Re: [NTG-context] \overline and \overbar
Dear,
I am sorry to bring up \overline, \overbar, and \bar issue.
Here is a sample file and
I attached two pdf files which were compiled using two different version of
ConTeXt.
Under the LuaTeX v. 1.03, ConTeXt ver: 2017.03.02 22:23 MKIV beta, the output
overlineB.pdf is OK,
but under the LuaTeX v. 1.04, ConTeXt ver: 2017.05.14 19:09 MKIV beta, the
output overlineA.pdf is strange.
Would you please check what is the problem?
Thank you.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
%%
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\item Which is true?
\startitemize[n, packed, columns, two][stopper=,left=(, right=)]
\item $\overline{A} = A \cup A^\circ$
\item $\overline{A\cup B} = \overline{A} \cup \overline{B}$
\item If $A \subset B$ then $\overline{B} \subset \overline{A}$
\item $A\cup A'$ is an open set.
\stopitemize
\item Which is true?
\startitemize[n, packed, columns, two][stopper=,left=(, right=)]
\item $\overbar{A} = A \cup A^\circ$
\item If $A \subset B$ then $\overbar{B} \subset \overbar{A}$
\item $\overbar{A\cup B} = \overbar{A} \cup \overbar{B}$
\item $A\cup A'$ is an open set.
\stopitemize
\item Which is true?
\startitemize[n, packed, columns, two][stopper=,left=(, right=)]
\item $\bar{ACC} = A \cup A^\circ$
\item If $A \subset B$ then $\bar{BCDE} \subset \bar{A}$
\item $\bar{ACC\cup B} = \bar{A} \cup \bar{BCC}$
\item $A\cup A'$ is an open set.
\stopitemize
\stopitemize
\stoptext
log files:
%% -- OverlineA.pdf
mtx-context | run 1: luatex
--fmt="/Users/graph/ConTeXt/tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache/context/5fe67e0bfe781ce0dde776fb1556f32e/formats/luatex/cont-en"
--jobname="0verline"
--lua="/Users/graph/ConTeXt/tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache/context/5fe67e0bfe781ce0dde776fb1556f32e/formats/luatex/cont-en.lui"
--no-parse-first-line --c:currentrun=1 --c:fulljobname="./0verline.tex"
--c:input="./0verline.tex" --c:kindofrun=1 --c:maxnofruns=9 "cont-yes.mkiv"
This is LuaTeX, Version 1.0.4 (TeX Live 2017)
system commands enabled.
open source > level 1, order 1, name
'/Users/graph/ConTeXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/cont-yes.mkiv'
system >
system > ConTeXt ver: 2017.05.14 19:09 MKIV beta fmt: 2017.5.16
int: english/english
system >
%% -- OverlineB.pdf
mtx-context | run 1: luatex
--fmt="/Users/graph/ConTeXt/tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache/context/5fe67e0bfe781ce0dde776fb1556f32e/formats/luatex/cont-en"
--jobname="0verline"
--lua="/Users/graph/ConTeXt/tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache/context/5fe67e0bfe781ce0dde776fb1556f32e/formats/luatex/cont-en.lui"
--no-parse-first-line --c:currentrun=1 --c:fulljobname="./0verline.tex"
--c:input="./0verline.tex" --c:kindofrun=1 --c:maxnofruns=9 --c:purgeall
"cont-yes.mkiv"
This is LuaTeX, Version 1.0.3 (TeX Live 2017/dev)
system commands enabled.
open source > level 1, order 1, name
'/Users/graph/ConTeXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/cont-yes.mkiv'
system >
system > ConTeXt ver: 2017.03.02 22:23 MKIV beta fmt: 2017.3.11
int: english/english
0verline.tex
Description: TeX document
0verlineA.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
0verlineB.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] \overline and \overbar
Dear Henri, Thank you for your reply. I used to use ‘\overline’ in LaTeX as shown in many texts, but it is time to change. Thanks again. Best regards, Dalyoung ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] \overline and \overbar
Neither is correct in a mathematics context. Use \bar.
On 05/10/2017 05:54 PM, Jeong Dal wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> In the following sample, the outputs of \overline and of \overbar are
> slightly different.
