Re: [NSWolves] The loss prompted chants of "One Mick McCarthy" from Wolves fans...[sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Agreed. Mick had an almost supernatural ability to polish a turd until it appeared to be a diamond. Shame we never got to sell any of them until people realized they really were turds! Sent from my iPhone On 19/03/2012, at 1:52 PM, Steven Millward wrote: > Putting aside the ability of a manager for the moment, there are a lot of > young players in our side that got picked up from obscurity by Mick, given a > chance, coached to believe they were good enough to play in the Premier > League or even for England and would have felt a massive wrench losing him > from their lives. Morgan's outburst in the dressing room and subsequent > treatment of Mick can have only hurt their confidence. > > > > On 19 March 2012 13:45, mark worrall wrote: > Have faith Lee. I still think we're better than Blackburn + Wigan. Problem is > its hard to confidently mention a 3rd we're better than :-( > > Did you get tickets for Aust v Japan WC Qualifier here in June ? :-) > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Morris, Lee SGT > wrote: > UNCLASSIFIED > > That all makes sense...except for the last line. > > > > IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and > is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you > have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender > and delete the email. > > From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of mark worrall > Sent: Monday, 19 March 2012 12:34 > To: nswolves@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] The loss prompted chants of "One Mick McCarthy" from > Wolves fans... > > You're quite right about it being a resort. At times it looked like some of > our lot were on holiday. > > The only difference I can see with TC is that the players arent fighting as > hard, or for as long, as they seemed to under MM. > > TC loans Hammil out and insists on bringing Kightley on who just gives the > ball away nearly every time he gets it. Should be the other way around. > > Im hearing Guodie is being raved about at Notts Forest as their best player, > and they want to buy him. whyTF hasnt he been recalled ? > > Its starting to look like Stearman is TCs love child, not MMs. Craddock or > Johnson would be a better partner for Bassong at the back. > > And yeah, we were always going to get stuffed by ManUre. Im getting a bit > over these wild rally calls from the players every week before the match. > > Still believe we wont go down though. > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Marcus Chantry > wrote: > I'm not sure the result would have been any different with Mick in charge. TC > is a McCarthy replica and unfortunately has to make do with the same players > that Mick, and himself presumably, identified as being of premier league > standard. > > I've got no qualms with the resort. Man Utd have put 5 or more past better > teams thanks us eg Arsenal. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 19/03/2012, at 12:21 PM, mark worrall wrote: > >> http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17422980 >> >> Hope all those who called for his sacking are suitably satisfied with the >> consequences. >> >> -- >> Boo! Curbishley out! > > -- > Boo! Curbishley out! > > -- > Boo! Curbishley out! > -- > Boo! Curbishley out! > > -- > Boo! Curbishley out! > > -- > Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
Re: [NSWolves] The loss prompted chants of "One Mick McCarthy" from Wolves fans...[sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Putting aside the ability of a manager for the moment, there are a lot of young players in our side that got picked up from obscurity by Mick, given a chance, coached to believe they were good enough to play in the Premier League or even for England and would have felt a massive wrench losing him from their lives. Morgan's outburst in the dressing room and subsequent treatment of Mick can have only hurt their confidence. On 19 March 2012 13:45, mark worrall wrote: > Have faith Lee. I still think we're better than Blackburn + Wigan. Problem > is its hard to confidently mention a 3rd we're better than :-( > > Did you get tickets for Aust v Japan WC Qualifier here in June ? :-) > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Morris, Lee SGT < > lee.mor...@defence.gov.au> wrote: > >> ** >> >> *UNCLASSIFIED* >> That all makes sense...except for the last line. >> >> >> >> *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of >> Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act >> 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to >> contact the sender and delete the email. >> -- >> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On >> Behalf Of *mark worrall >> *Sent:* Monday, 19 March 2012 12:34 >> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com >> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] The loss prompted chants of "One Mick >> McCarthy" from Wolves fans... >> >> You're quite right about it being a resort. At times it looked like some >> of our lot were on holiday. >> >> The only difference I can see with TC is that the players arent fighting >> as hard, or for as long, as they seemed to under MM. >> >> TC loans Hammil out and insists on bringing Kightley on who just gives >> the ball away nearly every time he gets it. Should be the other way around. >> >> Im hearing Guodie is being raved about at Notts Forest as their best >> player, and they want to buy him. whyTF hasnt he been recalled ? >> >> Its starting to look like Stearman is TCs love child, not MMs. Craddock >> or Johnson would be a better partner for Bassong at the back. >> >> And yeah, we were always going to get stuffed by ManUre. Im getting a bit >> over these wild rally calls from the players every week before the match. >> >> Still believe we wont go down though. >> >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Marcus Chantry >> wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure the result would have been any different with Mick in >>> charge. TC is a McCarthy replica and unfortunately has to make do with the >>> same players that Mick, and himself presumably, identified as being of >>> premier league standard. >>> >>> I've got no qualms with the resort. Man Utd have put 5 or more past >>> better teams thanks us eg Arsenal. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 19/03/2012, at 12:21 PM, mark worrall wrote: >>> >>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17422980 >>> >>> Hope all those who called for his sacking are suitably satisfied with >>> the consequences. >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Curbishley out! >>> >>> -- >>> Boo! Curbishley out! >>> >> >> -- >> Boo! Curbishley out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Curbishley out! >> > > -- > Boo! Curbishley out! > -- Boo! Curbishley out!
