[NSP] Re: a key question for NSPipers

2010-12-14 Thread Rick Damon
Great question, John.

I'm sure there are people who get the extra keys because the look cool, but I'd 
hope that you'd not get the bigger chanter until you needed it.  By that I 
mean that you need it to play the music you want to play.

I started out with at 7-key set, and I'm glad I did.  I think you are more 
likely to pay closer attention to the basics that way.  But I kept setting 
aside music that I'd love to play if only I had more keys.  By the time I was 
ready to move to a big chanter I had tunes waiting that called for a lot of 
keys!  I ended up getting a 16-key set, but soon wished I'd gone for 17 keys.  
(I'm missing the low D#, which everyone told me I didn't need.  Many people 
still tell me that, but I know what I want!)  I just recently started working 
on a tune that uses the one key I'd never used, so I'm now vindicated in 
getting this chanter.  When I got it, though, I had immediate buyer's remorse, 
wondering what I'd gotten myself into.

--Rick


On Dec 14, 2010, at 11:58 AM, John Dally wrote:

 When do you qualify to really need more keys?  When I ordered my set
 a number of years ago I was convinced that the desire for 17 keys was
 really too much, so I ordered a thirteen key set instead.  Now I find
 myself reaching for the two missing Bb's and C#'s.  Is there such a
 thing as key-envy?  Is it presumptuous or perhaps a failure of
 imagination to want more keys?  How many keys is enough?  I hear tell
 of twenty five key chanters now.  Is this obsession a pipemaker's
 nightmare?
 cheers,
 John
 
 
 
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





[NSP] Re: a key question for NSPipers

2010-12-14 Thread Anthony Robb

   Hello John
   Like everything else it is a compromise and also depends on what you
   want to play.
   Having said that a point will be reached when increased physical effort
   makes it harder to play sensitively. The first 17 key chanter I ever
   tried was a Clough - Picknell one which had belonged to Tom himself. It
   seemed to have almost half a snooker ball as the end-stop and weigh
   about a kilogram. I can't remember now who it was that let me try it
   but when I said I couldn't understand how Tom played such technically
   demanding music on it, it was explained that he used a 7 key chanter
   for most of his playing. That experience as a player with only a couple
   of years under my belt put me off trying another 17 key chanter until I
   decided to buy one of my own and get stuck in several years later.
   Within a year I had sold it on and bought a fiddle.
   The lack of fluency inherent in the keying makes it an very
   unsatisfying proposition for me. There are a couple of top notch pipers
   out there who consistently eschew the bottom (thumb-thumb) D - F# jumps
   in Bill Charlton's fancy. Often a bottom E is substituted giving a
   thumb-little finger flow. This problem is magnified on a 17 key
   chanter. There are some great pieces out there which demand these keys
   but they are less than 2% of the traditional repertoire (if we take the
   NPS tunes books as our guide).
   The other factor for me is one of tone. For me each added key is rather
   like adding weight to a fiddle tailpiece. An old wooden tailpiece with
   4 heavy string adjusters can still give a pleasing sound but replace it
   with a modern lightweight design with integral adjusters and there is a
   noticeable improvement in, for want of a better phrase, I call the zing
   factor.
   As I say 17 key chanters can still sound great but my 5
   favourite sounding chanters are all 7 key. 2 of them are Reid, the
   others are by Jack Armstrong, Mike Nelson and Philip Gruar. These also
   made 17 key (well at least 16 key) chanters which I've heard
   often but for zingy ring the 7s have it every time.
   In a nutshell the tune possibilities expand with the number of keys but
   the tonal/musical possibilities are greater with fewer keys.
   We pays our money and takes our choice.
   My advice is stick with 13 and get another instrument for other tunes.
   There's a very good chance it will be the instrument for which the tune
   was made in the first place.
   I know this is a very personal (and very unpopular) opinion but I can
   assure people that I am not alone in this.
   Cheers
   Anthony

   John Dally dir...@gmail.com
   Subject: [NSP] a key question for NSPipers
   To: NSP group nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Date: Tuesday, 14 December, 2010, 16:58