> I used \overline in LaTeX.
> But it takes more vertical space that cause the alignment trouble while
> using \overbar has no problem at all.
> Is it normal behavior?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dalyoung
>
>
> \starttext
> \startitemize[n]
> \item Which is true?
>
> \startitemize[n, packed, columns, two][stopper=,left=(, right=)]
> \item $\overline{A} = A \cup A^\circ$
> \item $\overline{A\cup B} = \overline{A} \cup \overline{B}$
> \item If $A \subset B$ then $\overline{B} \subset \overline{A}$
> \item $A\cup A'$ is an open set.
> \stopitemize
>
> \item Which is true?
>
> \startitemize[n, packed, columns, two][stopper=,left=(, right=)]
> \item $\overbar{A} = A \cup A^\circ$
> \item If $A \subset B$ then $\overbar{B} \subset \overbar{A}$
> \item $\overbar{A\cup B} = \overbar{A} \cup \overbar{B}$
> \item $A\cup A'$ is an open set.
> \stopitemize
>
> \stopitemize
>
> \stoptext
>
>
>> 2017. 5. 9. 오후 7:00, ntg-context-requ...@ntg.nl 작성:
>>
>> Send ntg-context mailing list submissions to
>> ntg-context@ntg.nl
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> ntg-context-requ...@ntg.nl
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> ntg-context-ow...@ntg.nl
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of ntg-context digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: BUG: % is comment in btx fields (Henri Menke)
>> 2. Re: BUG: % is comment in btx fields (Rik Kabel)
>> 3. Re: BUG: % is comment in btx fields (Ulrike Fischer)
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 13:40:55 +1200
>> From: Henri Menke
>> To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
>> Subject: Re: [NTG-context] BUG: % is comment in btx fields
>> Message-ID: <1494294055.19890.36.ca...@gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>>
>> On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 20:15 -0400, Rik Kabel wrote:
>>> On 2017-05-08 17:44, Henri Menke wrote:
Dear list,
The percent character in btx field is taken as a comment characters
which leads to the rest of the field being discarded. In the MWE
below, the URL is cut off at the % sign and everything after it is
lost.
Cheers, Henri
---
\startbuffer[references]
@misc{kraft,
author = "Kraft, Nathan",
title = "Mr Kraft's Virtual Filing Cabinet",
year = "2015",
url = "http://mrkraft.wikispaces.com/Mr+Kraft%27s+Virtual+Filing+
Cabi
net"
}
\stopbuffer
\usebtxdataset[references.buffer]
\usebtxdefinitions[apa]
\starttext
\nocite[kraft]
\placelistofpublications
\stoptext
>>> The bibtex entry in this example is provided in a buffer. The buffer
>>> mechanism does not handle characters any differently than other text
>>> in the file, and % in a ConTeXt buffer has to be escaped if it does
>>> not signify a comment.
>>
>> That is simply not true! Content inside ConTeXt buffers is as verbatim
>> as reading an external file. Try \typebuffer instead of \getbuffer
>> your example below and observe that the comment sign is perfectly
>> preserved.
>>
>>> If you specify an external (.bib or .bibtex) file to supply the
>>> data, % does not need to be escaped. So, this part is simple user
>>> error.
>>> (With
>>> \starttext
>>> \startbuffer
>>> abc%def
>>>
>>> ghi\%jkl
>>> \stopbuffer
>>> \getbuffer
>>> \stoptext
>>> you do not get %def in the output. Why do you expect different
>>> behavior if the buffer holds a bibtex entry?)
>>>
>>> The way hyphenatedurl handles things may well be worthy of
>>> improvement.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Rik
>>> _
>>> __
>>> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
>>> entry to the Wiki!
>>>
>>> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/nt
>>> g-context
>>> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
>>> archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
>>> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
>>> _
>>> __
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 21:48:58 -0400
>> From: Rik Kabel
>> To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
>> Subject: Re: [NTG-context] BUG: % is comment in btx fields
>> Message-ID:
[NTG-context] \overline and \overbar
Dear all,
In the following sample, the outputs of \overline and of \overbar are slightly
different.
I used \overline in LaTeX.
