[NTG-context] uncompatibility?
Hi all! I've installed TeX based on tl8 which is used paralely with based on tl7. Attached ZIP contains TeX code and two outputs with logs; tl7 and 8, which are quite different... There are some warnings in newer one (about doubled map entries) but shouldn't play a role here. Thanks for any hints! Regards, Pawe/l test.zip Description: Binary data
[NTG-context] Re: uncompatibility?
Hi, are quite different... There are some warnings in newer one (about doubled map entries) but shouldn't play a role here. Thanks for any hints! right. You might want to clean up the map files, but that is not important. tl7: ConTeXt ver: 2002.5.24 fmt: 2003.10.6 int: english mes: english tl8: ConTeXt ver: 2003.10.5 fmt: 2003.10.10 int: english mes: english Patrick -- next attempt, please ;-) ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Re: uncompatibility?
At 11:09 11/10/2003, you wrote: Hi, are quite different... There are some warnings in newer one (about doubled map entries) but shouldn't play a role here. Thanks for any hints! right. You might want to clean up the map files, but that is not important. tl7: ConTeXt ver: 2002.5.24 fmt: 2003.10.6 int: english mes: english tl8: ConTeXt ver: 2003.10.5 fmt: 2003.10.10 int: english mes: english actually, cleaning up really matters! I have my own alternative map files without the Internal Font Names since that will mess up pdf inclusion of fonts with similar names but different instances (slanted etc) Hans ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Re: uncompatibility?
From: Pawel Jackowski na Onet [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 9:29 AM At 11:09 11/10/2003, you wrote: Hi, are quite different... There are some warnings in newer one (about doubled map entries) but shouldn't play a role here. Thanks for any hints! From: Patrick Gundlach [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 11:09 AM right. You might want to clean up the map files, but that is not important. tl7: ConTeXt ver: 2002.5.24 fmt: 2003.10.6 int: english mes: english tl8: ConTeXt ver: 2003.10.5 fmt: 2003.10.10 int: english mes: english Ok, the difference is about 17 months in ConTeXt version, while formats are quite fresh... Can't see the clue :-? From: Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 11:34 AM actually, cleaning up really matters! I have my own alternative map files without the Internal Font Names since that will mess up pdf inclusion of fonts with similar names but different instances (slanted etc) I admit that maps in my tl8 installation aren't cleaned up already; I have to spend some time to make it in the way that suits me best. But the problem I sent doesn't look to be font-dependent. Every characters are found at this moment, so I put the problem off. Lets consider the following code: \setupitemize[4,packed] \starttext \startitemize[n] \item one \item two \item three \stopitemize \stoptext The problem is that in newer installation, default itemize style (meaning packed, with triangle symbol) IS FORCED instead of style given direclty (just numbering). The older one do what I would expect; numbered style has a priority. So after running tl8 I get three items with triangles, but after running tl7 I get three numbered items. Why it is so? Has anything been changed in itemizing mechanism? I will accept all changes with pleasure, but the point is to understand what is going on :-D Thanks, Pawe/l ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] itemize: before/after only with columns?
It seems to me that the 'before' and 'after' keywords used in the third
argument of \setupitemize are operative only if 'columns' are also
specified. In the example below, the hairlines disappear if the 'columns'
keyword is eliminated.
Feature or bug?
BTW: can the lengths of the two hairlines in this example be made to be
the same length? What's causing the indentation of the first hairline?
Regards,
Gary
-
\setupitemize[2][a,packed,columns][before={\hairline},after={\hairline}]
\setupitemize[1][n]
\starttext
\startitemize
%
\item Level One
%
\startitemize
\item first
\item second
\item third
\stopitemize
%
\item Forgot a level
%
\startitemize
\item one
\item two
\item three
\stopitemize
%
\item Level two
%
\startitemize
\item here's one
\item here's another
\item finally this
\stopitemize
%
\stopitemize
%
\stoptext
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
