Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 10:24:01PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 12:52:38PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Schopper wrote:
Hi,
are the delimiters \lgroup and \rgroup supported in MkIV?
This
\starttext
$$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$
\stoptext
is ok in MkII (ConTeXt ver: 2011.01.06) but when compiled with
MkIV (ConTeXt ver: 2010.07.30 11:35 and ver: 2010.07.30 11:35) the
delimiters are not shown. (By the way, the same holds true for
\rmoustache and \lmoustache.)
Am I missing something?
No. The math mappings of virtual fonts are incomplete. The symbols
should work correctly with unicode math fonts like cambria, asana,
and xits. But, it appears that lgroup and rgroup are missing from
xits (Khaled?)
There are, but context is looking for the wring character; it is looking
for U+3014 (which I think is a CJK bracket and does not look like
\lgroup either) while it should be looking for U+27EE (whose Unicode
annotation precisely says lgroup):
\setupbodyfont[xits]
\starttext
$$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$
\def\lgroup{\Udelimiter 4 0 27EE}
\def\rgroup{\Udelimiter 4 0 27EF}
$$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$
\stoptext
It was not extensible though, the version in git now grow, but starts
with a relatively large size, check and tell me if it should be smaller.
Looks OK to me, but I am not really an expert on the shapes of the
symbols. Can you also make lmoustache and rmoustache extensible?
Should be now.
Regards,
Khaled
--
Khaled Hosny
Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team
Free font developer
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
Just tried the new beta, works perfectly!
Thank you very very much!
Am 09.01.11 04:24, schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 12:52:38PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Schopper wrote:
Hi,
are the delimiters \lgroup and \rgroup supported in MkIV?
This
\starttext
$$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$
\stoptext
is ok in MkII (ConTeXt ver: 2011.01.06) but when compiled with
MkIV (ConTeXt ver: 2010.07.30 11:35 and ver: 2010.07.30 11:35) the
delimiters are not shown. (By the way, the same holds true for
\rmoustache and \lmoustache.)
Am I missing something?
No. The math mappings of virtual fonts are incomplete. The symbols
should work correctly with unicode math fonts like cambria, asana,
and xits. But, it appears that lgroup and rgroup are missing from
xits (Khaled?)
There are, but context is looking for the wring character; it is looking
for U+3014 (which I think is a CJK bracket and does not look like
\lgroup either) while it should be looking for U+27EE (whose Unicode
annotation precisely says lgroup):
\setupbodyfont[xits]
\starttext
$$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$
\def\lgroup{\Udelimiter 4 0 27EE}
\def\rgroup{\Udelimiter 4 0 27EF}
$$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$
\stoptext
It was not extensible though, the version in git now grow, but starts
with a relatively large size, check and tell me if it should be smaller.
Looks OK to me, but I am not really an expert on the shapes of the
symbols. Can you also make lmoustache and rmoustache extensible?
Hans, I am attaching the patch for char-def.lua that corrects the
location of lgroup and rgroup. I still do not know how to fix this for
lm virtual math font.
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 01:13:25AM +, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: That was the same range that I had looked at, but somehow that pdf did not have 27EC-27EF. Neither does char-def.lua. So, I guess that these are newer additions. It's been introduced in Unicode 5.1 in March 2008. Unicode is an evolving standard, you know. That is why I asked Hans while ago how char-def.lua was generated, from what version of Unicode and whether it is updated/updatable or not; I was worried that it will soon be outdated, which seems to be the case now. Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 08:29:17PM +, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: There are, but context is looking for the wring character; it is looking for U+3014 (which I think is a CJK bracket Indeed. It's one of the angle brackets that one finds in many CJK fonts. while it should be looking for U+27EE (whose Unicode annotation precisely says lgroup): Note that those annatations in the code charts are actually the Unicode 1.0 names of the characters, where they differ from the Unicode 1.1 names (when Unicode was unified with ISO 10646 and adopted some of its names). They should not, in general, be understood as the name of this character is some other standard, for example. But they are of course a good hint of what the character represents. I usually look for long description, it can sometimes be very helpful on what is the intended use of the characters (names are not very accurate, especially early characters which are often misnamed). Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011, Khaled Hosny wrote: On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 01:13:25AM +, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: That was the same range that I had looked at, but somehow that pdf did not have 27EC-27EF. Neither does char-def.lua. So, I guess that these are newer additions. It's been introduced in Unicode 5.1 in March 2008. Unicode is an evolving standard, you know. That is why I asked Hans while ago how char-def.lua was generated, from what version of Unicode and whether it is updated/updatable or not; I don't know how it was generated. Mojca and I occasionally update the file by adding the names of math symbols. If the latest unicode symbol list is available in text format, it should not be too difficult to check if the table in char-def has any missing entries. I was worried that it will soon be outdated, which seems to be the case now. In this case, I just added these four missing characters by hand. Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 19:59, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Sun, 9 Jan 2011, Khaled Hosny wrote: That is why I asked Hans while ago how char-def.lua was generated, from what version of Unicode and whether it is updated/updatable or not; I don't know how it was generated. Mojca and I occasionally update the file by adding the names of math symbols. If the latest unicode symbol list is available in text format, it should not be too difficult to check if the table in char-def has any missing entries. From what I know it has been auto-generated the first time. Unless I'm mistaken Hans never used any automatic procedure to add the new glyphs from newer Unicode standards. It is definitely updatable, but not necessary regularly updated :) :) :) The code that generated the list cannot be used without modifications since there have been many manual changes on the old list, but it is definitely doable. Mojca ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 01:59:20PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Sun, 9 Jan 2011, Khaled Hosny wrote: On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 01:13:25AM +, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: That was the same range that I had looked at, but somehow that pdf did not have 27EC-27EF. Neither does char-def.lua. So, I guess that these are newer additions. It's been introduced in Unicode 5.1 in March 2008. Unicode is an evolving standard, you know. That is why I asked Hans while ago how char-def.lua was generated, from what version of Unicode and whether it is updated/updatable or not; I don't know how it was generated. Mojca and I occasionally update the file by adding the names of math symbols. If the latest unicode symbol list is available in text format, it should not be too difficult to check if the table in char-def has any missing entries. Unicode data are always available as plain text files: http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/ -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
On 9-1-2011 7:59, Aditya Mahajan wrote: I don't know how it was generated. Mojca and I occasionally update the file by adding the names of math symbols. If the latest unicode symbol list is available in text format, it should not be too difficult to check if the table in char-def has any missing entries. In this case, I just added these four missing characters by hand. The first versions of the table were a combination of data present already in context and some unicode tables from the web (using scripts) but much in the math department was added manually as i found out that tables (like stix) were too flawed and had bugs so were useless for our purpose. We could do some occasional update by checking diffs from older to newer unicodes, not that I expect too many changes. Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
On 9-1-2011 8:58, Mojca Miklavec wrote: It is definitely updatable, but not necessary regularly updated :) :) :) The code that generated the list cannot be used without modifications since there have been many manual changes on the old list, but it is definitely doable. I have a couple of scripts lying around and will have a look one of these days. Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
Hi, are the delimiters \lgroup and \rgroup supported in MkIV? This \starttext $$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$ \stoptext is ok in MkII (ConTeXt ver: 2011.01.06) but when compiled with MkIV (ConTeXt ver: 2010.07.30 11:35 and ver: 2010.07.30 11:35) the delimiters are not shown. (By the way, the same holds true for \rmoustache and \lmoustache.) Am I missing something? Searching the list archive and the contextgarden unfortunately didn't bring up in anything. Thanks in advance, Daniel ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Schopper wrote: Hi, are the delimiters \lgroup and \rgroup supported in MkIV? This \starttext $$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$ \stoptext is ok in MkII (ConTeXt ver: 2011.01.06) but when compiled with MkIV (ConTeXt ver: 2010.07.30 11:35 and ver: 2010.07.30 11:35) the delimiters are not shown. (By the way, the same holds true for \rmoustache and \lmoustache.) Am I missing something? No. The math mappings of virtual fonts are incomplete. The symbols should work correctly with unicode math fonts like cambria, asana, and xits. But, it appears that lgroup and rgroup are missing from xits (Khaled?) and lmoustache and rmoustache are missing from asana! With Cambria there is a bug with scaling: \setupbodyfont[cambria] \enabletrackers[math.analyzing] \usemodule[fnt-25] \starttext \showmathfontcharacters[][0x23B0] \showmathfontcharacters[][0x3014] $$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$ $$\left\lgroup\sum\right\rgroup$$ $$\lgroup\sum\rgroup$$ $$\bigg\lmoustache\dots\bigg\rmoustache$$ $$\left\lmoustache\sum\right\rmoustache$$ $$\lmoustache\sum\rmoustache$$ \stoptext @Hans, Taco, and Mojca: Do you know why the delimiters are not scaling properly? Do you know how to add them to the LM virtual fonts? I tried, but could not get a working solution. I can add the correct mappings to large-to-small table in math-vfu. But adding the mappings for lgroup and rgroup in tex-mr table, and adding lmoustache and rmoustache to tex-ex table does not appear to work. Apply the attached diff file and see what happens with the example above. I don't know how to proceed. BTW, where are the math virtual fonts defined!? I could not find any use of mathematics.makefont. Aditya721,722c721,722 [0x03014] = 0x3A, -- lgroup [0x03015] = 0x3B, -- rgroup --- --~ [0x0] = 0x3A, -- lgroup --~ [0x0] = 0x3B, -- rgroup 726,727c726,727 [0x023B0] = 0x40, -- lmoustache [0x023B1] = 0x41, -- rmoustache --- --~ [0x0] = 0x40, -- lmoustache --~ [0x0] = 0x41, -- rmoustache 749,750d748 [0x023B0] = 0x7A, -- lmoustache [0x023B1] = 0x7B, -- rmoustache 788,789c786,787 [0x00028] = 0x28, -- ( [0x00029] = 0x29, -- ) --- -- [0x00028] = 0x28, -- ( -- [0x00029] = 0x29, -- ) ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 12:52:38PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Schopper wrote:
Hi,
are the delimiters \lgroup and \rgroup supported in MkIV?
This
\starttext
$$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$
\stoptext
is ok in MkII (ConTeXt ver: 2011.01.06) but when compiled with
MkIV (ConTeXt ver: 2010.07.30 11:35 and ver: 2010.07.30 11:35) the
delimiters are not shown. (By the way, the same holds true for
\rmoustache and \lmoustache.)
Am I missing something?
No. The math mappings of virtual fonts are incomplete. The symbols
should work correctly with unicode math fonts like cambria, asana,
and xits. But, it appears that lgroup and rgroup are missing from
xits (Khaled?)
There are, but context is looking for the wring character; it is looking
for U+3014 (which I think is a CJK bracket and does not look like
\lgroup either) while it should be looking for U+27EE (whose Unicode
annotation precisely says lgroup):
\setupbodyfont[xits]
\starttext
$$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$
\def\lgroup{\Udelimiter 4 0 27EE}
\def\rgroup{\Udelimiter 4 0 27EF}
$$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$
\stoptext
It was not extensible though, the version in git now grow, but starts
with a relatively large size, check and tell me if it should be smaller.
Regards,
Khaled
--
Khaled Hosny
Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team
Free font developer
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 09:35:09PM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 12:52:38PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Schopper wrote: Hi, are the delimiters \lgroup and \rgroup supported in MkIV? This \starttext $$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$ \stoptext is ok in MkII (ConTeXt ver: 2011.01.06) but when compiled with MkIV (ConTeXt ver: 2010.07.30 11:35 and ver: 2010.07.30 11:35) the delimiters are not shown. (By the way, the same holds true for \rmoustache and \lmoustache.) Am I missing something? No. The math mappings of virtual fonts are incomplete. The symbols should work correctly with unicode math fonts like cambria, asana, and xits. But, it appears that lgroup and rgroup are missing from xits (Khaled?) There are, but context is looking for the wring character; it is looking for U+3014 (which I think is a CJK bracket and does not look like \lgroup either) BTW, why luatex no longer prints the missing character messages in the log? I was using it to find what characters context is looking for, also now it is near impossible to know if the font is missing some needed character without reviewing every word by eye since luatex (context?) does not show a missing character glyph in such cases, or is there some replacement I've missed? Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Khaled Hosny wrote: On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 12:52:38PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Schopper wrote: Hi, are the delimiters \lgroup and \rgroup supported in MkIV? This \starttext $$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$ \stoptext is ok in MkII (ConTeXt ver: 2011.01.06) but when compiled with MkIV (ConTeXt ver: 2010.07.30 11:35 and ver: 2010.07.30 11:35) the delimiters are not shown. (By the way, the same holds true for \rmoustache and \lmoustache.) Am I missing something? No. The math mappings of virtual fonts are incomplete. The symbols should work correctly with unicode math fonts like cambria, asana, and xits. But, it appears that lgroup and rgroup are missing from xits (Khaled?) There are, but context is looking for the wring character; it is looking for U+3014 (which I think is a CJK bracket and does not look like \lgroup either) while it should be looking for U+27EE (whose Unicode annotation precisely says lgroup): Hmm ... 27EE does not exist: http://unicode.org/charts/PDF/U32-27C0.pdf I believe that I used 3014 based on http://www-sop.inria.fr/apics/tralics/doc-l.html#cmd-lgroup What source do you use for the symbols? Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 02:59:35PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Khaled Hosny wrote: On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 12:52:38PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Schopper wrote: Hi, are the delimiters \lgroup and \rgroup supported in MkIV? This \starttext $$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$ \stoptext is ok in MkII (ConTeXt ver: 2011.01.06) but when compiled with MkIV (ConTeXt ver: 2010.07.30 11:35 and ver: 2010.07.30 11:35) the delimiters are not shown. (By the way, the same holds true for \rmoustache and \lmoustache.) Am I missing something? No. The math mappings of virtual fonts are incomplete. The symbols should work correctly with unicode math fonts like cambria, asana, and xits. But, it appears that lgroup and rgroup are missing from xits (Khaled?) There are, but context is looking for the wring character; it is looking for U+3014 (which I think is a CJK bracket and does not look like \lgroup either) while it should be looking for U+27EE (whose Unicode annotation precisely says lgroup): Hmm ... 27EE does not exist: http://unicode.org/charts/PDF/U32-27C0.pdf I believe that I used 3014 based on http://www-sop.inria.fr/apics/tralics/doc-l.html#cmd-lgroup What source do you use for the symbols? I opened Gnome's Character Map and searched for lgroup :) (but I've seen it before, so I know it exists, I just don't recall the code point). Now that you asked, I checked Unicode website and they have Miscellaneous Mathematical Symbols-A: http://unicode.org/charts/PDF/U27C0.pdf Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
Hmm ... 27EE does not exist: http://unicode.org/charts/PDF/U32-27C0.pdf You're looking at the chart for Unicode 3.2 that is almost 10 years old... The latest version (now 6.0) is always available as http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U27C0.pdf and has the character as Khaled says. Arthur ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
There are, but context is looking for the wring character; it is looking for U+3014 (which I think is a CJK bracket Indeed. It's one of the angle brackets that one finds in many CJK fonts. while it should be looking for U+27EE (whose Unicode annotation precisely says lgroup): Note that those annatations in the code charts are actually the Unicode 1.0 names of the characters, where they differ from the Unicode 1.1 names (when Unicode was unified with ISO 10646 and adopted some of its names). They should not, in general, be understood as the name of this character is some other standard, for example. But they are of course a good hint of what the character represents. Arthur ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: Hmm ... 27EE does not exist: http://unicode.org/charts/PDF/U32-27C0.pdf You're looking at the chart for Unicode 3.2 that is almost 10 years old... I blame everything on google :) The latest version (now 6.0) is always available as http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U27C0.pdf and has the character as Khaled says. Thanks. Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Khaled Hosny wrote: On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 02:59:35PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Khaled Hosny wrote: On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 12:52:38PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Schopper wrote: Hi, are the delimiters \lgroup and \rgroup supported in MkIV? This \starttext $$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$ \stoptext is ok in MkII (ConTeXt ver: 2011.01.06) but when compiled with MkIV (ConTeXt ver: 2010.07.30 11:35 and ver: 2010.07.30 11:35) the delimiters are not shown. (By the way, the same holds true for \rmoustache and \lmoustache.) Am I missing something? No. The math mappings of virtual fonts are incomplete. The symbols should work correctly with unicode math fonts like cambria, asana, and xits. But, it appears that lgroup and rgroup are missing from xits (Khaled?) There are, but context is looking for the wring character; it is looking for U+3014 (which I think is a CJK bracket and does not look like \lgroup either) while it should be looking for U+27EE (whose Unicode annotation precisely says lgroup): Hmm ... 27EE does not exist: http://unicode.org/charts/PDF/U32-27C0.pdf I believe that I used 3014 based on http://www-sop.inria.fr/apics/tralics/doc-l.html#cmd-lgroup What source do you use for the symbols? I opened Gnome's Character Map and searched for lgroup :) (but I've seen it before, so I know it exists, I just don't recall the code point). Now that you asked, I checked Unicode website and they have Miscellaneous Mathematical Symbols-A: http://unicode.org/charts/PDF/U27C0.pdf That was the same range that I had looked at, but somehow that pdf did not have 27EC-27EF. Neither does char-def.lua. So, I guess that these are newer additions. I will add them to char-def.lua and correct the mappings for lgroup and rgroup. Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
That was the same range that I had looked at, but somehow that pdf did not have 27EC-27EF. Neither does char-def.lua. So, I guess that these are newer additions. It's been introduced in Unicode 5.1 in March 2008. Unicode is an evolving standard, you know. Arthur ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \lgroup in mkIV
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 12:52:38PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Daniel Schopper wrote:
Hi,
are the delimiters \lgroup and \rgroup supported in MkIV?