   When do you qualify to really need more keys?  When I ordered my set
   a number of years ago I was convinced that the desire for 17 keys was
   really too much, so I ordered a thirteen key set instead.  Now I find
   myself reaching for the two missing Bb's and C#'s.  Is there such a
   thing as key-envy?  Is it presumptuous or perhaps a failure of
   imagination to want more keys?  How many keys is enough?  I hear tell
   of twenty five key chanters now.  Is this obsession a pipemaker's
   nightmare?
   cheers,
   John
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[NSP] Re: a key question for NSPipers

2010-12-14 Thread Anthony Robb

   Hello John
   There might be a bit of confusion here. If you look at your high B key
   you'll see that it is just about at the very top of the chanter. Colin
   Ross managed to squeezee in a top C in place of a high Bb key but to
   get up to highC# would be impossible on the pipes as the hole would
   have to be cut into the reed staple itself. Ouch!!
   When a high C# comes in a tune I play middle C#  and it's not too bad.
   Anthony
   --- On Tue, 14/12/10, John Dally dir...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: John Dally dir...@gmail.com
 Subject: [NSP] Re: a key question for NSPipers
 To: barr...@nspipes.co.uk, nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
 Date: Tuesday, 14 December, 2010, 18:19

   High and low C# are the ones I'm missing, as well as middle and low
   Bbs.  The high C# might be better utilized as a high C.  I'm probably
   exposing a gross ignorance by speculating which keys at the top of the
   chanter would be most useful.
   On 12/14/10, [1]barr...@nspipes.co.uk [2]barr...@nspipes.co.uk wrote:
So, which 13 keys do you have? I can guess the two missing Bb's.
On the other hand, missing two C#'s seems a little strange.
   
Barry
   
   
   
Quoting John Dally [3]dir...@gmail.com:
   
When do you qualify to really need more keys?  When I ordered my
   set
a number of years ago I was convinced that the desire for 17 keys
   was
really too much, so I ordered a thirteen key set instead.  Now I
   find
myself reaching for the two missing Bb's and C#'s.  Is there such
   a
thing as key-envy?  Is it presumptuous or perhaps a failure of
imagination to want more keys?  How many keys is enough?  I hear
   tell
of twenty five key chanters now.  Is this obsession a pipemaker's
nightmare?
cheers,
John
   
   
   
To get on or off this list see list information at
[4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   
   
   
   
   
   --
   Sent from my mobile device

   --

References

   1. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=barr...@nspipes.co.uk
   2. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=barr...@nspipes.co.uk
   3. http://uk.mc5.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=dir...@gmail.com
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[NSP] Re: a key question for NSPipers

2010-12-14 Thread Matt Seattle
 When a high C# comes in a tune I play middle C#  and it's not too
   bad.

   Anthony

   Yes - City of Savannah is the one that first springs to mind, and the
   others I can think of are also not pipe tunes ...

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: a key question for NSPipers

2010-12-14 Thread calecm

Allow me to offer a totally different perspective on how to answer this 
question:

Can you already play all the tunes you want to play with the chanter you have 
now?  Are there no tunes that you've set aside for when you thought you had 
improved to the point where you could actually play them?  Been through all the 
tunes in all the books you have?  

Don't misunderstand me--I thouroughly empathize with key lust.  (I believe 
it's related to tune book lust.)  But if you were asking for were answers to 
your root question, this might help.
   
Alec






-Original Message-
From: John Dally dir...@gmail.com
To: NSP group nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Tue, Dec 14, 2010 9:01 am
Subject: [NSP] a key question for NSPipers


When do you qualify to really need more keys?  When I ordered my set
 number of years ago I was convinced that the desire for 17 keys was
eally too much, so I ordered a thirteen key set instead.  Now I find
yself reaching for the two missing Bb's and C#'s.  Is there such a
hing as key-envy?  Is it presumptuous or perhaps a failure of
magination to want more keys?  How many keys is enough?  I hear tell
f twenty five key chanters now.  Is this obsession a pipemaker's
ightmare?
heers,
ohn

To get on or off this list see list information at
ttp://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


--