But it takes more vertical space that cause the alignment trouble while using
\overbar has no problem at all.
Is it normal behavior?
Thank you.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
\starttext
\startitemize[n]
\item Which is true?
\startitemize[n, packed, columns, two][stopper=,left=(, right=)]
\item $\overline{A} = A \cup A^\circ$
\item $\overline{A\cup B} = \overline{A} \cup \overline{B}$
\item If $A \subset B$ then $\overline{B} \subset \overline{A}$
\item $A\cup A'$ is an open set.
\stopitemize
\item Which is true?
\startitemize[n, packed, columns, two][stopper=,left=(, right=)]
\item $\overbar{A} = A \cup A^\circ$
\item If $A \subset B$ then $\overbar{B} \subset \overbar{A}$
\item $\overbar{A\cup B} = \overbar{A} \cup \overbar{B}$
\item $A\cup A'$ is an open set.
\stopitemize
\stopitemize
\stoptext
> 2017. 5. 9. 오후 7:00, ntg-context-requ...@ntg.nl 작성:
>
> Send ntg-context mailing list submissions to
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ntg-context-requ...@ntg.nl
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ntg-context-ow...@ntg.nl
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of ntg-context digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: BUG: % is comment in btx fields (Henri Menke)
> 2. Re: BUG: % is comment in btx fields (Rik Kabel)
> 3. Re: BUG: % is comment in btx fields (Ulrike Fischer)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 13:40:55 +1200
> From: Henri Menke
> To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
> Subject: Re: [NTG-context] BUG: % is comment in btx fields
> Message-ID: <1494294055.19890.36.ca...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 20:15 -0400, Rik Kabel wrote:
>> On 2017-05-08 17:44, Henri Menke wrote:
>>> Dear list,
>>>
>>> The percent character in btx field is taken as a comment characters
>>> which leads to the rest of the field being discarded. In the MWE
>>> below, the URL is cut off at the % sign and everything after it is
>>> lost.
>>>
>>> Cheers, Henri
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>
>>> \startbuffer[references]
>>> @misc{kraft,
>>> author = "Kraft, Nathan",
>>> title = "Mr Kraft's Virtual Filing Cabinet",
>>> year = "2015",
>>> url = "http://mrkraft.wikispaces.com/Mr+Kraft%27s+Virtual+Filing+
>>> Cabi
>>> net"
>>> }
>>> \stopbuffer
>>>
>>> \usebtxdataset[references.buffer]
>>> \usebtxdefinitions[apa]
>>>
>>> \starttext
>>>
>>> \nocite[kraft]
>>> \placelistofpublications
>>>
>>> \stoptext
>> The bibtex entry in this example is provided in a buffer. The buffer
>> mechanism does not handle characters any differently than other text
>> in the file, and % in a ConTeXt buffer has to be escaped if it does
>> not signify a comment.
>
> That is simply not true! Content inside ConTeXt buffers is as verbatim
> as reading an external file. Try \typebuffer instead of \getbuffer
> your example below and observe that the comment sign is perfectly
> preserved.
>
>> If you specify an external (.bib or .bibtex) file to supply the
>> data, % does not need to be escaped. So, this part is simple user
>> error.
>> (With
>> \starttext
>> \startbuffer
>> abc%def
>>
>> ghi\%jkl
>> \stopbuffer
>> \getbuffer
>> \stoptext
>> you do not get %def in the output. Why do you expect different
>> behavior if the buffer holds a bibtex entry?)
>>
>> The way hyphenatedurl handles things may well be worthy of
>> improvement.
>>
>> --
>> Rik
>> _
>> __
>> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
>> entry to the Wiki!
>>
>> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/nt
>> g-context
>> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
>> archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
>> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
>> _
>> __
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 21:48:58 -0400
> From: Rik Kabel
> To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
> Subject: Re: [NTG-context] BUG: % is comment in btx fields
> Message-ID: <7afe4404-fd96-e7b6-7188-deb8d778e...@rik.users.panix.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> On 2017-05-08 21:40, Henri Menke wrote:
>>
>> That is simply not true! Content inside ConTeXt buffers is as verbatim
>> as reading an external file. Try
