailto:nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[NSP] Re: Sir Sidney Smith's March - Clough version

2010-10-09 Thread Richard York
   Subjective indeed... especially when John Clare gives the tune ( I
   believe in its non-abridged version, but I'm sorry, I'm too tired to go
   & check just now) as a Gavotte by Handel.
   :)
   Richard.
   On 08/10/2010 20:35, Pauline Cato wrote:

 It was me who picked this tune for the course - partly because it
 has a few
 nice bits in it which aren't in the NPS Bk1 version and partly
 because of
 that harmony line in bars 5 & 6. I was planning on having a bit of a
 discussion with the group about how closely we should stick to what
 is in
 the manuscript and at what point we decide that something may not be
 working
 musically (even though it is Clough!). Obviously this is rather
 subjective
 Pauline
 - Original Message - From: "Julia Say"
 [1]
 To: [2]
 Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 10:50 AM
 Subject: [NSP] Sir Sidney Smith's March - Clough version

 I have been working on music for the Whitley Bay piping week and
 have discovered an
 anomaly in the above tune in the Clough book, p. 122. (actually,
 there were two in
 the MS but I see I've corrected one in the book.)
 Bar 5, the centre bar of the second pair of staves, has a
 complicated "tuplet" in
 the harmony stave. I have decided this bar is better represented
 (and is possibly
 more playable) by taking the dot off the previous crotchet (a G) and
 splitting the
 tuplet into two pairs of semiquaver triplets ((3Bdg (3dBG). These
 are matched with
 the quaver - 2 semi-quavers of the tune at this point (G2dc for the
 abc literate).
 The other MS error was in the following bar, where the
 demi-semi-quaver pattern at
 the end of the harmony stave was originally written as 4
 semi-quavers with a "4-
 tuplet" marking over them.
 Moral: no matter how famous the writer / composer, always question
 apparent
 illogicalities in anything they write down!
 Hope this helps someone, at least.
 Julia
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:julia@nspipes.co.uk
   2. mailto:nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html