Re: [NTG-context] \Word broken
Matthias Wächter wrote: > On 8/5/2008 6:48 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: >> Matthias Wächter wrote: >>> On 8/5/2008 6:37 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Matthias Wächter wrote: > Do you know how this can be fixed? Is the descripion descriptive enough? will be fixed in the next release (tomorrow we plan to do a formal release) >>> Thanks! I am looking forward to the change as I am curious what’s the >>> proper way of doing it. >> you mean in lua code? > > Yeah. While I survived a journey into changing some ConTeXt (MKII) > functionality recently and found everything clear (texbook is your friend), I > am really puzzled about attribute handling in Lua. But it’s just a couple of > lines I have investigated, maybe I’ll be a wizz as soon I roll things up from > bottom to top … ;-) attributes are just a property of nodes, and characters in the input become nodes in this case there is a specific attribute for casing with a value that tells to do Words the tricky thing here is that when i process Word, i need to erase following casing attributes at some time in the future, context mkiv will provide a mechanism for user attributes (attribute processing can take place at several moments by intercepting the node list) Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \Word broken
On 8/5/2008 6:48 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > Matthias Wächter wrote: >> On 8/5/2008 6:37 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> Matthias Wächter wrote: >>> Do you know how this can be fixed? Is the descripion descriptive enough? >>> will be fixed in the next release (tomorrow we plan to do a formal release) >> Thanks! I am looking forward to the change as I am curious what’s the proper >> way of doing it. > > you mean in lua code? Yeah. While I survived a journey into changing some ConTeXt (MKII) functionality recently and found everything clear (texbook is your friend), I am really puzzled about attribute handling in Lua. But it’s just a couple of lines I have investigated, maybe I’ll be a wizz as soon I roll things up from bottom to top … ;-) - Matthias ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \Word broken
Matthias Wächter wrote: > On 8/5/2008 6:37 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: >> Matthias Wächter wrote: >> >>> Do you know how this can be fixed? Is the descripion descriptive enough? >> will be fixed in the next release (tomorrow we plan to do a formal release) > > Thanks! I am looking forward to the change as I am curious what’s the proper > way of doing it. you mean in lua code? Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \Word broken
On 8/5/2008 6:37 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > Matthias Wächter wrote: > >> Do you know how this can be fixed? Is the descripion descriptive enough? > > will be fixed in the next release (tomorrow we plan to do a formal release) Thanks! I am looking forward to the change as I am curious what’s the proper way of doing it. Keep up the good work, - Matthias ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \Word broken
Matthias Wächter wrote: > Do you know how this can be fixed? Is the descripion descriptive enough? will be fixed in the next release (tomorrow we plan to do a formal release) Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \Word broken
Hans,
Do you know how this can be fixed? Is the descripion descriptive enough?
Thanks,
- Matthias
On 7/30/2008 10:23 AM, Matthias Wächter wrote:
> On 7/29/2008 11:22 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> Matthias Wächter wrote:
>>
>>> Hans, do you feel something about the issue?
>> only if i get a test file and a description of expected behaviour
>
> Sure, here it is. removing the comment on the \word version works only in
> MKIV, i.e. LuaTeX, but that’s not the issue anyway.
>
> \starttext
>
> assert \WORDS{oNe two} = ONE TWO (works in MKII + MKIV)
>
> %% \word is not defined in MKII, just in MKIV
> % assert \word{oNe two} = one two (works in MKIV)
>
> assert \Words{oNe two} = ONe Two (works in MKII + MKIV)
>
> assert \Word{oNe two} = ONe two (works in MKII, does not work in MKIV)
>
> \stoptext
>
>
> Thanks for taking care, Hans,
> - Matthias
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \Word broken
On 7/29/2008 11:22 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Matthias Wächter wrote:
>
>> Hans, do you feel something about the issue?
>
> only if i get a test file and a description of expected behaviour
Sure, here it is. removing the comment on the \word version works only in MKIV,
i.e. LuaTeX, but that’s not the issue anyway.
\starttext
assert \WORDS{oNe two} = ONE TWO (works in MKII + MKIV)
%% \word is not defined in MKII, just in MKIV
% assert \word{oNe two} = one two (works in MKIV)
assert \Words{oNe two} = ONe Two (works in MKII + MKIV)
assert \Word{oNe two} = ONe two (works in MKII, does not work in MKIV)
\stoptext
Thanks for taking care, Hans,
- Matthias
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \Word broken
Matthias Wächter wrote: > Hans, do you feel something about the issue? only if i get a test file and a description of expected behaviour Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] \Word broken
On 7/25/2008 11:30 AM, Matthias Wächter wrote:
> On 7/24/2008 9:49 PM, Peter Münster wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 24 2008, Matthias Wächter wrote:
>>> What am I doing wrong? \Word, \Words and \WORDS cannot be applied to
>>> synonyms, they are displayed unmodified which is a pity as these words
>>> should be capitalized at the beginning of a sentence. Is there a
>>> solution?
>> Try "texexec --luatex file" (luatex has to be installed).
>
> Wow, it's always impressive to see what difference luatex makes … :-)
>
> Only problem: \Word does the same as \Words (checked on live.contextgarden).
> Any hints?
This is the respective code from core-spa.mkiv, and it is obviously broken as
it defines \Words to be the same as \Word (and it defines \Word wrongly in the
first place).
[…]
\def\WORD{\groupedcommand{\setcharactercasing[\plusone ]}{}}
\def\word{\groupedcommand{\setcharactercasing[\plustwo ]}{}}
\def\Word{\groupedcommand{\setcharactercasing[\plusthree]}{}} % \plusfour
\let\WORDS\WORD
\let\words\word
\let\Words\Word
[…]
I just played a little bit with the lua code but get lost miserably considering
all those nodes, linked lists etc.
It seems to be the hard part to skip the remaining words properly, so its
implementation was postponed. Is this correct?
Hans, do you feel something about the issue?
Thanks,
- Matthias
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
