[NSP] Re: [NPS-Discussion] NSP Lists duplication

2011-07-04 Thread Francis Wood
Thanks Julia. A really helpful response.

I'm in favour of your suggestions.

Francis


On 4 Jul 2011, at 14:23, Julia Say wrote:

> On 4 Jul 2011, Francis Wood wrote: 
> 
>> The Dartmouth list is for anyone interested in Northmbrian Small-pipes. 
> 
> It is administered and monitored entirely from without NPS membership. No 
> member or 
> officer of the society has any say in how it is run, although several (only 
> about 
> half) committee members read it and some contribute (obviously).
> Very occasionally Wayne (who does run it) and I consult on whether names are 
> actual 
> people or not, that is all.
> 
>> The NPS
>> Discussion list was subsequently established for Society-specific 
>> discussion. 
>> I remain as a subscriber to the second list because I don't know whether it 
>> still is
>> useful. I have no means of knowing. 
> 
> Tim & I set it up, and do the necessary admin (mostly non-subscribers trying 
> to 
> cross post from Dartmouth) to keep NPS announcements / politics from annoying 
> non-
> members.
> 
> It presently has only 89 subscribers. As a consequence it is of little use to 
> reach 
> most NPS members.
> 
> It was also set up as a "stop-gap" until a discussion forum could be 
> activated on 
> the NPS website, where "political" discussions could be held in separate 
> threads 
> which need not bother those had no interest.
> 
> If (and this is not for me to decide, but "NPS-discussion" subscribers) we 
> have 
> reached the point where it could realistically be suspended, we can do so.
> 
> What I would actually propose (wearing my secretarial hat for a moment) is to 
> convert it to an "NPS-info" list, subscribe all NPS members who have an email 
> address unless they opt out, and use it for Society announcements with the 
> reply 
> function set to come to the sec.only. That is to say, not a discussion list, 
> but an 
> info-list, with discussions pointed to the website forum.
> 
> This would have to be passed by the committee and announced in the NL, since 
> it is 
> a further change, so it isn't going to happen now before the autumn, although 
> we 
> (the 89 subscribers) could all agree that NPS Discussion has passed its 
> use-by 
> date, and agree not to post to it, but rather use the forum.
> 
> Hope this helps
> Julia
> 
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[NSP] Re: [NPS-Discussion] NSP Lists duplication

2011-07-04 Thread Julia Say
On 4 Jul 2011, Francis Wood wrote: 
 
> The Dartmouth list is for anyone interested in Northmbrian Small-pipes. 

It is administered and monitored entirely from without NPS membership. No 
member or 
officer of the society has any say in how it is run, although several (only 
about 
half) committee members read it and some contribute (obviously).
Very occasionally Wayne (who does run it) and I consult on whether names are 
actual 
people or not, that is all.

>The NPS
> Discussion list was subsequently established for Society-specific discussion. 
> I remain as a subscriber to the second list because I don't know whether it 
> still is
> useful. I have no means of knowing. 

Tim & I set it up, and do the necessary admin (mostly non-subscribers trying to 
cross post from Dartmouth) to keep NPS announcements / politics from annoying 
non-
members.

It presently has only 89 subscribers. As a consequence it is of little use to 
reach 
most NPS members.

It was also set up as a "stop-gap" until a discussion forum could be activated 
on 
the NPS website, where "political" discussions could be held in separate 
threads 
which need not bother those had no interest.

If (and this is not for me to decide, but "NPS-discussion" subscribers) we have 
reached the point where it could realistically be suspended, we can do so.

What I would actually propose (wearing my secretarial hat for a moment) is to 
convert it to an "NPS-info" list, subscribe all NPS members who have an email 
address unless they opt out, and use it for Society announcements with the 
reply 
function set to come to the sec.only. That is to say, not a discussion list, 
but an 
info-list, with discussions pointed to the website forum.

This would have to be passed by the committee and announced in the NL, since it 
is 
a further change, so it isn't going to happen now before the autumn, although 
we 
(the 89 subscribers) could all agree that NPS Discussion has passed its use-by 
date, and agree not to post to it, but rather use the forum.

Hope this helps
Julia



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html