This
\starttext
$$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$
\stoptext
is ok in MkII (ConTeXt ver: 2011.01.06) but when compiled with
MkIV (ConTeXt ver: 2010.07.30 11:35 and ver: 2010.07.30 11:35) the
delimiters are not shown. (By the way, the same holds true for
\rmoustache and \lmoustache.)
Am I missing something?
No. The math mappings of virtual fonts are incomplete. The symbols
should work correctly with unicode math fonts like cambria, asana,
and xits. But, it appears that lgroup and rgroup are missing from
xits (Khaled?)
There are, but context is looking for the wring character; it is looking
for U+3014 (which I think is a CJK bracket and does not look like
\lgroup either) while it should be looking for U+27EE (whose Unicode
annotation precisely says lgroup):
\setupbodyfont[xits]
\starttext
$$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$
\def\lgroup{\Udelimiter 4 0 27EE}
\def\rgroup{\Udelimiter 4 0 27EF}
$$\bigg\lgroup\dots\bigg\rgroup$$
\stoptext
It was not extensible though, the version in git now grow, but starts
with a relatively large size, check and tell me if it should be smaller.
Looks OK to me, but I am not really an expert on the shapes of the
symbols. Can you also make lmoustache and rmoustache extensible?
Hans, I am attaching the patch for char-def.lua that corrects the location
of lgroup and rgroup. I still do not know how to fix this for lm virtual
math font.
Adityadiff --git a/char-def.lua b/char-def.lua
index c496b4a..515f932 100644
--- a/char-def.lua
+++ b/char-def.lua
@@ -63379,6 +63379,46 @@ characters.data={
mirror=0x27EA,
unicodeslot=0x27EB,
},
+ [0x27EC]={
+ category=ps,
+ cjkwd=na,
+ description=MATHEMATICAL LEFT WHITE TORTOISE SHELL BRACKET,
+ direction=on,
+ linebreak=op,
+ mirror=0x27ED,
+ unicodeslot=0x27EC,
+ },
+ [0x27ED]={
+ category=pe,
+ cjkwd=na,
+ description=MATHEMATICAL RIGHT WHITE TORTOISE SHELL BRACKET,
+ direction=on,
+ linebreak=cl,
+ mirror=0x27EC,
+ unicodeslot=0x27ED,
+ },
+ [0x27EE]={
+ category=ps,
+ cjkwd=na,
+ description=MATHEMATICAL LEFT FLATTENED PARENTHESIS,
+ direction=on,
+ linebreak=op,
+ mathclass=open,
+ mathname=lgroup,
+ mirror=0x27EF,
+ unicodeslot=0x27EE,
+ },
+ [0x27EF]={
+ category=pe,
+ cjkwd=na,
+ description=MATHEMATICAL RIGHT FLATTENED PARENTHESIS,
+ direction=on,
+ linebreak=cl,
+ mathclass=close,
+ mathname=rgroup,
+ mirror=0x27EE,
+ unicodeslot=0x27EF,
+ },
[0x27F0]={
category=sm,
description=UPWARDS QUADRUPLE ARROW,
@@ -75694,8 +75734,6 @@ characters.data={
direction=on,
linebreak=op,
mirror=0x3015,
- mathclass=open,
- mathname=lgroup,
unicodeslot=0x3014,
},
[0x3015]={
@@ -75705,8 +75743,6 @@ characters.data={
direction=on,
linebreak=cl,
mirror=0x3014,
- mathclass=close,
- mathname=rgroup,
unicodeslot=0x3015,
},
[0x3016]={
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
