Re: [NTG-context] \autoinsertnextspace regression / discrepancy, mkiv to lmtx
On 10/26/2022 3:35 PM, Rik Kabel via ntg-context wrote:
On 2022-10-26 07:43, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
On 10/26/2022 1:52 AM, Rik Kabel via ntg-context wrote:
The following example produces different results when processed by
LMTX and MkIV. In particular, a space between the X and Y is not
auto-inserted by LMTX, while it is by MkIV.
\starttexdefinition TEST #1
#1\autoinsertnextspace
\stoptexdefinition
\tt
\starttext
\TEST{X} \emph{Y}
\stoptext
The MkIV result is the correct result (in my opinion).
more a side effect ... we lookahead and \emph is not some character
I made a variants that does abetter job on that
\starttexdefinition TEST #1
#1%
\autoinsertedspace % subtle name change
\stoptexdefinition
but you have to wait till we update,
Hans
Thank you in advance for the upcoming fix.
Can you tell us (me) why you chose to create a new macro,
\autoinsertedspace, instead of changing the code for
\autoinsertnextspace in LMTX? Do you see a circumstance under which the
current LMTX behavior of \autoinsertnextspace is desirable or required?
compatibility .. it also uses a different mechanism for which that name
suits better
Will the new macro be available under MkIV?
I suppose I can do that if needed,
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \autoinsertnextspace regression / discrepancy, mkiv to lmtx
On 2022-10-26 07:43, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
On 10/26/2022 1:52 AM, Rik Kabel via ntg-context wrote:
The following example produces different results when processed by
LMTX and MkIV. In particular, a space between the X and Y is not
auto-inserted by LMTX, while it is by MkIV.
\starttexdefinition TEST #1
#1\autoinsertnextspace
\stoptexdefinition
\tt
\starttext
\TEST{X} \emph{Y}
\stoptext
The MkIV result is the correct result (in my opinion).
more a side effect ... we lookahead and \emph is not some character
I made a variants that does abetter job on that
\starttexdefinition TEST #1
#1%
\autoinsertedspace % subtle name change
\stoptexdefinition
but you have to wait till we update,
Hans
Thank you in advance for the upcoming fix.
Can you tell us (me) why you chose to create a new macro,
\autoinsertedspace, instead of changing the code for
\autoinsertnextspace in LMTX? Do you see a circumstance under which the
current LMTX behavior of \autoinsertnextspace is desirable or required?
Will the new macro be available under MkIV?
--
Rik
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \autoinsertnextspace regression / discrepancy, mkiv to lmtx
On 10/26/2022 1:52 AM, Rik Kabel via ntg-context wrote:
The following example produces different results when processed by LMTX
and MkIV. In particular, a space between the X and Y is not
auto-inserted by LMTX, while it is by MkIV.
\starttexdefinition TEST #1
#1\autoinsertnextspace
\stoptexdefinition
\tt
\starttext
\TEST{X} \emph{Y}
\stoptext
The MkIV result is the correct result (in my opinion).
more a side effect ... we lookahead and \emph is not some character
I made a variants that does abetter job on that
\starttexdefinition TEST #1
#1%
\autoinsertedspace % subtle name change
\stoptexdefinition
but you have to wait till we update,
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] \autoinsertnextspace regression / discrepancy, mkiv to lmtx
The following example produces different results when processed by LMTX
and MkIV. In particular, a space between the X and Y is not
auto-inserted by LMTX, while it is by MkIV.
\starttexdefinition TEST #1
#1\autoinsertnextspace
\stoptexdefinition
\tt
\starttext
\TEST{X} \emph{Y}
\stoptext
The MkIV result is the correct result (in my opinion).
--
Rik
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___