RE: [NSWolves] The loss prompted chants of "One Mick McCarthy" from Wolves fans...[sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Notlob and we're not far off qpr From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Monday, 19 March 2012 1:46 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] The loss prompted chants of "One Mick McCarthy" from Wolves fans...[sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Have faith Lee. I still think we're better than Blackburn + Wigan. Problem is its hard to confidently mention a 3rd we're better than :-( Did you get tickets for Aust v Japan WC Qualifier here in June ? :-) On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Morris, Lee SGT wrote: UNCLASSIFIED That all makes sense...except for the last line. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Monday, 19 March 2012 12:34 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] The loss prompted chants of "One Mick McCarthy" from Wolves fans... You're quite right about it being a resort. At times it looked like some of our lot were on holiday. The only difference I can see with TC is that the players arent fighting as hard, or for as long, as they seemed to under MM. TC loans Hammil out and insists on bringing Kightley on who just gives the ball away nearly every time he gets it. Should be the other way around. Im hearing Guodie is being raved about at Notts Forest as their best player, and they want to buy him. whyTF hasnt he been recalled ? Its starting to look like Stearman is TCs love child, not MMs. Craddock or Johnson would be a better partner for Bassong at the back. And yeah, we were always going to get stuffed by ManUre. Im getting a bit over these wild rally calls from the players every week before the match. Still believe we wont go down though. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I'm not sure the result would have been any different with Mick in charge. TC is a McCarthy replica and unfortunately has to make do with the same players that Mick, and himself presumably, identified as being of premier league standard. I've got no qualms with the resort. Man Utd have put 5 or more past better teams thanks us eg Arsenal. Sent from my iPhone On 19/03/2012, at 12:21 PM, mark worrall wrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17422980 Hope all those who called for his sacking are suitably satisfied with the consequences. -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
Re: [NSWolves] The loss prompted chants of "One Mick McCarthy" from Wolves fans...[sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Have faith Lee. I still think we're better than Blackburn + Wigan. Problem is its hard to confidently mention a 3rd we're better than :-( Did you get tickets for Aust v Japan WC Qualifier here in June ? :-) On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Morris, Lee SGT wrote: > ** > > *UNCLASSIFIED* > That all makes sense...except for the last line. > > > > *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence > and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If > you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the > sender and delete the email. > -- > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *mark worrall > *Sent:* Monday, 19 March 2012 12:34 > *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] The loss prompted chants of "One Mick McCarthy" > from Wolves fans... > > You're quite right about it being a resort. At times it looked like some > of our lot were on holiday. > > The only difference I can see with TC is that the players arent fighting > as hard, or for as long, as they seemed to under MM. > > TC loans Hammil out and insists on bringing Kightley on who just gives the > ball away nearly every time he gets it. Should be the other way around. > > Im hearing Guodie is being raved about at Notts Forest as their best > player, and they want to buy him. whyTF hasnt he been recalled ? > > Its starting to look like Stearman is TCs love child, not MMs. Craddock or > Johnson would be a better partner for Bassong at the back. > > And yeah, we were always going to get stuffed by ManUre. Im getting a bit > over these wild rally calls from the players every week before the match. > > Still believe we wont go down though. > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Marcus Chantry wrote: > >> I'm not sure the result would have been any different with Mick in >> charge. TC is a McCarthy replica and unfortunately has to make do with the >> same players that Mick, and himself presumably, identified as being of >> premier league standard. >> >> I've got no qualms with the resort. Man Utd have put 5 or more past >> better teams thanks us eg Arsenal. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 19/03/2012, at 12:21 PM, mark worrall wrote: >> >> http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17422980 >> >> Hope all those who called for his sacking are suitably satisfied with >> the consequences. >> >> -- >> Boo! Curbishley out! >> >> -- >> Boo! Curbishley out! >> > > -- > Boo! Curbishley out! > > -- > Boo! Curbishley out! > -- Boo! Curbishley out!
RE: [NSWolves] The loss prompted chants of "One Mick McCarthy" from Wolves fans...[sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED That all makes sense...except for the last line. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of mark worrall Sent: Monday, 19 March 2012 12:34 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] The loss prompted chants of "One Mick McCarthy" from Wolves fans... You're quite right about it being a resort. At times it looked like some of our lot were on holiday. The only difference I can see with TC is that the players arent fighting as hard, or for as long, as they seemed to under MM. TC loans Hammil out and insists on bringing Kightley on who just gives the ball away nearly every time he gets it. Should be the other way around. Im hearing Guodie is being raved about at Notts Forest as their best player, and they want to buy him. whyTF hasnt he been recalled ? Its starting to look like Stearman is TCs love child, not MMs. Craddock or Johnson would be a better partner for Bassong at the back. And yeah, we were always going to get stuffed by ManUre. Im getting a bit over these wild rally calls from the players every week before the match. Still believe we wont go down though. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I'm not sure the result would have been any different with Mick in charge. TC is a McCarthy replica and unfortunately has to make do with the same players that Mick, and himself presumably, identified as being of premier league standard. I've got no qualms with the resort. Man Utd have put 5 or more past better teams thanks us eg Arsenal. Sent from my iPhone On 19/03/2012, at 12:21 PM, mark worrall wrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17422980 Hope all those who called for his sacking are suitably satisfied with the consequences. -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
