Re: [NTG-context] Custom parameters/options for t-vim

2011-09-06 Thread Andreas Schneider

On 03.09.2011 08:58, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Aditya Mahajan wrote:


On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Andreas Schneider wrote:


However I also like the idea of the optional vimrc via buffer. I
think it might be a nice-to-have feature for the ToDo list :-)


In the end, adding a vimrc feature was not too difficult, so I have
added that. See the dev branch at github. For usage, see the example
at tests/vim/vimrc.tex.


I uploaded a new version of vim module with this feature. See 'Tuning
color schemes' in the user-guide for a terse documentation.

Aditya


Sorry for the late answer, I've been on the road a lot the last few days 
and didn't have the time to test the new changes.


Anyway, I now did test them and it works very well. Thanks for 
implementing this very versatile feature! :-)


--
Best Regards,
Andreas
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Custom parameters/options for t-vim

2011-09-03 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Aditya Mahajan wrote:


On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Andreas Schneider wrote:

However I also like the idea of the optional vimrc via buffer. I think it 
might be a nice-to-have feature for the ToDo list :-)


In the end, adding a vimrc feature was not too difficult, so I have added 
that. See the dev branch at github. For usage, see the example at 
tests/vim/vimrc.tex.


I uploaded a new version of vim module with this feature. See 'Tuning 
color schemes' in the user-guide for a terse documentation.


Aditya

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Custom parameters/options for t-vim

2011-08-31 Thread Andreas Schneider

On 29.08.2011 23:35, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Andreas Schneider wrote:


I worked with t-vim a bit more and encountered a small problem with
the way vim handles syntax definitions. Some of them have several
modes that get activated by setting a variable first. For example the
syntax sh (shell scripts) can be enhanced for bash, ksh, etc.

Example:
let g:is_bash=1
set syntax=sh

Now a line like export foo=bar is highlighted differently than when
I would omit the let g:is_bash=1.

Therefore I would propose another options to \setupvimtyping to
specify custom options to be passed to vim. Preferably they should be
passed at least before the set syntax=... line to make sure that
this particular case -- i.e. switching syntax modes -- works well
(which may be the only necessary case).


That is certainly possible, but the exact solution depends on how robust
you want it to be. I can easily add an option so that

\definevimtyping
[]
[extras={let g:is_bash=1}]

will pass the argument to vim. However, string arguments like

\definevimtyping
[]
[extras={let g:name=Whatever}]

will not work. The reason is that, t-vim first creates a command line
argument that is passed to mtxrun. mtxrun parses the entire expression,
including all the options, When mtxrun figures out that all the
arguments were meant for an external program, it recreates the list of
arguments (to the best of its abilities), and passes the arguments to
the shell. Then the shell tries to interpret the quotes. I haven't been
able to find a solution that will work correctly though these three
transformations.

Another option is to write everything to an external file and source it
as a vimrc file. So, you could do:

\definevimtyping
[...]
[vimrc=shell]

\startvimrc[shell]
let g:is_bash = 1
\stopvimrc

This requires more coding, but is much more flexible than the first option.

Do all syntax highlighting options work with 0/1 parameters? If so, then
the first alternative is easiest.


As far as I can see, most of the relevant options (if not all) are 0/1 
switches, so the first alternative should be enough. Thanks to the pipe 
syntax of vim's command mode, it might be even possible specify more 
parameters that way. [extras={let g:foo=bar | let g:shaz=bot}] -- at 
least vim accepts that usually, I guess it doesn't make a difference if 
specified as commandline parameter.


However I also like the idea of the optional vimrc via buffer. I think 
it might be a nice-to-have feature for the ToDo list :-)


Thank you for the analysis and for coming up with these possible 
implementations!


--
Best Regards,
Andreas
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Custom parameters/options for t-vim

2011-08-31 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Andreas Schneider wrote:

However I also like the idea of the optional vimrc via buffer. I think it 
might be a nice-to-have feature for the ToDo list :-)


In the end, adding a vimrc feature was not too difficult, so I have added 
that. See the dev branch at github. For usage, see the example at 
tests/vim/vimrc.tex.


I have not tested this feature beyond that test file.

Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] Custom parameters/options for t-vim

2011-08-30 Thread Andreas Schneider

Hi,

I worked with t-vim a bit more and encountered a small problem with the 
way vim handles syntax definitions. Some of them have several modes that 
get activated by setting a variable first. For example the syntax sh 
(shell scripts) can be enhanced for bash, ksh, etc.


Example:
let g:is_bash=1
set syntax=sh

Now a line like export foo=bar is highlighted differently than when I 
would omit the let g:is_bash=1.


Therefore I would propose another options to \setupvimtyping to specify 
custom options to be passed to vim. Preferably they should be passed at 
least before the set syntax=... line to make sure that this particular 
case -- i.e. switching syntax modes -- works well (which may be the only 
necessary case).


--
Best Regards,
Andreas
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Custom parameters/options for t-vim

2011-08-30 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Andreas Schneider wrote:

I worked with t-vim a bit more and encountered a small problem with the way 
vim handles syntax definitions. Some of them have several modes that get 
activated by setting a variable first. For example the syntax sh (shell 
scripts) can be enhanced for bash, ksh, etc.


Example:
let g:is_bash=1
set syntax=sh

Now a line like export foo=bar is highlighted differently than when I would 
omit the let g:is_bash=1.


Therefore I would propose another options to \setupvimtyping to specify 
custom options to be passed to vim. Preferably they should be passed at least 
before the set syntax=... line to make sure that this particular case -- 
i.e. switching syntax modes -- works well (which may be the only necessary 
case).


That is certainly possible, but the exact solution depends on how robust 
you want it to be. I can easily add an option so that


\definevimtyping
   []
   [extras={let g:is_bash=1}]

will pass the argument to vim. However, string arguments like

\definevimtyping
   []
   [extras={let g:name=Whatever}]

will not work. The reason is that, t-vim first creates a command line 
argument that is passed to mtxrun. mtxrun parses the entire expression, 
including all the options, When mtxrun figures out that all the arguments 
were meant for an external program, it recreates the list of arguments (to 
the best of its abilities), and passes the arguments to the shell. Then 
the shell tries to interpret the quotes. I haven't been able to find a 
solution that will work correctly though these three transformations.


Another option is to write everything to an external file and source it as 
a vimrc file. So, you could do:


\definevimtyping
  [...]
  [vimrc=shell]

\startvimrc[shell]
  let g:is_bash = 1
\stopvimrc

This requires more coding, but is much more flexible than the first 
option.


Do all syntax highlighting options work with 0/1 parameters? If so, then 
the first alternative is easiest.


Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___